Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][BOUNTY][AIRDROP]⚡️ Electronero ⚡️ ASIC Resistant Electroneum HardFork - page 6. (Read 487062 times)

newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
good evening, I can not validate my email address tells me it can not be validated and then I can not get into the mobile app. who helps me?
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
A new idea is extremely interesting and attractive. Profit from the project will be how much to invest in it.
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Don't understand the definition of this coin, can you introduce it easily and plainly? And, by the way, why did you choose such a name for your coin? Thanks in advance
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
What are the assets & liabilities of your idea? What will be the use of the proceeds raised? What kind of expenses do you expect to incur? What is your cash burn for the year(s) to come?
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 10

 Cheesy np bro

This method is for GUI

Full GUI wallet with local node

1) Download the electronerod
https://github.com/electronero/electronero/releases

2) Download and #import the blockchain.raw or sync from 0
https://release.electronero.org/blockchain/blockchain.raw

3) Start electronerod and Connect to GUI - click remote node, NOT local node when connecting to local node with light wallet.
127.0.0.1 port 12090

Light GUI wallet with remote node

1) Download the electronero GUI
2) Restore from keys or seed
3) Connect to Remote Node
Put port first
20393
nynode.electroneropulse.org or denode.electroneropulse.org  or lanode.electroneropulse.org  or itnode.electroneropulse.org or ronode.electroneropulse.org



1) There is NO Electronero GUI.
2) There is NO blockchain.raw (The requested URL /blockchain/blockchain.raw was not found on this server).
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
I think many people will participate in this idea. New concept with innovative technology and good scalability of the blockchain with the 0 fees transactions.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Will I be ble to participate in your ICO using my MEW?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
What is the bounty of Electronero? Will Electronero's bounty increase in the future?
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 10
Hi..

I cant use sweep_all properly..

no matter what I do, I always receive this message:

"Error: Reason: fee too low"


Code:
sweep_all f4VR74XR616Tw2wAMMfaLV1vmYBSBBbmWXBUtaV8YDb6DHsfKRoYkFaCvhPhsGDDfm1afhzLNuf5XGFmNrvodPoQ6m4qLT2vZ4T8qVuk8dW7Y
Wallet password:

Transaction 1/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 2/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 3/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 4/4:
Spending from address index 0
Sweeping 1818326.00 in 4 transactions for a total fee of 1200.00.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No): Y
Transaction successfully submitted, transaction <8402b911b0ee5615b36f8412b64d2e5470ed398db1d2a3eb72f808e301a45cc0>
You can check its status by using the `show_transfers` command.
Error: transaction <432e2f87c1faadeef2c0b22c72cdb8c18fd652f52221fec10e79d48a31d23846> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed
Error: Reason: fee too low

I have seen it, where the priority adjusted the fee. I will work on perfecting the math on the fee adjustment algo. For now the fast solution is to run sweep_all twice. It just works the second time.. I think due to network traffic..

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Join us in Discord!
https://discord.gg/Msy85Uz
We have a tip bot that rewards you for joining the conversation, and you can !take from the faucet, and also participate in the lottery.

We would be happy to have you join the community.


More you will like:

The mobile app beta for Android is here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.notrait.electronero

The mobile app beta for iOS is here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdiWgtPPS5z_FLunsoI_s8dKsI9MJNLK4z3ypBxI720navvVA/viewform
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
New release: We're implementing new technology in our full stack mobile application, known as zk-PARKS, which will be the technology behind the usages of Electronero parking and Electronero smart contracts. This is the best way I can describe zk-PARKS is in the implementation behind the voting methods employed during the use of electronero smart contracts and parking powered by zero knowledge proofs theory. Through the use of zero-knowledge proofs, a method by which one party (the prover Bob) can prove to another party (the verifier Alice) that she knows a value x, without conveying any information apart from the fact that she knows the value x. Something otherwise concealed through cryptography. Many parties may be involved through participation in public groups. In the example, only Bob and Alice have proof.

In our example, Bob the Founder orders contract, and receives zero knowledge proof. Receives a contract profile with a link to invite participants. Many users join and have the opportunity to interact with the Contract. Knowing that it's an environment built around zero-knowledge proofs only Bob and Alice would know if Bob or Alice participated in the contract through verifiable blockchain proof.

We're making use of a new protocol! zk-PARKS, which will be the technology behind the usages of Electronero parking and Electronero smart contracts. This is the best way I can describe zk-PARKS is in the implementation behind the voting methods employed during the use of electronero smart contracts and parking powered by zero knowledge proofs theory. Through the use of zero-knowledge proofs, a method by which one party (the prover Bob) can prove to another party (the verifier Alice) that she knows a value x, without conveying any information apart from the fact that she knows the value x. Something otherwise concealed through cryptography. Many parties may be involved through participation in public groups. In the example, only Bob and Alice have proof.

In our example, Bob the Founder orders contract, and receives zero knowledge proof. Receives a contract profile with a link to invite participants. Many users join and have the opportunity to interact with the Contract. Knowing that it's an environment built around zero-knowledge proofs only Bob and Alice would know if Bob or Alice participated in the contract through verifiable blockchain proof

The acronym zk-PARKS stands for “Zero-Knowledge Private Interactive Argument of Knowledge,” and refers to a proof construction where one can prove possession of certain information, e.g. a secret key, without revealing that information, and without any interaction between the prover and verifier.

With this update comes:
-Double Spending outs upstream patch
-Hard Fork Announcment

https://github.com/electronero/electronero/releases/tag/12.3.3
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
When reading about the project, I've seen you spend quite a good development strategy: 3% on mobile apps. 7% for developers. Does the project provide specific guidance on how to use this funding?

We're invested in to the mobile app now heavily. I am CTO and I work for the community along with some other developers. We're always welcoming new members to the Electronero Core (currently 6 on the team) and the Electronero Global Consensus (currently 29 on consensus) after volunteering to the community and a simple vetting process. Etc.. Thanks for your time. God bless.
copper member
Activity: 183
Merit: 0
Hi..

I cant use sweep_all properly..

no matter what I do, I always receive this message:

"Error: Reason: fee too low"


Code:
sweep_all f4VR74XR616Tw2wAMMfaLV1vmYBSBBbmWXBUtaV8YDb6DHsfKRoYkFaCvhPhsGDDfm1afhzLNuf5XGFmNrvodPoQ6m4qLT2vZ4T8qVuk8dW7Y
Wallet password:

Transaction 1/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 2/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 3/4:
Spending from address index 0

Transaction 4/4:
Spending from address index 0
Sweeping 1818326.00 in 4 transactions for a total fee of 1200.00.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No): Y
Transaction successfully submitted, transaction <8402b911b0ee5615b36f8412b64d2e5470ed398db1d2a3eb72f808e301a45cc0>
You can check its status by using the `show_transfers` command.
Error: transaction <432e2f87c1faadeef2c0b22c72cdb8c18fd652f52221fec10e79d48a31d23846> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed
Error: Reason: fee too low

I have seen it, where the priority adjusted the fee. I will work on perfecting the math on the fee adjustment algo. For now the fast solution is to run sweep_all twice. It just works the second time.. I think due to network traffic..
Pages:
Jump to: