>We not associated with signatum
>Still talks with and does business deals with crowetic
https://imgur.com/a/yb2ZJ
Topic: [ANN][BWK] BULWARK | NO ICO | Masternodes | Accelerated PoW | Seesaw PoS/MN - page 153. (Read 125735 times)
December 02, 2017, 12:24:37 AM
December 02, 2017, 12:19:33 AM
Ok. I just have some hash like that:
RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
I'm getting a lot lower mhs with gtx 1070. What are your settings for this?RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
Try using Alexis miner. That seems to be pushing out the best hash rate for nvidias
Try to set intensity.
-i 20
or -i 21
no luck with Alexis. Tried -i21 on Tsurv version and i'm getting +/- 35 Mh/s up from 28-30 so i guess that's an improvement :p
December 02, 2017, 12:09:49 AM
https://imgur.com/a/Euocd
eatbattery the best dev in the world.
https://imgur.com/a/0L1aq
pic of eatbattery telling his e-friends he dumped but telling the public to hodl.
eatbattery the best dev in the world.
https://imgur.com/a/0L1aq
pic of eatbattery telling his e-friends he dumped but telling the public to hodl.
Were trying to keep this on topic. Both of your claims have been refuted. Stop spamming your nonsense please.
December 02, 2017, 12:03:04 AM
im ready to mine this XD
December 02, 2017, 12:02:25 AM
https://imgur.com/a/Euocd
eatbattery the best dev in the world.
https://imgur.com/a/0L1aq
pic of eatbattery telling his e-friends he dumped but telling the public to hodl.
Notice how at first he denied being associated with Signatum until couple hours later he got exposed and now all his buddies are coming in telling everyone he was one of the good guys and he was doing it for the "community". Oh wow golly!
He was a nobody who got paid $5,000+ to shill Signatum by crowetic. He has no previous background in crypto.
After Signatum's utter failure they try to overtake Signatum, but they had no access too the original Signatum facebook+twitter and gave up.
I know all this because i knew Eatbattery way before Signatum even came to light. Im one of the first person to recommend Signatum too him.
Then somehow he became a Developer for this shit-coin.
He decided to take a cool-down period where he disappeared off #spacestation for near a month and once confronted he had an epic rant talking about it wasn't his fault/etc. Causing everyone to turn there backs on him. He got roasted hard i still have screencaps of these as well.
eatbattery the best dev in the world.
https://imgur.com/a/0L1aq
pic of eatbattery telling his e-friends he dumped but telling the public to hodl.
Notice how at first he denied being associated with Signatum until couple hours later he got exposed and now all his buddies are coming in telling everyone he was one of the good guys and he was doing it for the "community". Oh wow golly!
He was a nobody who got paid $5,000+ to shill Signatum by crowetic. He has no previous background in crypto.
After Signatum's utter failure they try to overtake Signatum, but they had no access too the original Signatum facebook+twitter and gave up.
I know all this because i knew Eatbattery way before Signatum even came to light. Im one of the first person to recommend Signatum too him.
Then somehow he became a Developer for this shit-coin.
He decided to take a cool-down period where he disappeared off #spacestation for near a month and once confronted he had an epic rant talking about it wasn't his fault/etc. Causing everyone to turn there backs on him. He got roasted hard i still have screencaps of these as well.
December 01, 2017, 11:48:39 PM
I like the masternode requirement. How difficult is to mine right now? Did a lot of people jump in right away or are the rewards still juicy? I like to rate a pow project by how strong the network starts and holds. A pretty good project to be keeping an eye on but what about the team being the same as signatum....that kinda sucks considering that would make this coin susceptible to be a scam.
Rewards are scaling up to the full 50/block at 960, started at .1 at block 2. Didn't need/want any of the pools to get ddos'ed. Nethash is currently at ~25gh/s and climbing.
And see above for the statement on SIGT, it's not the "same team" as you put it.
December 01, 2017, 11:48:12 PM
I like the masternode requirement. How difficult is to mine right now? Did a lot of people jump in right away or are the rewards still juicy? I like to rate a pow project by how strong the network starts and holds. A pretty good project to be keeping an eye on but what about the team being the same as signatum....that kinda sucks considering that would make this coin susceptible to be a scam.
I'd prefer to keep this thread solely about this project. However I will say that those who performed the actual scamming on that project are not associated with this project in any way, shape, or form.
As for the mining difficulty, we employed a linear block reward for the first 960 blocks. It starts at .01BWK/block and will slowly increase to the full 50BWK/block starting reward over the first (approximately) day of mining. It is still more than early enough to get in and strike while the iron is hot.
December 01, 2017, 11:41:30 PM
What is up with the blocktime? 6 blocks in last hour? http://yiimp.poolofd32th.club/site/mining
We got hit with a lot more hash power than we expected. We're pushing a block update through at block 250 that should help remedy that and get things going as desired.
December 01, 2017, 11:38:16 PM
What is up with the blocktime? 6 blocks in last hour? http://yiimp.poolofd32th.club/site/mining
December 01, 2017, 11:36:33 PM
I like the masternode requirement. How difficult is to mine right now? Did a lot of people jump in right away or are the rewards still juicy? I like to rate a pow project by how strong the network starts and holds. A pretty good project to be keeping an eye on but what about the team being the same as signatum....that kinda sucks considering that would make this coin susceptible to be a scam.
December 01, 2017, 11:33:09 PM
I might mine this. It seems very similar to Solaris which has been rising. I notice at least one team member was on the Signatum team though.
entire team is from signatumwho? cro, skank and doc?
None of those people are associated with the Bulwark project in any way, shape, or form.
https://imgur.com/a/qPhCL
eatbattery is a scammer
told some people in pm's he dumped and recommended others to do so, but too the public he told everyone to hodl... that everything is fine.
SkankHunt42, and TheDoctor brought a lot of good people into their project and misled them. Eatsbatterys was one of those people (so was I, for that matter). By the time the level of deception within the SIGT core team was apparent most of the community volunteers A) called it for what it was around mid-August and B) disassociated with the project. Not sure what more you would want somebody to do.
December 01, 2017, 11:30:49 PM
I might mine this. It seems very similar to Solaris which has been rising. I notice at least one team member was on the Signatum team though.
entire team is from signatumwho? cro, skank and doc?
None of those people are associated with the Bulwark project in any way, shape, or form.
https://imgur.com/a/qPhCL
eatbattery is a scammer
told some people in pm's he dumped and recommended others to do so, but too the public he told everyone to hodl... that everything is fine.
All I'll say on that is that a couple of us were suckered into helping promote a coin with lazy developers. We left the project and were labeled "scammers" by people such as yourself. The new team that took over after that point then left the project again for the exact same reason to start their own coin.
If you don't want to participate in Bulwark nobody is forcing you to. But please do not post incorrect information on our project's thread because you feel like you were scammed by somebody that has nothing to do with this project.
December 01, 2017, 11:30:06 PM
Ok. I just have some hash like that:
RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
I'm getting a lot lower mhs with gtx 1070. What are your settings for this?RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
Try using Alexis miner. That seems to be pushing out the best hash rate for nvidias
Try to set intensity.
-i 20
or -i 21
December 01, 2017, 11:28:43 PM
I might mine this. It seems very similar to Solaris which has been rising. I notice at least one team member was on the Signatum team though.
entire team is from signatumwho? cro, skank and doc?
None of those people are associated with the Bulwark project in any way, shape, or form.
https://imgur.com/a/qPhCL
eatbattery is a scammer
told some people in pm's he dumped and recommended others to do so, but too the public he told everyone to hodl... that everything is fine.
you know that screenshot was from SIGT right, and has nothing to do with Bulwark right?
December 01, 2017, 11:24:03 PM
I might mine this. It seems very similar to Solaris which has been rising. I notice at least one team member was on the Signatum team though.
entire team is from signatumwho? cro, skank and doc?
None of those people are associated with the Bulwark project in any way, shape, or form.
We knew this egotistical pleb before signatum also.
https://imgur.com/a/Euocd
pic of friend telling me eatbattery told him to sell
https://imgur.com/a/Uakst
eatbattery telling everyong it was premined in a private chat
https://imgur.com/a/qPhCL
looking for the actual screenshot... these convos are so old im having a hard ttime locating them.
will edit once i find.
https://imgur.com/a/0L1aq
Telling his e-friend he dumped ^^
told some people in pm's he dumped and recommended others to do so, but too the public he told everyone to hodl... that everything is fine.
December 01, 2017, 11:16:11 PM
Ok. I just have some hash like that:
RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
I'm getting a lot lower mhs with gtx 1070. What are your settings for this?RX 470 = 19-20 mh
1070 = 51-54 mh
1080 = 69 mh
Try using Alexis miner. That seems to be pushing out the best hash rate for nvidias
December 01, 2017, 10:45:29 PM
sync failed 
Me too. However, my blocks seem up to date. I wonder if the error we are getting is because there are no masternodes running, yet.
You are correct, sir. It'll all work itself out organically as we get further along. Everything in the wallet works 100% as intended even if it's displaying the 50% sync status.
Thanks for letting me know so I don't rack my brain trying to "fix." I'll just ignore the message for now.
December 01, 2017, 10:42:07 PM
Using ccminer 2.2 with GTX 1070 .BAT; ccminer-x64-75.exe -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.poolofd32th.club:3833 -u cryptopunkwalletaddress -p c=BWK
Afterburner settings; CC:0 to +135 MC:600 to 700
getting around 30 MH/s
Afterburner settings; CC:0 to +135 MC:600 to 700
getting around 30 MH/s
December 01, 2017, 10:40:27 PM
sync failed
Me too. However, my blocks seem up to date. I wonder if the error we are getting is because there are no masternodes running, yet.
You are correct, sir. It'll all work itself out organically as we get further along. Everything in the wallet works 100% as intended even if it's displaying the 50% sync status.
December 01, 2017, 10:38:18 PM
sync failed
Me too. However, my blocks seem up to date. I wonder if the error we are getting is because there are no masternodes running, yet.
Jump to: