Author

Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 1254. (Read 2170889 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
so;
- after your plots are done being created, the 'run_generate.bat' will close on its own, and you will have only the wallet and 'run_mine.bat' running?

- the burst wallet screen site idle for the most part?
My last activity in the 'wallet' window was 2 days ago.


I have 3 pc's running, nothing found yet....

did you sync your system time before mining? dev said it's very important
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
so;
- after your plots are done being created, the 'run_generate.bat' will close on its own, and you will have only the wallet and 'run_mine.bat' running?

- the burst wallet screen site idle for the most part?
My last activity in the 'wallet' window was 2 days ago.


I have 3 pc's running, nothing found yet....

- also maybe a bug in the wallet webpage
does anyone notice on the Blocks menu - 'All Blocks' and 'Mined By You' does not change\refresh when either buttons are clicked?
(or is my wallet stuck)

?

thx
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
I want to buy some BURST,
where ?

50k for 0.4 BTC!
Sy
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective

...

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Code:
/burst?requestType=getBlockchainStatus (GET) Thu Aug 14 2014 13:35:28 GMT+0200

{
"lastBlock": "1014125104951407132",
"lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1201,
"time": 293728,
"lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62",
"numberOfBlocks": 1201,
"isScanning": false,
"cumulativeDifficulty": "67567251495709",
"version": "1.0.0"
}


What about this 'cumulativeDifficulty' ... thought this is the diff?!


Increased by 5% within 21 blocks...

{
    "lastBlock": "16322078320396019945",
    "lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1222,
    "time": 299736,
    "lastBlockchainFeeder": "54.167.111.103:8123",
    "numberOfBlocks": 1223,
    "isScanning": false,
    "cumulativeDifficulty": "70385126787201",
    "version": "1.0.0"
}
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.

JBOD and RAID0 have no form of parity. JBOD can be recovered compared to RAID0, but RAID5 has parity and more performance than JBOD. One disk sacrifice is better than losing all the data possible, especially on RAID0. Originally I was going to do a RAID0/JBOD, but after thinking about it, I didn't want the chance of failure. Good thing about JBOD, you can mix and match hdd's, and use their full capacity. As with RAID, you ideally want to match identical hdd's.

Your point?

I wouldn't post that if i didnt know what i am talking about but thanks for the lesson...

Why should i care about parity for some mining plots i can even recreat exact copies of IF a drive fails...one more drive is imho worth more than the slight chance that ONE drive will fail within the next days / weeks.

You have your opinion and I have mine, I respect yours...

I guess I'll just wait and see how it goes with this small 500GB hdd before investing into a few 4TB drives.

For normal world use i would always go raid5 / raidZ but not for plot generation, no offense Smiley

I am using FreeNAS ZFS in my home server.

No offense taken, your free to speak and think. It's not like your trying to kill my family, insult my religion and/or anything major like that...lol

Just annoying to recreate plots, if that needs to be done.
Sy
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
JFYI i am currently generating plots, one i5-4460 with 2048 staggermant creates around 0.5 gb/min with 4 threads (measured over 30 minutes) since we are trying to put things into numbers Smiley
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
why create a raid anyway ... e.g. for windows you can simply hardlink plot-files from different drives to your mining 'plots' folder ...
Code:
mklink /h c:\pocminer\plots\your_plot_file x:\your_plot_file

Just simplicity. Guess you can do that too.
Sy
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.

JBOD and RAID0 have no form of parity. JBOD can be recovered compared to RAID0, but RAID5 has parity and more performance than JBOD. One disk sacrifice is better than losing all the data possible, especially on RAID0. Originally I was going to do a RAID0/JBOD, but after thinking about it, I didn't want the chance of failure. Good thing about JBOD, you can mix and match hdd's, and use their full capacity. As with RAID, you ideally want to match identical hdd's.

Your point?

I wouldn't post that if i didnt know what i am talking about but thanks for the lesson...

Why should i care about parity for some mining plots i can even recreat exact copies of IF a drive fails...one more drive is imho worth more than the slight chance that ONE drive will fail within the next days / weeks.

You have your opinion and I have mine, I respect yours...

I guess I'll just wait and see how it goes with this small 500GB hdd before investing into a few 4TB drives.

For normal world use i would always go raid5 / raidZ but not for plot generation, no offense Smiley
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.

JBOD and RAID0 have no form of parity. JBOD can be recovered compared to RAID0, but RAID5 has parity and more performance than JBOD. One disk sacrifice is better than losing all the data possible, especially on RAID0. Originally I was going to do a RAID0/JBOD, but after thinking about it, I didn't want the chance of failure. Good thing about JBOD, you can mix and match hdd's, and use their full capacity. As with RAID, you ideally want to match identical hdd's.

Your point?

I wouldn't post that if i didnt know what i am talking about but thanks for the lesson...

Why should i care about parity for some mining plots i can even recreat exact copies of IF a drive fails...one more drive is imho worth more than the slight chance that ONE drive will fail within the next days / weeks.

You have your opinion and I have mine, I respect yours...

I guess I'll just wait and see how it goes with this small 500GB hdd before investing into a few 4TB drives.
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 255
why create a raid anyway ... e.g. for windows you can simply hardlink plot-files from different drives to your mining 'plots' folder ...
Code:
mklink /h c:\pocminer\plots\your_plot_file x:\your_plot_file
Sy
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.

JBOD and RAID0 have no form of parity. JBOD can be recovered compared to RAID0, but RAID5 has parity and more performance than JBOD. One disk sacrifice is better than losing all the data possible, especially on RAID0. Originally I was going to do a RAID0/JBOD, but after thinking about it, I didn't want the chance of failure. Good thing about JBOD, you can mix and match hdd's, and use their full capacity. As with RAID, you ideally want to match identical hdd's.

Your point?

I wouldn't post that if i didnt know what i am talking about but thanks for the lesson...

Why should i care about parity for some mining plots i can even recreat exact copies of IF a drive fails...one more drive is imho worth more than the slight chance that ONE drive will fail within the next days / weeks.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1010
ITSMYNE 🚀 Talk NFTs, Trade NFTs 🚀
Posting here for future reference, looks promising.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.

JBOD and RAID0 have no form of parity. JBOD can be recovered compared to RAID0, but RAID5 has parity and more performance than JBOD. One disk sacrifice is better than losing all the data possible, especially on RAID0. Originally I was going to do a RAID0/JBOD, but after thinking about it, I didn't want the chance of failure. Good thing about JBOD, you can mix and match hdd's, and use their full capacity. As with RAID, you ideally want to match identical hdd's.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 565
Getting a pool together would be great

Its been 48 hours and still no block.
Im waiting to see if this actually works before getting ahold of several harddrives.

Same here. It is cheaper to buy a bunch of hdd's compared to gpu cards, but results have to be worth it first. I haven't found a block since I started 60 hours ago on a 500gb drive. But I keep seeing people with smaller drives find blocks and/or find block within 6 hours of starting mining on a hdd. Luck or have people found the optimal setting to mine with?

You did start the wallet and the miner - right?

Got all 3 bats working(run,generate and wallet), I am technically inclined and Cisco CCNA certified. I just barely got the plot to finish a couple minutes ago. I did a 400GB plot on the 500gb drive.

My guess is that you should avg at least one block per day, no sure way to tell without knowing the diff though -.-

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Sure, you take your own hashrate (plotsize)  and avg the blocks per day, break it down -> avg blocks per day.

Doesn't really work though because the net is in its main growing stage and my hashrate is expending too, i can post some numbers after the weekend though, i'll be done with plot generation tomorrow, running 4700GB

i've made excel worksheet to estimate avg blocks per day for 1 TB, which is based on my blocks and this guy with 16 TB plot, i watch my blocks, his and number of last block, if more people get their data it could be more accurate (size of plot and ID), now it gives me 1,44block/TB/day

ahhh, that's the info i needed!!
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
Getting a pool together would be great

Its been 48 hours and still no block.
Im waiting to see if this actually works before getting ahold of several harddrives.

Same here. It is cheaper to buy a bunch of hdd's compared to gpu cards, but results have to be worth it first. I haven't found a block since I started 60 hours ago on a 500gb drive. But I keep seeing people with smaller drives find blocks and/or find block within 6 hours of starting mining on a hdd. Luck or have people found the optimal setting to mine with?

You did start the wallet and the miner - right?

Got all 3 bats working(run,generate and wallet), I am technically inclined and Cisco CCNA certified. I just barely got the plot to finish a couple minutes ago. I did a 400GB plot on the 500gb drive.

My guess is that you should avg at least one block per day, no sure way to tell without knowing the diff though -.-

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Sure, you take your own hashrate (plotsize)  and avg the blocks per day, break it down -> avg blocks per day.

Doesn't really work though because the net is in its main growing stage and my hashrate is expending too, i can post some numbers after the weekend though, i'll be done with plot generation tomorrow, running 4700GB

i've made excel worksheet to estimate avg blocks per day for 1 TB, which is based on my blocks and this guy with 16 TB plot, i watch my blocks, his and number of last block, if more people get their data it could be more accurate (size of plot and ID), now it gives me 1,44block/TB/day
Sy
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
Raid5 won't help much since you even sacrifice one disk, if you set it up just for mining go jbod or raid0...

And yes, people are expanding and still building their systems, plot generation is awfully slow.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Getting a pool together would be great

Its been 48 hours and still no block.
Im waiting to see if this actually works before getting ahold of several harddrives.

Same here. It is cheaper to buy a bunch of hdd's compared to gpu cards, but results have to be worth it first. I haven't found a block since I started 60 hours ago on a 500gb drive. But I keep seeing people with smaller drives find blocks and/or find block within 6 hours of starting mining on a hdd. Luck or have people found the optimal setting to mine with?

You did start the wallet and the miner - right?

Got all 3 bats working(run,generate and wallet), I am technically inclined and Cisco CCNA certified. I just barely got the plot to finish a couple minutes ago. I did a 400GB plot on the 500gb drive.

My guess is that you should avg at least one block per day, no sure way to tell without knowing the diff though -.-

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Sure, you take your own hashrate (plotsize)  and avg the blocks per day, break it down -> avg blocks per day.

Doesn't really work though because the net is in its main growing stage and my hashrate is expending too, i can post some numbers after the weekend though, i'll be done with plot generation tomorrow, running 4700GB
Getting a pool together would be great

Its been 48 hours and still no block.
Im waiting to see if this actually works before getting ahold of several harddrives.

Same here. It is cheaper to buy a bunch of hdd's compared to gpu cards, but results have to be worth it first. I haven't found a block since I started 60 hours ago on a 500gb drive. But I keep seeing people with smaller drives find blocks and/or find block within 6 hours of starting mining on a hdd. Luck or have people found the optimal setting to mine with?

You did start the wallet and the miner - right?

Got all 3 bats working(run,generate and wallet), I am technically inclined and Cisco CCNA certified. I just barely got the plot to finish a couple minutes ago. I did a 400GB plot on the 500gb drive.

My guess is that you should avg at least one block per day, no sure way to tell without knowing the diff though -.-

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Sure, you take your own hashrate (plotsize)  and avg the blocks per day, break it down -> avg blocks per day.

Doesn't really work though because the net is in its main growing stage and my hashrate is expending too, i can post some numbers after the weekend though, i'll be done with plot generation tomorrow, running 4700GB

That average will work for a week, then it will change next week because all the big miners will have there storage servers mining. That will surely make mining difficulty for the smaller miner. Gpu mining all over again...LOL

I do plan to do a RAID 5 with 4 drives, once I see I can get a couple of blocks with my current setup.

We need to get together one big chart of settings so we can optimize our setup for the most efficient performance according to how big and many harddrive(s) we have.



That is a very good idea, maybe put up a Google docs spreadsheet that can be linked to the OP.


...

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Code:
/burst?requestType=getBlockchainStatus (GET) Thu Aug 14 2014 13:35:28 GMT+0200

{
"lastBlock": "1014125104951407132",
"lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1201,
"time": 293728,
"lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62",
"numberOfBlocks": 1201,
"isScanning": false,
"cumulativeDifficulty": "67567251495709",
"version": "1.0.0"
}


What about this 'cumulativeDifficulty' ... thought this is the diff?!


No sure if it definitive like gpu/cpu mining. It might be, but it hasn't been exactly elaborated on.
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 255

...

Solo mining is highly luck base compare to pool mining. Plus, there is no way to know the diff or whatever is like a diff for this coin. So, there is no way to calculate block per day.

Code:
/burst?requestType=getBlockchainStatus (GET) Thu Aug 14 2014 13:35:28 GMT+0200

{
"lastBlock": "1014125104951407132",
"lastBlockchainFeederHeight": 1201,
"time": 293728,
"lastBlockchainFeeder": "109.195.211.62",
"numberOfBlocks": 1201,
"isScanning": false,
"cumulativeDifficulty": "67567251495709",
"version": "1.0.0"
}


What about this 'cumulativeDifficulty' ... thought this is the diff?!
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
when the generation plot Mining as effective?
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
We need to get together one big chart of settings so we can optimize our setup for the most efficient performance according to how big and many harddrive(s) we have.

Jump to: