Topic: [ANN][BRK] Breakout Coin | Sale June 13 2016 | Multicurrencies | Smart Contracts - page 12. (Read 243356 times)

I hope no one took you up on your offer because it is seriously flawed for the buyer. I'd buy them from you at that price without hesitation, but the Bergstake isn't transferable. That means I'd have to trust you to never use the Bergstake, and I don't rely on trust. I'd buy all 13k for 1 BTC, with an agreement that you would never use Bergstake, and my hoping but not betting that you would honor the agreement.

PM me if you are interested in that deal.

[edit]

Actually, nevermind. You'd still have the private key to the wallet. If you could get the BRO team to somehow transfer ownership to my private key, I'll buy them from you at 6500 BRO/BTC.

Keep on posting questions please.  Also, we will try to post screenshots and live video of the demos, so everyone can at least see visible progress.  Thanks everyone!

why do u think so?
i am waiting from november
i don't believe in success

Unless you really need it, I wouldn't do that...seriously.

who want to buy json files @ price (6500bro - 1btc)- first birds invstors
pls pm me
i am ready to sell 13k bro

Wow.  That's a good question.  Hard to believe a "Core Developer" would split time between multiple projects when one raised over $1m in 24 hours.

It's great to be skeptical, but you are trolling here.

Jay Berg is contracted for BRO coin, not a core developer. He said this several weeks ago.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9894488

Let's stick to legitimate concerns here, we'll make more progress. Don't try to "clean up" crypto by spreading unnecessary FUD. If you stick with the real issues you'll make more progress towards legitimacy than you will by just being a low grade troll.

[edit]

But this page is a bit misleading, so qawsx get's a 1/2 FUD rating.

http://fundraiser.breakoutgaming.com/the-team/

Still, we accept that David Hanlon (for example) has other employment outside of Breakout, so we should expect the programmers to also have outside employment.

Yeah, it's "something". You said "nothing to show". You do know the difference between "something" and "nothing", right?

Don't try to bend reality to fit your agenda.

Are you for real? A beta poker platform in 5 months? You call that something?

"Nothing to show"? Quit being a stupid troll. Plenty of people have tested their gaming platform. Stick to reality. You want us to think you are helping to "clean up crypto" but your noise just enables the scammers by distracting from the real issues. You must be one of the scammers. That's my only conclusion.

I still want a refund, I had enough of this BRO thing, almost half an year and they show nothing?
This is way over fudding or trolling or everything, this is absurd already, nothing to show in this much time?

It's great to be skeptical, but you are trolling here.

Jay Berg is contracted for BRO coin, not a core developer. He said this several weeks ago.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9894488

Let's stick to legitimate concerns here, we'll make more progress. Don't try to "clean up" crypto by spreading unnecessary FUD. If you stick with the real issues you'll make more progress towards legitimacy than you will by just being a low grade troll.

[edit]

But this page is a bit misleading, so qawsx get's a 1/2 FUD rating.

http://fundraiser.breakoutgaming.com/the-team/

Still, we accept that David Hanlon (for example) has other employment outside of Breakout, so we should expect the programmers to also have outside employment.

Based on this I want a refund ASAP!

Wait a minute... what's Jay Berg doing at Factom
http://factom.org/team

Can BreakoutGaming still count on him for Bergstake ?

Wow.  That's a good question.  Hard to believe a "Core Developer" would split time between multiple projects when one raised over $1m in 24 hours.

Wait a minute... what's Jay Berg doing at Factom
http://factom.org/team

Can BreakoutGaming still count on him for Bergstake ?

This is quite an outburst. It's obvious that a lot of ICO buyers are starting to lose confidence.

I don't necessarily share their opinions, but these concerns need to be addressed.

If Breakout is indeed looking for funding outside of the crypto-sphere, it will be a good idea to fix the easy things that would undoubtedly help with other avenues of fundraising:

1. Provide a timeline of development or release. Be inclusive and let it come from the OP. Give date ranges and explain contingencies.
2. Fix (up) the web site. Put the preview images in. Make updates. Get it current.
3. Start using the twitter account to show evidence of a pulse to the greater population.
4. Get the press releases flowing again.
5. Move to phase 2 of the ICO without further delay. The benefit of waiting for a more complete product is going to be increasingly undercut by a lack of confidence from the crypto-community. If you look at factom, there are still plenty of individuals who want to get in on the ground floor of a promising crypto project. But if you have several dozen accounts on this thread accusing Breakout of being a scam, you are going to see significantly less money from the ICO. You already need non-ICO funding, so you might as well get ICO funds while you can use them.

I know that your first round ICO represents only a small fraction of your total needed funds. But the crypto-community is an important bellwether for any crypto-currency project such as Breakout gaming. Don't ignore this community because it seems like an insignificant source of funds. Rather, it can be a significant source of visibility and help with your larger fundraising efforts through positive exposure.