Topic: [ANN][BWK] BULWARK | NO ICO | Masternodes | Accelerated PoW | Seesaw PoS/MN - page 105. (Read 125737 times)
January 11, 2018, 07:00:00 PM
Whats with the umine, stopped finding blocks?
January 11, 2018, 05:32:16 PM
Here's a BingBang 0.4% fee for you
http://35.205.229.103
I just made this for fun, if lot of people come i will lower pool fee
http://35.205.229.103
I just made this for fun, if lot of people come i will lower pool fee
January 11, 2018, 10:59:15 AM
Where did 8 blocks gone?
From 37112 to 37119
http://i68.tinypic.com/14nz7sk.png
Update: They just appeared 4 hours later.
From 37112 to 37119
http://i68.tinypic.com/14nz7sk.png
Update: They just appeared 4 hours later.
January 11, 2018, 06:13:42 AM
What other coins do people mine with nist5 today? I see sometimes nicehash power is used somewhere else, but can't find any alive nist5 coins as TAC and UPM looks like both dead now?
There is ECTAM but it's not a popular one. It will only have mining for a few more days anyway as it ends at block 15000 and we are near 13000
No, something else. Ectam has tiny net hashrate 0.004TH, while nicehash hashes 2.3TH now, while BWK difficulty stays intact at 60k.
January 11, 2018, 05:59:42 AM
What other coins do people mine with nist5 today? I see sometimes nicehash power is used somewhere else, but can't find any alive nist5 coins as TAC and UPM looks like both dead now?
There is ECTAM but it's not a popular one. It will only have mining for a few more days anyway as it ends at block 15000 and we are near 13000
January 11, 2018, 03:19:06 AM
What other coins do people mine with nist5 today? I see sometimes nicehash power is used somewhere else, but can't find any alive nist5 coins as TAC and UPM looks like both dead now?
January 11, 2018, 01:21:30 AM
Debating between the ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 and the suggested nvida miner ccminer-alexis78-ms2013-cuda7.5
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
The Alexis version has been shown to be faster. It's better optimized for the NIST5 algorithm and, therefore, higher hash rates with the same hardware when compared to ccminer 2.2
Thanks.
Yeah I feel like there is a huge blind spot for many GPU miners (not that I'm necessarily complaining!) in mining with the Nist5 algo and what miners to use, and bulwark in particular I think is a good case study of this where it has steadily risen in value, has a good path ahead, focus on masternodes etc, but is still not getting quite the number of miners to match its price.
Part of this is because it is missing on the front page of whattomine in my opinion. Recently I wrote a short blog post pointing this out if you're interested:
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@hassy/whattomine-is-missing-algorithms-and-is-losing-you-money
January 11, 2018, 12:36:48 AM
Debating between the ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 and the suggested nvida miner ccminer-alexis78-ms2013-cuda7.5
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
The Alexis version has been shown to be faster. It's better optimized for the NIST5 algorithm and, therefore, higher hash rates with the same hardware when compared to ccminer 2.2
Thanks.
January 10, 2018, 11:33:37 PM
Debating between the ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 and the suggested nvida miner ccminer-alexis78-ms2013-cuda7.5
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
The Alexis version has been shown to be faster. It's better optimized for the NIST5 algorithm and, therefore, higher hash rates with the same hardware when compared to ccminer 2.2
January 10, 2018, 10:37:15 PM
Debating between the ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 and the suggested nvida miner ccminer-alexis78-ms2013-cuda7.5
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
I get this with the alexis one. Why is it reporting two different hash rates? What are you guys using?
GPU#0:ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 78.90MH/s
[2018-01-10 21:35:54] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 1.387, 68.79MH/s yes!
Thanks,
January 10, 2018, 05:06:35 PM
what are the chances of finding a block of bwk on your own? I am currently mining in tiny.pool and I am the only two miners.
There is currently 2.6Th/s nethash so you'd have to have quite the mining operation to be able to effectively solo mine it on your own pool.
January 10, 2018, 04:15:48 PM
what are the chances of finding a block of bwk on your own? I am currently mining in tiny.pool and I am the only two miners.
January 10, 2018, 01:11:20 AM
^ Correct. Coinmarketcap doesn't allow "Technically Infinite" for a Max Supply so we decided to just give them the count for end of year 5 for the time being and will update later on when it becomes relevant.
January 09, 2018, 06:44:33 PM
I just wanted to clarify something here. We've been getting a few people concerned in regards to a 27 million coin maximum supply with 14 million being generated in year one.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
I think I'm not getting this. Is the max coin supply 27 millions or infinite?
27M plus 561k in perpetuity
January 09, 2018, 06:32:30 PM
I just wanted to clarify something here. We've been getting a few people concerned in regards to a 27 million coin maximum supply with 14 million being generated in year one.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
I think I'm not getting this. Is the max coin supply 27 millions or infinite?
January 09, 2018, 04:38:31 PM
Bulwark (BWK) is available at tiny-pool.com
tiny-pool.com
can be tested at:
Lowest fees : 0.5%
Low latency
Multi core, multi threads for higher performance
No Registration required.
Block Explorer: https://tiny-pool.com/explorer/BWK
Bounty to: bUaZ7v1vgUWrsn647xCkhXMJp5gbEGdZqV
tiny-pool.com
Code:
-a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://tiny-pool.com:3833 -u-p c=BOXY
can be tested at:
Code:
-a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://tiny-pool.com:3833 -u bUaZ7v1vgUWrsn647xCkhXMJp5gbEGdZqV -p c=BWK
Low latency
Multi core, multi threads for higher performance
No Registration required.
Block Explorer: https://tiny-pool.com/explorer/BWK
Bounty to: bUaZ7v1vgUWrsn647xCkhXMJp5gbEGdZqV
January 09, 2018, 03:43:26 PM
I just wanted to clarify something here. We've been getting a few people concerned in regards to a 27 million coin maximum supply with 14 million being generated in year one.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
The only reason it's displayed this way on Coinmarketcap is because they don't allow for us to add a footnote that dictates supply is technically infinite.
Total coin supply at the end of year five will be approximately 27 million. Maximum supply is infinite with 561,000BWK being added annually year six and beyond.
January 09, 2018, 03:11:14 PM
I can't believe the returns of masternodes on this coin.
I almost get the impression the whole system here works for the masternode owners.
Not that I'm complaining
I almost get the impression the whole system here works for the masternode owners.
Not that I'm complaining
January 08, 2018, 04:14:19 PM
So how does the staking work? Is it already implemented?
Not implemented yet, it wont be for a while.
Eventually it will go half POS half masternode
January 08, 2018, 03:25:00 PM
I think there is the best time to get listed at binance or kucoin (for example). that will be pretty hard fly to the moon, isn't it?
Jump to: