can't sync???
did you update your wallet?
Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards 
now the blocks is ??
Topic: [ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net - page 197. (Read 409641 times)
October 09, 2013, 10:11:58 PM
did you update your wallet?
now the blocks is ??
October 09, 2013, 09:56:26 PM
Difficulty 24008 
October 09, 2013, 09:30:47 PM
can't sync???
did you update your wallet?
Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards
October 09, 2013, 09:27:54 PM
can't sync???
October 09, 2013, 08:58:12 PM
Glad to be of help
The screen bug has never been fixed i think it was related to the HyperThreading pooler had once made the program look for cores but then it only found REAL cores and not fakes like HT
The amd however does have real cores which ofcourse is the blame for the higher power usage, the fact that these slow down is the shared cpu caches for 2 cores. The idea of sharing cache per 2 cores did not have such high impact as amd was hoping for in the real world. Its still a damn fast cpu anyway with good programming at certain programs it beats intel cpu's big time.
The screen bug has never been fixed i think it was related to the HyperThreading pooler had once made the program look for cores but then it only found REAL cores and not fakes like HT
The amd however does have real cores which ofcourse is the blame for the higher power usage, the fact that these slow down is the shared cpu caches for 2 cores. The idea of sharing cache per 2 cores did not have such high impact as amd was hoping for in the real world. Its still a damn fast cpu anyway with good programming at certain programs it beats intel cpu's big time.
October 09, 2013, 08:36:17 PM
If i remember well the last i send you in pm was the one released all the specialized versions
However i am not sure if they also make such a huge difference on blc as they do at quark
But on quark it was impressive
Hope its helpfull
However i am not sure if they also make such a huge difference on blc as they do at quark
But on quark it was impressive
Hope its helpfull
I will take a look now and see what I can do, this is very helpful thank you
October 09, 2013, 08:31:28 PM
If i remember well the last i send you in pm was the one released all the specialized versions
However i am not sure if they also make such a huge difference on blc as they do at quark
But on quark it was impressive
Hope its helpfull
BTW people with the AMD APU cpu's like the A8/A10 your using probably also your internal gpu and i almost 99,9% certain its only using power for do 0,0 blocks finding because blc has not yet an opencl solution.
However i am not sure if they also make such a huge difference on blc as they do at quark
But on quark it was impressive
Hope its helpfull
BTW people with the AMD APU cpu's like the A8/A10 your using probably also your internal gpu and i almost 99,9% certain its only using power for do 0,0 blocks finding because blc has not yet an opencl solution.
October 09, 2013, 08:14:36 PM
LoL its so funny when people are fooling themselfs with a screen bug as being faster mining
On the new model Amd FX processor you get faster speeds with lesser cores enabled, my 8320 is a 8 core but i run it with -t 4 thats giving me the best results
The last minerd made is the one which have for each processor a different miner, they where released for litecoin and quark dated : 16 aug 2013
Versions released where : avx, avx2 barcelona(k10), generic, sse2, sse3, sse4 and one for the last fx versions called BD "for bulldozer".
However these versions do not have the "Blakecoin" option so i do not think they would work well
I agree that the hash rate shown on screen does not = higher block finds or higher network difficulty so its a bug when you set -t to huge number On the new model Amd FX processor you get faster speeds with lesser cores enabled, my 8320 is a 8 core but i run it with -t 4 thats giving me the best results
The last minerd made is the one which have for each processor a different miner, they where released for litecoin and quark dated : 16 aug 2013
Versions released where : avx, avx2 barcelona(k10), generic, sse2, sse3, sse4 and one for the last fx versions called BD "for bulldozer".
However these versions do not have the "Blakecoin" option so i do not think they would work well
I have not tried ig0tik3d x64 build so cannot say if that = higher hash rate
I based the cpu miner on pooler's fork Version 2.3.2 can you point me to the Github of the ones with extra optimizations and I will port in the changes if possible
it does have "The miner can take advantage of AVX, AVX2 and XOP instructions" but you need to build it with mingw-w64
The biggest improvement that I have seen yet is to apply what kramble suggested and do midstate optimization which could result in 50% improvement
I am working on getting p2pool working atm and I do want to move onto GPU with opencl and kramble is currently working on FPGA miner so I don't want to spend too much time on CPU only hope that does not disappoint anyone but I have always made it clear this is a multi platform coin, with open source miners for CPU/GPU/FPGA
October 09, 2013, 07:49:15 PM
LoL its so funny when people are fooling themselfs with a screen bug as being faster mining
On the new model Amd FX processor you get faster speeds with lesser cores enabled, my 8320 is a 8 core but i run it with -t 4 thats giving me the best results
The last minerd made is the one which have for each processor a different miner, they where released for litecoin and quark dated : 16 aug 2013
Versions released where : avx, avx2 barcelona(k10), generic, sse2, sse3, sse4 and one for the last fx versions called BD "for bulldozer".
However these versions do not have the "Blakecoin" option so i do not think they would work well
On the new model Amd FX processor you get faster speeds with lesser cores enabled, my 8320 is a 8 core but i run it with -t 4 thats giving me the best results
The last minerd made is the one which have for each processor a different miner, they where released for litecoin and quark dated : 16 aug 2013
Versions released where : avx, avx2 barcelona(k10), generic, sse2, sse3, sse4 and one for the last fx versions called BD "for bulldozer".
However these versions do not have the "Blakecoin" option so i do not think they would work well
October 09, 2013, 07:44:41 PM
Quote
4000 khash/s on a AMD A10-5800k (thanks to reecelander for testing)
i compiled on my win7 64 and in benchmark mode got about 8000 khash/s
who want can test this version
http://rghost.ru/49274628
Good miner, I want to donate. could you paste your BLC wallet
October 09, 2013, 06:53:59 PM
Selling AMD game codes (Bioshock+Crysis 3 +Farcry:BloodDragon) for 75BlakeCoins 
October 09, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
been solo mining for almost 2 days @ 1.7 mhs no coins any donations to continue my efforts would be appreciated
Bk1SGXCtyrHkVEJ8EDmAzkxtH78m3PuhTp
please share the wealth
Bk1SGXCtyrHkVEJ8EDmAzkxtH78m3PuhTp
please share the wealth
have sent you 10 BLC
ty
October 09, 2013, 04:46:47 PM
Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards
October 09, 2013, 02:02:04 PM
new minerd works great
What new miner? October 09, 2013, 01:54:50 PM
new minerd works great
October 09, 2013, 01:47:26 PM
it`s just numbers i think... Actually you don`t get more blocks....
October 09, 2013, 01:34:44 PM
I 4770k -t 800 powered by igotik3d
October 09, 2013, 12:00:29 PM
October 09, 2013, 11:55:05 AM
1st screen with igotik3d version of miner:
2nd screen with Bluedragon747 version of miner:
So you see the difference
no - your screenshots are so little...
October 09, 2013, 11:54:24 AM
Quote
4000 khash/s on a AMD A10-5800k (thanks to reecelander for testing)
i compiled on my win7 64 and in benchmark mode got about 8000 khash/swho want can test this version
http://rghost.ru/49274628
My antivirus throws a fit with that file win32 crypto Trj !
scanned my minerd and I get no warnings so I think I will stick with compiling my own
Thx for share, your version is faster on my i5 2500k 4GHz Windows 8 64bit
Here are my results:
1st screen with igotik3d version of miner:
2nd screen with Bluedragon747 version of miner:
So you see the difference
Jump to: