[ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net - page 194.

sunsofdust

full member

Activity: 151

Merit: 100

Quote from: spark_li on October 11, 2013, 07:13:43 AM

shit,
BLC has two block chain ?

current can't sync

in debug.log file show

trying connection 23.20.60.243:8773 lastseen=19.6hrs
RandAddSeed() 200700 bytes
received block 00000000007592e2973b7d2f526265c701881fea41b347ccee88930364e28529
nActualTimespan = 2009 before bounds
GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600 nActualTimespan = 3130
Before: 1c0217a6 000000000217a600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After: 1c01d1b7 0000000001d1b7705b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b0
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED

when sync with network,it stop in block of 3559

I am having a similar issue. I have the latest client and deleted the blockchain to re-sync, but the synced blocks stop at 3559. Any suggestions? Or any more nodes that I can add?

bronan

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Lazy Lurker Reads Alot

after 3 days running with 3 cpu's no blocks recevied at all

maxsolnc

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

DTC unofficial team

Quote from: HabbyGab on October 11, 2013, 11:12:02 AM

I don't understand. So is the block reward a solid 25 or what?

25 + small amount (see OP's first post). Now it is really small (near 0.0002 BLC now), so yes, roughly it is 25 BLC.

HabbyGab

member

Activity: 99

Merit: 10

I do not support TIX Tickets.

I don't understand. So is the block reward a solid 25 or what?

meta.p02

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Aalesund on October 11, 2013, 10:29:27 AM

Difficulty: 100869.01430283 Huh

Diff 1 for Blake is diff 1/256 for BTC. So the real difficulty is about 394.

Even that seems a bit high for CPU mining.

Aalesund

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

Difficulty: 100869.01430283 Huh

bronan

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Lazy Lurker Reads Alot

Quote from: BlueDragon747 on October 10, 2013, 08:31:04 PM

Quote from: bronan on October 10, 2013, 08:12:49 PM

Something is wrong the program closed by itself for no reason
I restarted the program and again poof closed
No messages or errors given just instant gone

have you updated?

Quote from: BlueDragon747 on October 09, 2013, 09:40:17 AM

Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards Cool

also you can find the debug.log in same directory as Blakecoin.conf scroll to end and it often gives the errors

edit:
block 3500 and new rule in effect waiting for retargets over next few hours

AddPortMapping(16996, 16996, xxx.notofanyonesbusiness.net) failed with code 403 ((null))
Flushed 1576 addresses to peers.dat 8ms

Looks like the program do want make its own port mapping on my firewall which ofcourse is not allowed

BlueDragon747

legendary

Activity: 1509

Merit: 1030

Solutions Architect

Quote from: spark_li on October 11, 2013, 07:13:43 AM

shit,
BLC has two block chain ?

current can't sync

in debug.log file show

trying connection 23.20.60.243:8773 lastseen=19.6hrs
RandAddSeed() 200700 bytes
received block 00000000007592e2973b7d2f526265c701881fea41b347ccee88930364e28529
nActualTimespan = 2009 before bounds
GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600 nActualTimespan = 3130
Before: 1c0217a6 000000000217a600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After: 1c01d1b7 0000000001d1b7705b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b0
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED

when sync with network,it stop in block of 3559

have you updated your wallet?

new rule took effect block 3500!

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 11, 2013, 06:52:16 AM

Quote from: BlueDragon747 on October 10, 2013, 10:37:26 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 10, 2013, 10:05:54 PM

Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O

How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... Sad

that's just the c code for blake-512 the stuff that runs on the GPU is the .cl files, not had time to work on the GPU miner but I do have blake-256 in opencl soon as I get p2pool working and take a look at the pool code for a few operators I will be working on the GPU miner Cool

Ahh, right, silly me. Can't believe I forgot to look at instructions Tongue

Have you seen https://github.com/wfr/clblake/tree/master/src?

been working all night to get p2pool working for weekend quite tired atm, yes that's the opencl code I have modded but untested atm GPU miner will be worked on soon

Quote from: kramble on October 11, 2013, 04:38:55 AM

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 11, 2013, 02:18:17 AM

Nothing during last 8h. So you understand: 70 MH, no blocks. Either there are huge EC2 instances, or gpu\fpga miner.

Not fpga, unless somebody else is working on it. I've only got a single lancelot at 25MH/s (early days yet, will do better) which has mined 3 blocks so far, and nothing overnight (140 diff=256 hashes in 8 hours, but none accepted). The blake algorithm is not overly complicated though, so its quite possible somebody's got a GPU port up and running by now.

awesome work kramble can't wait to give it a go once i finish this other stuff off Cheesy

spark_li

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

Nothing

shit,
BLC has two block chain ?

current can't sync

in debug.log file show

trying connection 23.20.60.243:8773 lastseen=19.6hrs
RandAddSeed() 200700 bytes
received block 00000000007592e2973b7d2f526265c701881fea41b347ccee88930364e28529
nActualTimespan = 2009 before bounds
GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600 nActualTimespan = 3130
Before: 1c0217a6 000000000217a600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After: 1c01d1b7 0000000001d1b7705b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b0
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED

when sync with network,it stop in block of 3559

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: BlueDragon747 on October 10, 2013, 10:37:26 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 10, 2013, 10:05:54 PM

Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O

How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... Sad

that's just the c code for blake-512 the stuff that runs on the GPU is the .cl files, not had time to work on the GPU miner but I do have blake-256 in opencl soon as I get p2pool working and take a look at the pool code for a few operators I will be working on the GPU miner Cool

Ahh, right, silly me. Can't believe I forgot to look at instructions Tongue

Have you seen https://github.com/wfr/clblake/tree/master/src?

meta.p02

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Tested on i5-3337U: ~5.1 MH/s. with 8 threads.

@kramble: Hm. Gotta buy an FPGA, then. Cheesy

kramble

sr. member

Activity: 384

Merit: 250

Quote from: Carabudala on October 11, 2013, 05:57:44 AM

wich miner you use with FPGA/BE?

Writing my own. Still early days development-wise. It will go up on github as open-source once I get it into a presentable state (its a right dog's breakfast of a hack at the moment). It will just be for lancelot/icarus boards initially as ztex are more difficult to interface to. Won't work on BlockEruptor (it that's what you mean be BE), that's a sha256d asic, completely incapable of blake.

Carabudala

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

wich miner you use with FPGA/BE?

kramble

sr. member

Activity: 384

Merit: 250

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 11, 2013, 02:18:17 AM

Nothing during last 8h. So you understand: 70 MH, no blocks. Either there are huge EC2 instances, or gpu\fpga miner.

Not fpga, unless somebody else is working on it. I've only got a single lancelot at 25MH/s (early days yet, will do better) which has mined 3 blocks so far, and nothing overnight (140 diff=256 hashes in 8 hours, but none accepted). The blake algorithm is not overly complicated though, so its quite possible somebody's got a GPU port up and running by now.

maxsolnc

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

DTC unofficial team

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 10, 2013, 07:41:13 PM

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 10, 2013, 05:34:08 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 10, 2013, 05:19:57 PM

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 10, 2013, 05:12:41 PM

Quote from: 110110101 on October 10, 2013, 05:05:15 PM

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 10, 2013, 01:35:35 PM

......

one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)

That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores?
Impressive setup either way!

5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each)
some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left Grin

Are you renting those, or are they part of some unused infrastructure you have access to?

Unused infrastructure. Sometimes some machines become 'used' and I lose some of hashpower, but it is still rather good for CPU coins.

edited: difficulty 65K Shocked

How many blocks are you getting with the new difficulty?

Oh, and to OP: tried on i5-2500k (no OC) and got around 8300-8700 kH/s

Nothing during last 8h. So you understand: 70 MH, no blocks. Either there are huge EC2 instances, or gpu\fpga miner.

BlueDragon747

legendary

Activity: 1509

Merit: 1030

Solutions Architect

Quote from: Vorksholk on October 10, 2013, 10:05:54 PM

Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O

How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... Sad

that's just the c code for blake-512 the stuff that runs on the GPU is the .cl files, not had time to work on the GPU miner but I do have blake-256 in opencl soon as I get p2pool working and take a look at the pool code for a few operators I will be working on the GPU miner Cool

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O

How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... Sad

BlueDragon747

legendary

Activity: 1509

Merit: 1030

Solutions Architect

Quote from: bronan on October 10, 2013, 08:12:49 PM

Something is wrong the program closed by itself for no reason
I restarted the program and again poof closed
No messages or errors given just instant gone

have you updated?

Quote from: BlueDragon747 on October 09, 2013, 09:40:17 AM

Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards Cool

also you can find the debug.log in same directory as Blakecoin.conf scroll to end and it often gives the errors

edit:
block 3500 and new rule in effect waiting for retargets over next few hours

bronan

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Lazy Lurker Reads Alot

Something is wrong the program closed by itself for no reason
I restarted the program and again poof closed
No messages or errors given just instant gone

BlueDragon747

legendary

Activity: 1509

Merit: 1030

Solutions Architect

Quote from: Aalesund on October 10, 2013, 07:44:53 PM

Quote from: maxsolnc on October 10, 2013, 05:34:08 PM

difficulty 65K Shocked

If difficulty is rising so fast maybe after a year difficulty of BLC will be greater than that difficulty of Bitcoin, hehehehehe.
And maybe 1 BLC = 2 BTC hehehehe
Just a joke, of course Grin

May I ask, when we will have a working BLC p2pool?
I don't mine BLC because now is very hard for solo mining, I'm waiting a pool.

working on p2pool currently and hope to get something ready soon

Topic: [ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net - page 194. (Read 409453 times)