[ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 69.

Glandoux

full member

Activity: 133

Merit: 100

Quote from: kilbus on March 13, 2014, 01:08:47 PM

Im getting about 96 khash/s out of my Gigabyte R9 270, looks pretty good if you ask me. ;P

Code:

cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o http://cache.cryptoprojects.eu:8336/ -u Cachecoin address -p 1 -w 256 -I 19 -g 1 --thread-concurrency 21568 --gpu-fan 100 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500 --lookup-gap 2

Very nice, too bad there's nothing out there for other cards =\.

singula

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 251

Quote from: CrunchHarder on March 13, 2014, 02:35:13 PM

...
Peace of mind CACHeCoin mining with Crunch Harder:
...

I'll repeat my tip - if you have any mining hardware available, throw at least some of it at your pool. People are much more likely to join a pool with at least 1 or 2 workers in it than a pool that is completely empty.

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

Quote from: singula on March 13, 2014, 02:41:06 PM

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 09:51:39 AM

Noone started working on libzerocoin integration? I'm about to start

I'm pretty busy around the pools, the situation is a bit better now, but dedicatedpool still has hashrate around about 70-75% of network hashrate. I have some ideas how to attract more people to other pools and I hope that dedicatedpool will end up having less than 50% in the long run ...

Quote from: Snard on March 13, 2014, 01:06:56 PM

Is libzerocoin even ready for public use yet?

Could be good enough for testnet usage, but I'd hesitate to add it to main coin in current state. If some serious flaw would be found, this can ruin the blockchain and trust in the coin. I think extensive testing needs to be done first ...

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 01:13:26 PM

not yet. I've put libzerocoin on hold for now. It's something else i've been working on Wink

coin control? That one is mature enough for public use

Let me see, git pull .... and there are only compile instructions for ubuntu (btw you should add to the readme that these instructions will compile the daemon, not the GUI wallet)
So I guess I'll have to wait to see what it will be ....

Not coin control yet Wink

that's next

singula

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 251

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 09:51:39 AM

Noone started working on libzerocoin integration? I'm about to start

I'm pretty busy around the pools, the situation is a bit better now, but dedicatedpool still has hashrate around about 70-75% of network hashrate. I have some ideas how to attract more people to other pools and I hope that dedicatedpool will end up having less than 50% in the long run ...

Quote from: Snard on March 13, 2014, 01:06:56 PM

Is libzerocoin even ready for public use yet?

Could be good enough for testnet usage, but I'd hesitate to add it to main coin in current state. If some serious flaw would be found, this can ruin the blockchain and trust in the coin. I think extensive testing needs to be done first ...

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 01:13:26 PM

not yet. I've put libzerocoin on hold for now. It's something else i've been working on ;)

coin control? That one is mature enough for public use :)
Let me see, git pull .... and there are only compile instructions for ubuntu (btw you should add to the readme that these instructions will compile the daemon, not the GUI wallet)
So I guess I'll have to wait to see what it will be ....

CrunchHarder

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: singula on March 12, 2014, 02:53:42 PM

Quote from: Don007 on March 12, 2014, 02:06:09 PM

I took a look at all the other pools, but they only got a few miners and aren't really attractive. I don't got an account at Dedicatedpool (and I think you aren't able to register a new one though), so some of the existing miners at Dedicatedpool should hop into another pool. IF we want to spread the total hashrate ofcourse.

The registrations seems to be open on dedicatedpool. Other pools are small, but at least two of them (cach.catcoin.cz and p2pools) have still reasonable local block time (around 7-15% of dedicatedpool hashrate and block time between 2 and 4 hours), the other three are a bit small to be really attractive though (one of them is even empty with "We are investingating issues in the backend" message) ...

I think it was the CrunchHarder pool at https://cache.crunchharder.net that had the "We are investigating issues in the backend" message up. Sorry for any delay/inconvenience - we had a small issue (no coins lost) yesterday which stalled the cronjobs which run the block updates and payouts etc. It's now been fixed so everything is running as usual now and no coins were lost.

https://cache.crunchharder.net

https://crunchharder.net/images/logo-sm.jpg

Peace of mind CACHeCoin mining with Crunch Harder:

*UK-Based Pool
*High End Dedicated Servers
*Fully Redundant, Fault-Tolerant Architecture
*Automatic Backup of Wallets and Databases
*Technical Support from Experienced Coin Devs and Pool Owners
*Dedicated Support Ticketing System
*4096 Bit SSL Security with SHA256

https://cache.crunchharder.net

CrunchHarder

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: singula on March 11, 2014, 08:30:27 PM

Quote from: CrunchHarder on March 11, 2014, 06:43:46 PM

Would be great if you could add the CrunchHarder CACHeCoin pool as well https://cache.crunchharder.net and help spread the hash around!

Your pool already is (and was) there, except it has a typo in its name, it is labeled as "Crush Harder pool".

Kalgecin, can you fix the typo?

Thanks for that!

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Snard on March 13, 2014, 01:06:56 PM

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 09:51:39 AM

Noone started working on libzerocoin integration? I'm about to start

Is libzerocoin even ready for public use yet?

not yet. I've put libzerocoin on hold for now. It's something else i've been working on Wink

kilbus

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Im getting about 96 khash/s out of my Gigabyte R9 270, looks pretty good if you ask me. ;P

Code:

cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o http://cache.cryptoprojects.eu:8336/ -u Cachecoin address -p 1 -w 256 -I 19 -g 1 --thread-concurrency 21568 --gpu-fan 100 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500 --lookup-gap 2

Snard

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: kalgecin on March 13, 2014, 09:51:39 AM

Noone started working on libzerocoin integration? I'm about to start

Is libzerocoin even ready for public use yet?

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

Something new is coming to CACHeCoin quite soon ;-) something many will like Tongue

bumaga

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

HD7970/280x (1044/1500), expected hashrate about 135kh/s for 280x

Code:

setx GPUMAXALLOCPERCENT 100
setx GPUUSESYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer --scrypt-jane --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u worker_user -p worker_password -w 256 -g 2 -I 12 --thread-concurrency 16384 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 2 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0

Have you tried this one out?

What parameters are you using now?
[/quote]

I have Gigabyte 280x windforce and conf is

cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum -u 1-p 1 -I 12 --thread-concurrency 16384 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 2 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0

if I use -w 256 -g 2
PC show me blue screen..

I try change Engine clock from 1000-1100 and maximum speed was 75KH

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

Noone started working on libzerocoin integration? I'm about to start

bit_coin_genuis

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Are you not getting massive amount of HW errors with that config ?

BernoulliS

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: bit_coin_genuis on March 13, 2014, 12:36:34 AM

Quote from: Glandoux on March 12, 2014, 08:03:52 AM

SHould I only be getting 160k on 290s?

180Kh/s seems to be concensus MAX on R9 290 ... I am currently getting only 72kh/s and have tried over and over I don't know what I am missing !!!

I would kill to get 160kh/s..

Can you please post all of your configurations .. ( your config file and line arguments at launch if you have any)

Hoe many cards you have in your rig and what brand ?

Thanks

I'm getting about 140kH/s per card, config is 2 x MSI R9 290, 4Gb RAM, on the following settings:

-w 64 -g 1 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 42000 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 3 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

gpu engine 1000, mem clock 1500, powertune 20, set in afterburner

bit_coin_genuis

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Quote from: Glandoux on March 12, 2014, 08:03:52 AM

SHould I only be getting 160k on 290s?

180Kh/s seems to be concensus MAX on R9 290 ... I am currently getting only 72kh/s and have tried over and over I don't know what I am missing !!!

I would kill to get 160kh/s..

Can you please post all of your configurations .. ( your config file and line arguments at launch if you have any)

Hoe many cards you have in your rig and what brand ?

Thanks

luiggybit

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: singula on March 12, 2014, 05:22:05 PM

Quote from: luiggybit on March 12, 2014, 04:47:14 PM

It seems that difficulty its not adjusting???, all the time the pool (dedicated) says current diff 28, est next 20 (or even lower) but on the next block, diff still 28...

Anyone noticed that?

All the pools have the difficulty calculation wrong - the pool software uses only a simple approximation, while the coin uses actually more complex algorithm, looking back to several blocks in the past in the calculation. But reimplementing the full algorithm would be complex and would yield only a small benefit (slightly better next block diff prediction), so all the pools use a crude estimation - which can be quite wrong

The real diff stays near 28 - as the hashrate is stable, I'd predict the diff stays at 28 for a while unless more miners will either come mining cachecoin, or stop mining cachecoin.

ty to clarify

singula

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 251

Quote from: bumaga on March 12, 2014, 05:09:33 PM

now Nfactor: 11
I have with my 280x only - 70kh
write plz best config for 280x

I have some config posted on my pool's news page:

HD7970/280x (1044/1500), expected hashrate about 135kh/s for 280x

Code:

setx GPUMAXALLOCPERCENT 100
setx GPUUSESYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer --scrypt-jane --Nfmin 4 --Nfmax 30 --StartT 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u worker_user -p worker_password -w 256 -g 2 -I 12 --thread-concurrency 16384 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 2 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0

Have you tried this one out?

What parameters are you using now?

singula

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 251

Quote from: luiggybit on March 12, 2014, 04:47:14 PM

It seems that difficulty its not adjusting???, all the time the pool (dedicated) says current diff 28, est next 20 (or even lower) but on the next block, diff still 28...

Anyone noticed that?

All the pools have the difficulty calculation wrong - the pool software uses only a simple approximation, while the coin uses actually more complex algorithm, looking back to several blocks in the past in the calculation. But reimplementing the full algorithm would be complex and would yield only a small benefit (slightly better next block diff prediction), so all the pools use a crude estimation - which can be quite wrong

The real diff stays near 28 - as the hashrate is stable, I'd predict the diff stays at 28 for a while unless more miners will either come mining cachecoin, or stop mining cachecoin.

bumaga

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

now Nfactor: 11
I have with my 280x only - 70kh
write plz best config for 280x

luiggybit

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

It seems that difficulty its not adjusting???, all the time the pool (dedicated) says current diff 28, est next 20 (or even lower) but on the next block, diff still 28...

Anyone noticed that?

Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 69. (Read 224425 times)