Jackpot added to the MiningCentral!
Now you can grab preconfigured mining bundle and just mine JPC.
No more fighting with miner settings.
Discussion thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736034.new#new
Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 32. (Read 224423 times)
Just compiled the new wallet, looking nice - the block explorer is more a crawler, you can't look into addresses like explorers do, still a nice thing to have.
how did you want to look? i have a feeling mrpj has left us :p
No i bet he's hanging out with the chicks at the beach. He comes into irc every 4 weeks and asks "any news" and never has time to read the detailed replies
Just compiled the new wallet, looking nice - the block explorer is more a crawler, you can't look into addresses like explorers do, still a nice thing to have.
how did you want to look? i have a feeling mrpj has left us :p
Just compiled the new wallet, looking nice - the block explorer is more a crawler, you can't look into addresses like explorers do, still a nice thing to have.
I pushed to github the latest cpp code. and a proposed reduction in retarget time reference from one week to eight hours. That should be better for the hashrate spikes. The date is not fixed yet, will most likely change it. Also, we're talking about adaptive interest rate. But that might have to wait until java version is complete. Unless there's much demand for it 
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
What do you mean by adaptive interest rate?
meaning that the interest rate be dependent on network activity or something. It's just something that came up in one of our discussions on new features to introduce later on. It's just an idea, not saying that it'll happen, but i like the idea
I pushed to github the latest cpp code. and a proposed reduction in retarget time reference from one week to eight hours. That should be better for the hashrate spikes. The date is not fixed yet, will most likely change it. Also, we're talking about adaptive interest rate. But that might have to wait until java version is complete. Unless there's much demand for it
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
What do you mean by adaptive interest rate?
I pushed to github the latest cpp code. and a proposed reduction in retarget time reference from one week to eight hours. That should be better for the hashrate spikes. The date is not fixed yet, will most likely change it. Also, we're talking about adaptive interest rate. But that might have to wait until java version is complete. Unless there's much demand for it
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Thanks kalgecin for working so hard for this coin. You are the main reason I keep holding CACH, maybe forever
I pushed to github the latest cpp code. and a proposed reduction in retarget time reference from one week to eight hours. That should be better for the hashrate spikes. The date is not fixed yet, will most likely change it. Also, we're talking about adaptive interest rate. But that might have to wait until java version is complete. Unless there's much demand for it
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Discussion most welcome here
And our dedicated forum http://forum.cachecoin.org/
Right now we're almost finished porting the cach protocol starting to fuse it with the GUI while fixing smaller hickups in parallel. All in all it looks better and better :-)
starting to fuse it with the GUI while fixing smaller hickups in parallel. All in all it looks better and better :-) any information about the FROZEN Status on polo? 
no idea. they seem to freeze coins for no reason sometimes. never announcing it or anything. Then they re-enable it... last time i asked, they said they're moving servers :p
any information about the FROZEN Status on polo?
One more simple question. Kal, were you aware that JR BUDDY was jasinlee wife's account?
I knew that she did help put a good word on my coinsflip site, but never bothered to get her account name or follow her around. Please, for more questions or whatever you want to call them, create a new thread or something. Stop spamming this one!
Cache never has been pumped and dumped, ever...
I wish it had been pumped like xc or darkcoin, I would be a rich man now...
I wish it had been pumped like xc or darkcoin, I would be a rich man now...
We expect it to be self pumping once the rewriting is complete and new features and improvements start rolling out. The development hasn't seaced on cach, it's just that the rewrite is taking longer than I expected :-(
Cache never has been pumped and dumped, ever...
I wish it had been pumped like xc or darkcoin, I would be a rich man now...
I wish it had been pumped like xc or darkcoin, I would be a rich man now...
One more simple question. Kal, were you aware that JR BUDDY was jasinlee wife's account?
Time will tell, my friend.
yeah time will tell and we will know when it comes.
Time will tell, my friend.
That all depends.. If it is uncovered, as things seem to point to, that people were being misled about the information provided on the ASICs, and the work being done on them, I will be seeking full purchase value as of 3/17/14. If Jasinlee can prove that ASICS were being actively developed and confirm the information that he provided to the public, then I would gladly eat the loss in value of the purchase.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
I don't get your point. You're saying that we used fibonacci to pump the coin value and dump, thus, stealing and lying to people. And yet, we haven't dumped a single cach...... Dunno what you're getting at. And regarding the old coinsflip.com, I don't see harm in people trying to advertise a site.....
If you made the assumption that there were no ASICs and it was just a huge ploy. You *could* have mined / purchased the coin for .01 - .05. Made the announcement - brought it up to $1.50. Sold to customers who wanted the discount (making 30X profit). Refund the bitcoin, litecoin & cache to everyone.
Basically since you sold the cache on the exchange for bitcoin, pulled the cache in offering a discount, now you can refund the cache. It would be a huge (and actually impressive) pump & dump.
I have followed your changes on github. And actually am impressed with the UI. So if it doesn't add up to be a complete scheme (massive amount of work has been done on cache). But it doesn't add up to be legit either.
Yes I agree, if it was a scam scheme, then that would be a big profit. But.... It wasn't and we didn't.
Now people, please, back to cach only stuff on this thread. I'll report spam any more jasin/fibonacci flaming here.
That all depends.. If it is uncovered, as things seem to point to, that people were being misled about the information provided on the ASICs, and the work being done on them, I will be seeking full purchase value as of 3/17/14. If Jasinlee can prove that ASICS were being actively developed and confirm the information that he provided to the public, then I would gladly eat the loss in value of the purchase.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
I don't get your point. You're saying that we used fibonacci to pump the coin value and dump, thus, stealing and lying to people. And yet, we haven't dumped a single cach...... Dunno what you're getting at. And regarding the old coinsflip.com, I don't see harm in people trying to advertise a site.....
If you made the assumption that there were no ASICs and it was just a huge ploy. You *could* have mined / purchased the coin for .01 - .05. Made the announcement - brought it up to $1.50. Sold to customers who wanted the discount (making 30X profit). Refund the bitcoin, litecoin & cache to everyone.
Basically since you sold the cache on the exchange for bitcoin, pulled the cache in offering a discount, now you can refund the cache. It would be a huge (and actually impressive) pump & dump.
I have followed your changes on github. And actually am impressed with the UI. So if it doesn't add up to be a complete scheme (massive amount of work has been done on cache). But it doesn't add up to be legit either.
At the time, I'm not clear if most knew that Jasin
was involved with the development of Cachecoin with Kalgecin. It had an odd flavor to it, and most should have realized
that there really was no logical explanation of Jasin accepting Cachecoin at a discount, unless he and others
were dumping it to those that began buying it because of the large discount.
My theory is that Jasin accepted Cachecoin as part of a scheme with Kalgecin to sell an otherwise worthless coin and
generate a false marketplace and temporary demand for the coin to allow them to sell their holdings at a significant premium.
Then, when ASIC's are "delayed", offer of Cachecoin refunds (at 1/50th of value) are allowed and they keep the profits from
selling at the premium price when they never intended to deliver a working product.
was involved with the development of Cachecoin with Kalgecin. It had an odd flavor to it, and most should have realized
that there really was no logical explanation of Jasin accepting Cachecoin at a discount, unless he and others
were dumping it to those that began buying it because of the large discount.
My theory is that Jasin accepted Cachecoin as part of a scheme with Kalgecin to sell an otherwise worthless coin and
generate a false marketplace and temporary demand for the coin to allow them to sell their holdings at a significant premium.
Then, when ASIC's are "delayed", offer of Cachecoin refunds (at 1/50th of value) are allowed and they keep the profits from
selling at the premium price when they never intended to deliver a working product.
When i made cach initially, Jasin wasn't involved at all. It's a bit after that we agreed to involve cach. We had no "scheme", yes, we did want to raise the coin value, who doesn't? But there's no scheme to it. And we haven't dumped any coins. And people who have paid with cach will receive their product as promised.
Quote
Fast-forward to August, with countless promises by Jasinlee to have an Exchange setup, ASIC delivered, and countless other
things, and there is no proof that has been provided that any work has even been done by Fibonacci towards a working ASIC. Questions are met with NDA statements, mysterious partners that stole coins, but then were recovered, and many other excuses
with no promises being kept.
things, and there is no proof that has been provided that any work has even been done by Fibonacci towards a working ASIC. Questions are met with NDA statements, mysterious partners that stole coins, but then were recovered, and many other excuses
with no promises being kept.
We did have a partner, thibaud. who worked on the exchange and had the site running for the preorders. All was well and on track, until he started trying to make the asic deals behind our back and keeping quite for days. Scaring off our partners. Thus the delay in production. And then he went quite for a few weeks. with most of the coins he refused to send over.
Quote
So, allow me some conjecture that Jasinlee, the owner of Fibonacci, developer of Cachecoin who was conspiring with his
wife's account, his own account and Kalgecin's account with coinsflip.com are the same exact players (with others)
involved in the SCRYPT ASIC debacle.
wife's account, his own account and Kalgecin's account with coinsflip.com are the same exact players (with others)
involved in the SCRYPT ASIC debacle.
Jasin is not the developer of cach, and wasn't involved in creating it with me. I created and developed it.
As for telling people to take legal action against him, the way you put it, it sounds personal. I'm pretty sure that these ASICs aren't the first to be delayed. These things are hard to predict. I wouldn't rush into screaming scam just yet.
kalgecin - here is what makes NO SENSE. You just explained more (Asic deals behind our back, scared off partners, etc) than Jasin will in the Fib thread. In fact - he was explaining in the XC thread that his developer had stolen coins BEFORE telling anyone in the litecoin thread.
It's so weird to me that continued layers of this onion are always peeled off in places OUTSIDE of the original thread where Jasin sold the shares. He is being beyond elusive. It comes across more of "How do I contain this so it doesn't bleed into my other projects" which make the answers ... unbelievable. And make people continue to seek answers with Jasin's partners. (He's stated Cache & XC are part of Fibonacci . . . )
That all depends.. If it is uncovered, as things seem to point to, that people were being misled about the information provided on the ASICs, and the work being done on them, I will be seeking full purchase value as of 3/17/14. If Jasinlee can prove that ASICS were being actively developed and confirm the information that he provided to the public, then I would gladly eat the loss in value of the purchase.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
The point here is that the whole deal appears to have been a unique ploy to pump and dump the coin using an artificial demand for the coin. If that is proven in court, both civil and criminal action will be taken.
I believe that is quite fair, as all he needs to do is show his work matches with what he was telling everyone. Delays don't bug me, lies and deceit do.
I don't get your point. You're saying that we used fibonacci to pump the coin value and dump, thus, stealing and lying to people. And yet, we haven't dumped a single cach...... Dunno what you're getting at. And regarding the old coinsflip.com, I don't see harm in people trying to advertise a site.....
Jump to: