I will keep mining on Suprnova. When the donation website is online I will think of my contribution.
Here is the pool with the supporting project https://pool.miningspeed.com, it works well, an honest pool, more profitable than suprnova.cc by 7-15%, crediting to the wallet after 100 confirmations - about 4.5 hourshi, how do you calculated that you earn 7-15% more? this is just assuption or did you test it? becouse as i understand, it shoud all pool give you the same ammount of coin, different is only a % of fee they have (that is in theory on long run), ofcoure if pool do not steal in the behind. differend is laso paying mathod and bigger pool,less share, more time payments and smaller pools, less payments , but bigger one. and in the and it should be equal right?
i was happy with suprnova, mostly i get more or it looks more. I moved only becouse of community donation. if suprnova had that, i would never leave. most people like to have trusted pool and new pool has to gain trust and it takes time, that miner moved.
i will really like, that you explain your better % gain in that pool vs. suprnova pool. thx
10/29/2017 tested Suprnova 1 * gtx1060 - 320sol / s, 19 hours 30 minutes of operation 131 BTCZ = 6.71 BTCZ per hour.
At the same time, 1 * 1070 - 460sol / s on the miningspeed pool 208 BTCZ = 10.66 BTCZ per hour, which is approximately 10.66 * (320/460) = 7.41 BTCZ per hour 320sol / s.
7.41 / (6.71 / 100) = 110.43%
This is of course a very rough test and counting. In September, I noticed the same thing with ZEN, compared with flypool. Of course, all this depends on the specific situation on the network, but two such tests forced to draw such a conclusion.
In addition, I do not like that Suprnova does not either fight with the possibility of 51% precedent ..., for many new coins they have more than 51% capacity. I think that people working with a blockchain should take care of the network with which they work.
Sorry for my english (translate.google.com)
