Author

Topic: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" - page 462. (Read 1151252 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1063
Merit: 253
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
it seems my wallet refuses to sync after block 34001

Hard fork. Install the newer client.

i'm using the 1.4.2b client but it will not go further then 34001



edit: fixed by reloading the chain


Same issue again, wallet will not sync :s

It staked for a few day's and then it did'nt sync anymore

is it only me that's having this problem?


Is it stuck at block 34001 again?

If so, that's a hard-fork problem.

If not, try adding these lines to your clam.conf file and restarting:

addnode=24.20.184.148
addnode=65.102.47.162
addnode=66.169.88.135
addnode=75.131.208.152
addnode=78.0.29.137
addnode=81.190.41.203
addnode=85.17.81.169
addnode=142.4.201.123
addnode=207.61.182.125
addnode=216.46.33.120
addnode=220.253.2.201

Hi,thx or help

 its stuck @ 43848 now

i added the nodes but still no luck

tried clam.conf and Clam.conf.

i'm going to try reloading the blockchain all over again :s



and that fixed it again hmm
sr. member
Activity: 1063
Merit: 253
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
it seems my wallet refuses to sync after block 34001

Hard fork. Install the newer client.

i'm using the 1.4.2b client but it will not go further then 34001



edit: fixed by reloading the chain


Same issue again, wallet will not sync :s

It staked for a few day's and then it did'nt sync anymore

is it only me that's having this problem?


Is it stuck at block 34001 again?

If so, that's a hard-fork problem.

If not, try adding these lines to your clam.conf file and restarting:

addnode=24.20.184.148
addnode=65.102.47.162
addnode=66.169.88.135
addnode=75.131.208.152
addnode=78.0.29.137
addnode=81.190.41.203
addnode=85.17.81.169
addnode=142.4.201.123
addnode=207.61.182.125
addnode=216.46.33.120
addnode=220.253.2.201

Hi,thx or help

 its stuck @ 43848 now

i added the nodes but still no luck

tried clam.conf and Clam.conf.

i'm going to try reloading the blockchain all over again :s

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
And now someone just sold 374.05139511 clams

The sell side has reduced by about that much, I'm thinking someone got tired of waiting.

I've been thinking for a while how much of a waste it is to have all those clams just sitting there when someone could have been staking them.

I expect the exchange is staking them.

In fact it wouldn't be hard to find out if you bought CLAMs from an exchange by tracing them back on the blockchain and see if they were staking before you withdrew them.

Yeah, you are probably right. This could possibly cause an issue though if too many coins were frozen in stake and someone wanted to make a large withdraw...They may have to wait a while.

Yes, that could be an issue. But I find that for the most part no more than 50% of my CLAM outputs are immature at any point in time, and usually it's much less, and also the exchange could make it clear that in extreme circumstances coins won't be immediately available for withdrawal. It's comparable to trying to withdraw coins from cold storage - you expect to have to wait while cold stored coins are moved back online.

I guess security could be an issue. In order to stake, you need to have your coins online and effectively not protected by encryption. I know there's an "unlock for staking only" option, but that's not really any protection at all against a determined hacker.
legendary
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
And now someone just sold 374.05139511 clams

The sell side has reduced by about that much, I'm thinking someone got tired of waiting.

I've been thinking for a while how much of a waste it is to have all those clams just sitting there when someone could have been staking them.

I expect the exchange is staking them.

In fact it wouldn't be hard to find out if you bought CLAMs from an exchange by tracing them back on the blockchain and see if they were staking before you withdrew them.

Yeah, you are probably right. This could possibly cause an issue though if too many coins were frozen in stake and someone wanted to make a large withdraw...They may have to wait a while.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
And now someone just sold 374.05139511 clams

The sell side has reduced by about that much, I'm thinking someone got tired of waiting.

I've been thinking for a while how much of a waste it is to have all those clams just sitting there when someone could have been staking them.

I expect the exchange is staking them.

In fact it wouldn't be hard to find out if you bought CLAMs from an exchange by tracing them back on the blockchain and see if they were staking before you withdrew them.

Edit: Well, OK, it looks to me very much like the exchange *isn't* staking them:



A 138 CLAM output with 22 days of age should stake very easily:

>>> 2**20 / (138.16 * 22)
345

ie. after about 345 seconds. It's inconceivable that it has been trying to stake for 22 days and not managed it.

On the one hand that does seem like a waste, but on the other hand that's better for the rest of us. Less competition, lower difficulty, more chance of winning lottery payouts.
legendary
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
And now someone just sold 374.05139511 clams

The sell side has reduced by about that much, I'm thinking someone got tired of waiting.

I've been thinking for a while how much of a waste it is to have all those clams just sitting there when someone could have been staking them.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
And now someone just sold 374.05139511 clams
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
So netstakeweight spiked... and then drop from > 200,000 to 8,833?
If that is in fact what happened?

It looks like someone dug up a whole bunch of old clams from the initial distribution, and let them all stake.

Old clams stake relatively easily, because chance of staking is proportional to age times value.

One they all staked once, their age will have been reset to zero, and so the rush of staking abated (until the next person digs up a bunch).

Weight is just the sum of (age-in-days times value-in-clams) of all outputs currently trying to stake.

Each old distribution output is 4.6 CLAMs, and about 74 days old. That gives each one a weight of 340 CLAM-days until it successfully stakes.

If the network weight went up by 200k, that suggests that around 600 (200k / 340) old 4.6 CLAM outputs were found in a single dig!

Edit:

That matches pretty closely with the number of addresses that have been claimed. A couple of days ago the IRC bot reported:

Quote
05:08 < SuperClam>  Amount Claimed:  9151.04055538 Clams, 1987 Addresses

And now it reports:

Quote
19:39 < SuperClam>  Amount Claimed: 12103.13768472 Clams, 2628 Addresses
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
it seems my wallet refuses to sync after block 34001

Hard fork. Install the newer client.

i'm using the 1.4.2b client but it will not go further then 34001



edit: fixed by reloading the chain


Same issue again, wallet will not sync :s

It staked for a few day's and then it did'nt sync anymore

is it only me that's having this problem?


I'm also having problems for the first time (all installations 1.4.2b for last 2 weeks).

2 clients working normally on 2 machines...
A 3rd client on a 3rd machine pops up then "not responding" so just freezes...
(Nothing helps this one even total reinstallation).

And clients installed on 2 fresh PCs not connecting at all for many hours...
Even with those nodes (though you should post a full config file)...
Why would "debug" have "addnode" removed?

So netstakeweight spiked... and then drop from > 200,000 to 8,833?
If that is in fact what happened?


I'm also having issues for the f
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
it seems my wallet refuses to sync after block 34001

Hard fork. Install the newer client.

i'm using the 1.4.2b client but it will not go further then 34001



edit: fixed by reloading the chain


Same issue again, wallet will not sync :s

It staked for a few day's and then it did'nt sync anymore

is it only me that's having this problem?


Is it stuck at block 34001 again?

If so, that's a hard-fork problem.

If not, try adding these lines to your clam.conf file and restarting:

addnode=24.20.184.148
addnode=65.102.47.162
addnode=66.169.88.135
addnode=75.131.208.152
addnode=78.0.29.137
addnode=81.190.41.203
addnode=85.17.81.169
addnode=142.4.201.123
addnode=207.61.182.125
addnode=216.46.33.120
addnode=220.253.2.201
sr. member
Activity: 1063
Merit: 253
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
it seems my wallet refuses to sync after block 34001

Hard fork. Install the newer client.

i'm using the 1.4.2b client but it will not go further then 34001



edit: fixed by reloading the chain


Same issue again, wallet will not sync :s

It staked for a few day's and then it did'nt sync anymore

is it only me that's having this problem?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1000
Bass Player
Yeah, the network weight has dropped to 60052..

Look like your analysis is correct...
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
I think someone dug up a WHOLE LOT of old clams. If you look at the block explorer, almost all of the new stakes are on stacks of 4.60545574.

216 of the most recent 232 blocks (all but 16) were freshly dug 4.60545574 CLAM outputs.

Only 1 of the 38 blocks before that were freshly dug.

That explains it then. The weight seems to be dropping again now, so I guess this batch is nearing its end (maybe 2/3rds don looking at the numbers).

I hope it's lots of new CLAM diggers and not just 1 but who knows...
legendary
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
I think someone dug up a WHOLE LOT of old clams. If you look at the block explorer, almost all of the new stakes are on stacks of 4.60545574.

216 of the most recent 232 blocks (all but 16) were freshly dug 4.60545574 CLAM outputs.

Only 1 of the 38 blocks before that were freshly dug.

Maybe an exchange, or gambling site? It is still mostly fresh clams staking. They must have a very substantial amount(assuming it is one person, but my bet is it is).
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
I think someone dug up a WHOLE LOT of old clams. If you look at the block explorer, almost all of the new stakes are on stacks of 4.60545574.

216 of the most recent 232 blocks (all but 16) were freshly dug 4.60545574 CLAM outputs.

Only 1 of the 38 blocks before that were freshly dug.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
That means that each of your 4.6 CLAM outputs has a 2^20 / (4.6 * age_in_days) chance of staking each second.

If I have 50 clams, odds are I am going to hit the same number of PoS blocks in a year no matter if those clams are in one pile or spread out in little piles over 100 different addresses.  EXCEPT for that long confirmation time of 510 blocks.

Do I got this right?

If what I said was true, your conclusion is also true.

However... Smiley

I missed out a small detail, and your real chance of staking (per second) is 1 in:

2^20 / int(value_in_CLAMs * age_in_days)

ie. the weight of your output is rounded down to an integer number of CLAM-days.

That means that if you split your outputs up into 0.01 CLAM units, they have (effectively) zero chance of staking until they are 100 days old.  (I say "effectively" because if your output rolls a zero in the sha256 hash, it stakes. But that (effectively) never happens).

Note also that the 2^20 is for minimum difficulty. At the moment we're at around 10 times minimum difficulty, so you need to decrease your chance by a factor of 10 until the recently dug CLAM mother lode finishes its initial round of staking.

I've not seen an analysis of the best stake size given these two constraints.

Oh, and there's a 3rd constraint: no output is allowed to stake within 4 hours of its previous movement (staking or transacting).
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
Anyone else noticed a higher number of "Generated but not accepted" recently? Over the last 2 days I've had 20%.... 2 out of the last 10.

Maybe the number of coins I'm staking is too low (5-8 per "pile")?

Am using build v1.4.2.0-47-g7fecba1.

No, I've noticed quite the opposite.

I used to get one or two per day, and recently I've seen none for 4 days.

I think it's just a question of luck. If you and I both try to stake a block at the same time, only one of us can succeed. Whichever of us has the better connection to the network "wins".

Note that it doesn't really matter - if an output stakes but that block isn't accepted, the output keeps its previous weight and so gets to stake again relatively quickly.
legendary
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
Definitely looks like more and more people are discovering clams... network weight WAY up:



201700   ( wow )




I think someone dug up a WHOLE LOT of old clams. If you look at the block explorer, almost all of the new stakes are on stacks of 4.60545574.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1000
Bass Player
Definitely looks like more and more people are discovering clams... network weight WAY up:



201700   ( wow )

member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
Wow my client is currently reporting the network weight as 178,365. Never seen it that high before....

Output from getstakinginfo:

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00438567,
"search-interval" : 1,
"weight" : 28,
"netstakeweight" : 178365,
"expectedtime" : 31850
}


My tiny piles make take a while to stake now.....
Jump to: