I was going to use these cachecoins to buy a device too, but now, at This price, it is going to be too expensive for me
. I think the value of Cache will decrease after monday. 
Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 70. (Read 224425 times)
Well, its the Fibonacci vendor, with their Scrypt Asic devices.
I was going to use these cachecoins to buy a device too, but now, at This price, it is going to be too expensive for me. I think the value of Cache will decrease after monday.
I was going to use these cachecoins to buy a device too, but now, at This price, it is going to be too expensive for me
. I think the value of Cache will decrease after monday. 
Seems cach starting to take off on cryptsy, volume doubled in less than 12 hours!
That's because an equipment vendor is accepting CACH as payment at the value of 0.01 BTC for 24 hours beginning on Monday. This is causing people to buy it up at a discounted rate to get a discount on the equipment.
Do you have a link to the vender accepting Cache?
I took a look at all the other pools, but they only got a few miners and aren't really attractive. I don't got an account at Dedicatedpool (and I think you aren't able to register a new one though), so some of the existing miners at Dedicatedpool should hop into another pool. IF we want to spread the total hashrate ofcourse.
The registrations seems to be open on dedicatedpool. Other pools are small, but at least two of them (cach.catcoin.cz and p2pools) have still reasonable local block time (around 7-15% of dedicatedpool hashrate and block time between 2 and 4 hours), the other three are a bit small to be really attractive though (one of them is even empty with "We are investingating issues in the backend" message) ...
Also, I am mining on dedicatedpool.com and it says my workers have a lot less kh than they really do and the difficulty there doesn't match the 28 that appear when I'm mining or that's written in their blocks, anyone know for this? Appreciate the help!
Try another pool? As I see it now, dedicatedpool.com has about 80% - 90% of network hashrate, so while there are no indication they'll do something evil (like some sort 51% attack) with that it would be better to spread the hashrate more evenly. There are 4 other pools and many p2pool nodes.
The diff reported by the pool often fluctuates between about half and double of the real value, but if it stays significantly below the real value, then something is wrong with either the miner or the pool. Are other pools also reporting lower hashrate? If not, then perhaps switch pool, if you see same hashrate also on other pools, then it may be a problem with miner.
I took a look at all the other pools, but they only got a few miners and aren't really attractive. I don't got an account at Dedicatedpool (and I think you aren't able to register a new one though), so some of the existing miners at Dedicatedpool should hop into another pool. IF we want to spread the total hashrate ofcourse.
I seem to be getting 1/5 of scrypt K on all my cards...
That is approximately what is expected, at Nfactor 10 most cards are running about 40% - 45% of scrypt hashrate and increasing Nfactor by one means the hashrate approximately halves (unless running into some lack of memory or other limitation, in that case it can drop to less than a half)
Also, I am mining on dedicatedpool.com and it says my workers have a lot less kh than they really do and the difficulty there doesn't match the 28 that appear when I'm mining or that's written in their blocks, anyone know for this? Appreciate the help!
Try another pool? As I see it now, dedicatedpool.com has about 80% - 90% of network hashrate, so while there are no indication they'll do something evil (like some sort 51% attack) with that it would be better to spread the hashrate more evenly. There are 4 other pools and many p2pool nodes.
The diff reported by the pool often fluctuates between about half and double of the real value, but if it stays significantly below the real value, then something is wrong with either the miner or the pool. Are other pools also reporting lower hashrate? If not, then perhaps switch pool, if you see same hashrate also on other pools, then it may be a problem with miner.
Also, I am mining on dedicatedpool.com and it says my workers have a lot less kh than they really do and the difficulty there doesn't match the 28 that appear when I'm mining or that's written in their blocks, anyone know for this? Appreciate the help!
290: --thread-concurrency 32765,32765,32765 --intensity 19,19,19 --worksize 512,512,512 (Getting 160k)
_+20
1000
1500
270x: -w 256 -I 17 --thread-concurrency 20480 -g 1 (Getting 90k)
0
1080
1500
_+20
1000
1500
270x: -w 256 -I 17 --thread-concurrency 20480 -g 1 (Getting 90k)
0
1080
1500
I seem to be getting 1/5 of scrypt K on all my cards...
SHould I only be getting 160k on 290s?
that seems quite low
SHould I only be getting 160k on 290s?
Also is there a config on 270 and 270x?
Also is there a config on 270 and 270x?
Seems cach starting to take off on cryptsy, volume doubled in less than 12 hours!
That's because an equipment vendor is accepting CACH as payment at the value of 0.01 BTC for 24 hours beginning on Monday. This is causing people to buy it up at a discounted rate to get a discount on the equipment.
Seems cach starting to take off on cryptsy, volume doubled in less than 12 hours!
First of all ty everybody for answering:
My cards are: 6970 (2gb) + 6950 (1Gb) + 6870 (1Gb),
I have better Hashrates now, my configs are:
(6870) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 14 --thread-concurrency 11520 -w 64
(6970,6950) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 17,12 -w 64,64 --thread-concurrency 24448,17280 --lookup-gap 2,3
And that is giving me:
59Kh/s on the 6870
71Kh/s on the 6970
58Kh/s on the 6950
I had to use lookup-gap 3 con the 6950, cause look-gap = 2 (default) was crashing my driver on that card.
I think my 6970 and my 6950 can do better, but I cant figured a better config.
My cards are: 6970 (2gb) + 6950 (1Gb) + 6870 (1Gb),
I have better Hashrates now, my configs are:
(6870) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 14 --thread-concurrency 11520 -w 64
(6970,6950) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 17,12 -w 64,64 --thread-concurrency 24448,17280 --lookup-gap 2,3
And that is giving me:
59Kh/s on the 6870
71Kh/s on the 6970
58Kh/s on the 6950
I had to use lookup-gap 3 con the 6950, cause look-gap = 2 (default) was crashing my driver on that card.
I think my 6970 and my 6950 can do better, but I cant figured a better config.
One of my R9 280x has to go back to the store due to a faulty fan. In the mean time I'll be using my spare 6970 with my other 280X. If I find some better settings for the 6970 I'll let you know.
First of all ty everybody for answering:
My cards are: 6970 (2gb) + 6950 (1Gb) + 6870 (1Gb),
I have better Hashrates now, my configs are:
(6870) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 14 --thread-concurrency 11520 -w 64
(6970,6950) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 17,12 -w 64,64 --thread-concurrency 24448,17280 --lookup-gap 2,3
And that is giving me:
59Kh/s on the 6870
71Kh/s on the 6970
58Kh/s on the 6950
I had to use lookup-gap 3 con the 6950, cause look-gap = 2 (default) was crashing my driver on that card.
I think my 6970 and my 6950 can do better, but I cant figured a better config.
My cards are: 6970 (2gb) + 6950 (1Gb) + 6870 (1Gb),
I have better Hashrates now, my configs are:
(6870) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 14 --thread-concurrency 11520 -w 64
(6970,6950) cgminer --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364 -u xxx -p xxx -I 17,12 -w 64,64 --thread-concurrency 24448,17280 --lookup-gap 2,3
And that is giving me:
59Kh/s on the 6870
71Kh/s on the 6970
58Kh/s on the 6950
I had to use lookup-gap 3 con the 6950, cause look-gap = 2 (default) was crashing my driver on that card.
I think my 6970 and my 6950 can do better, but I cant figured a better config.
I don't have much of better information than I've posted already on pool's homepage on http://cach.catcoin.cz/
I have some working config reportedly working from someone using HD 7970 with current Nfactor, but I have no better information for R9 290 (it is often hard to find some universal config, what works on once card, crashes another one - sometimes even if that another is of same type and in same PC). So it is often taking some config as a baseline and then try fiddling with vital parameters (intensity, thread-concurrency, lookup-gap, ...)
Some hints to parameter configuration can be also found at https://github.com/Thirtybird/YACMiner/blob/master/SCRYPT-README
HD 7970 config:
I have some working config reportedly working from someone using HD 7970 with current Nfactor, but I have no better information for R9 290 (it is often hard to find some universal config, what works on once card, crashes another one - sometimes even if that another is of same type and in same PC). So it is often taking some config as a baseline and then try fiddling with vital parameters (intensity, thread-concurrency, lookup-gap, ...)
Some hints to parameter configuration can be also found at https://github.com/Thirtybird/YACMiner/blob/master/SCRYPT-README
HD 7970 config:
Code:
"scrypt-jane" : true,
"sj-nfmin" : "4",
"sj-nfmax" : "30",
"sj-time" : "1388949883",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-engine" : "1080",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-fan" : "60-100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"thread-concurrency" : "16000",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"auto-fan" : true,
"failover-only" : true,
"no-restart" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "93",
"temp-target" : "75",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0"
}
"sj-nfmin" : "4",
"sj-nfmax" : "30",
"sj-time" : "1388949883",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-engine" : "1080",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-fan" : "60-100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"thread-concurrency" : "16000",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"auto-fan" : true,
"failover-only" : true,
"no-restart" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "93",
"temp-target" : "75",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0"
}
Guys any help for 6970??? I cant get above 45Kh/s over card , also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/s
, also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/sWhat options (config file, parameters...) are you using? Any undervolting/overclocking/etc.. ?
Also, how much VRAM does your cards have? At this nfactor, VRAM could be a limitation, sometimes solvable by increasing the lookup gap.
As a blind shot, try increasing the lookup gap and see if that squeezes more hashes out of it.
If that does not work - please post your configs/params you use, you may get a better advice once we see them
I posted all that info and no one helps me with my R9 290's why is that
Guys any help for 6970??? I cant get above 45Kh/s over card , also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/s
, also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/sWhat options (config file, parameters...) are you using? Any undervolting/overclocking/etc.. ?
Also, how much VRAM does your cards have? At this nfactor, VRAM could be a limitation, sometimes solvable by increasing the lookup gap.
As a blind shot, try increasing the lookup gap and see if that squeezes more hashes out of it.
If that does not work - please post your configs/params you use, you may get a better advice once we see them
Guys any help for 6970??? I cant get avobe 45Kh/s over card , also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/s
, also I have a 6870 and I get 25Kh/s Would be great if you could add the CrunchHarder CACHeCoin pool as well https://cache.crunchharder.net and help spread the hash around!
Your pool already is (and was) there, except it has a typo in its name, it is labeled as "Crush Harder pool".
Kalgecin, can you fix the typo?
Fixed
Jump to: