Topic: [ANN]|Chatcoin|NIST5|Chat in Wallet|No premine|P2P Private Chat|No vote - page 4. (Read 48911 times)
August 28, 2014, 10:44:04 AM
talkcoin is confirmed to be taken over by a new team.
August 28, 2014, 10:01:44 AM
could we have a faster block explorer?
I will contact the explorer dev to fix it August 28, 2014, 10:00:02 AM
DEV,please be quick,tac is going to remove vote feature soon.
I am travelling in japan…, dev team will restart after 9th Sep August 28, 2014, 03:45:25 AM
could we have a faster block explorer?
August 27, 2014, 01:25:01 PM
DEV,please be quick,tac is going to remove vote feature soon.
Dev disspeared again 
August 26, 2014, 08:10:43 PM
DEV,please be quick,tac is going to remove vote feature soon.
August 26, 2014, 02:09:21 AM
so easy to mine,I'll mine and hold some
August 25, 2014, 11:26:44 AM
@Dev,
are you developping chat on your own or with a team?
are you developping chat on your own or with a team?
August 23, 2014, 12:16:14 PM
Hi all,
I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
good to see Dev getting active here I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
August 23, 2014, 05:09:52 AM
Hi all,
I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
You should put this info on the OP as part of roadmap I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
August 23, 2014, 01:36:36 AM
Hi all,
I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
really a good idea,looking forward to that... I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
August 22, 2014, 12:56:05 PM
Hi all,
I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
I am considering making the ichat be able to send an attachment to other people by paying a few chatcoins to the nodes processing this. this will make the ichat a decentralized email. the chatcoin will be a stamp fee to the attachment file ? is it a good idea?
but it maybe a hard work...
August 19, 2014, 12:43:08 AM
Code:
Value vote2(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
throw runtime_error(
"votedev\n"
"Percentage to be given to developers 0-10");
if (nSubsidy <= 0)
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_CLIENT_NOT_CONNECTED, "Invalid Subsidy");
if (!(params[0].get_real() >= 0 && params[0].get_real() <= 10))
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid Percentage");
int64 nVote2 = nSubsidy * params[0].get_real() / 100;
CChatcoinAddress address(GetVote2Addr());
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid Chatcoin address");
// Amount
int64 nAmount = GetVote2Value();
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
wtx.mapValue["to"] = GetVote2Lbl();
if (pwalletMain->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = pwalletMain->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, false, nVote2);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
what's this?
but this function has been closed in chatcoin. charity is set to 2% for chatcoin
and most coin has been spent for giveaway
August 15, 2014, 07:25:37 AM
Code:
Value vote2(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
throw runtime_error(
"votedev\n"
"Percentage to be given to developers 0-10");
if (nSubsidy <= 0)
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_CLIENT_NOT_CONNECTED, "Invalid Subsidy");
if (!(params[0].get_real() >= 0 && params[0].get_real() <= 10))
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid Percentage");
int64 nVote2 = nSubsidy * params[0].get_real() / 100;
CChatcoinAddress address(GetVote2Addr());
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid Chatcoin address");
// Amount
int64 nAmount = GetVote2Value();
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
wtx.mapValue["to"] = GetVote2Lbl();
if (pwalletMain->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = pwalletMain->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, false, nVote2);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
what's this?
August 14, 2014, 04:59:30 AM
TalkCoin is climbing up rapidly now ,back to 1000 s already.who it the big whale?
Obviously,the big whale is the Dev ,you can check it from BE. August 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PM
Chatcoin:
From block 1 to 70000, the reward perblock is 64 CHAT per block, but the dev get 1.28 CHAT per block！ SUM 65.28 CHAT per block.
1.28 CHAT sent to address CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL.
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/block.asp?blockid=1
Blockid 1
Blockhash 0000f280e0b09dc3f7b833bab0eb9e05ad10cc00c99f5af96982d8b12e5c3f10
txid ebac795ecf7d8b2e8e24993ec4e39a68bd3a6127b85920089b43c2e1df0c9eea
CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL: 1.28 TAC
CX9CJtBnaH9TQycJKcEDePRfu2RuKJv235: 64 TAC
Yeah,I've checked it.much cleaner than Talkcoin From block 1 to 70000, the reward perblock is 64 CHAT per block, but the dev get 1.28 CHAT per block！ SUM 65.28 CHAT per block.
1.28 CHAT sent to address CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL.
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/block.asp?blockid=1
Blockid 1
Blockhash 0000f280e0b09dc3f7b833bab0eb9e05ad10cc00c99f5af96982d8b12e5c3f10
txid ebac795ecf7d8b2e8e24993ec4e39a68bd3a6127b85920089b43c2e1df0c9eea
CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL: 1.28 TAC
CX9CJtBnaH9TQycJKcEDePRfu2RuKJv235: 64 TAC
August 13, 2014, 01:54:11 PM
Code:
Value vote2(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
throw runtime_error(
"votedev\n"
"Percentage to be given to developers 0-10");
if (nSubsidy <= 0)
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_CLIENT_NOT_CONNECTED, "Invalid Subsidy");
if (!(params[0].get_real() >= 0 && params[0].get_real() <= 10))
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid Percentage");
int64 nVote2 = nSubsidy * params[0].get_real() / 100;
CChatcoinAddress address(GetVote2Addr());
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid Chatcoin address");
// Amount
int64 nAmount = GetVote2Value();
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
wtx.mapValue["to"] = GetVote2Lbl();
if (pwalletMain->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = pwalletMain->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, false, nVote2);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
August 13, 2014, 01:37:14 PM
Chatcoin:
From block 1 to 70000, the reward perblock is 64 CHAT per block, but the dev get 1.28 CHAT per block！ SUM 65.28 CHAT per block.
1.28 CHAT sent to address CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL.
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/block.asp?blockid=1
Blockid 1
Blockhash 0000f280e0b09dc3f7b833bab0eb9e05ad10cc00c99f5af96982d8b12e5c3f10
txid ebac795ecf7d8b2e8e24993ec4e39a68bd3a6127b85920089b43c2e1df0c9eea
CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL: 1.28 TAC
CX9CJtBnaH9TQycJKcEDePRfu2RuKJv235: 64 TAC
From block 1 to 70000, the reward perblock is 64 CHAT per block, but the dev get 1.28 CHAT per block！ SUM 65.28 CHAT per block.
1.28 CHAT sent to address CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL.
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL
http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com/block.asp?blockid=1
Blockid 1
Blockhash 0000f280e0b09dc3f7b833bab0eb9e05ad10cc00c99f5af96982d8b12e5c3f10
txid ebac795ecf7d8b2e8e24993ec4e39a68bd3a6127b85920089b43c2e1df0c9eea
CPo7GK35wzvsy5qFG4294BR8VMG7ZfdKuL: 1.28 TAC
CX9CJtBnaH9TQycJKcEDePRfu2RuKJv235: 64 TAC
August 13, 2014, 09:00:24 AM
我们为什么要支持chatcoin而不是talkcoin。请大家先仔细考虑：
虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿？
这一点我想大家都明白：去中心化，规则确定，无人可以操控产量。
而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的，为什么这么说呢我的分析如下：
首先看talkcoin的特点：
1，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。
2，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。
3，这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的（如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥，因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以）
通过这两点可以得到这样的结果：
1，如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高，也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。
2，如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。（作者很阴险，从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则）。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40%
显然
这样的一个币，是不适合长期投资的
如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机.
请注意一点：人性是贪婪的！
所以请支持chatcoin
虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿？
这一点我想大家都明白：去中心化，规则确定，无人可以操控产量。
而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的，为什么这么说呢我的分析如下：
首先看talkcoin的特点：
1，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。
2，投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。
3，这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的（如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥，因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以）
通过这两点可以得到这样的结果：
1，如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高，也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。
2，如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。（作者很阴险，从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则）。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40%
显然
这样的一个币，是不适合长期投资的
如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机.
请注意一点：人性是贪婪的！
所以请支持chatcoin
August 13, 2014, 07:45:36 AM
@djm34
If you have solid evidence to prove what you said,show us,
if not,shut up.
Please act like a professional,if you are the one .
The fact that you ask for evidence is a proof on itself If you have solid evidence to prove what you said,show us,
if not,shut up.
Please act like a professional,if you are the one .
Stupid and shameless developper of sg-tac,you are so cute and childish,love you ,baby~~
I should thank you on behave of djm34. The fact is all miners for Nist5 using his creation, that includes your beloved Chatcoin
Jump to: