Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][CON] PayCon™ HI POS | LiteStake | Multisend | TOR | Android - page 64. (Read 179167 times)

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
I am currently averaging between 1-1.5% per day on 220k, the best sized Blocks for me are between 100-300 with a small range of smaller Blocks (40-80) so I can also have some that will hit for bigger rewards. I am aiming to only have 10% of my Coin not Staking at any given time and use as little weight as possible but currently have about 15% under 2 days age. I have about 1430 Blocks which gives my average Block of 150 Coins, current Stake weight is around 765k but should max out at around 1 million weight. The setstakeplitthreshold will split blocks if it can create 2 Blocks larger than the amount set, the combine threshold will take multiple Blocks under the amount set and combine them along with the reward into one Block. There shouldn't be a need to set the age to combine lower than max age but if you would like to change the age at which they will start combining (seeing as you can compile), it is located in wallet.cpp line 22
Thanks for the info. I've currently setted the split threshold to 150 though my weight is like half yours while my con amount is ~10k less yours, but that's probably because your fix didn't take full effect yet. With 150 blocks i shouldn't hit the max age. I'll run the numbers in a week from now and see how i'm doing.
Now that i'm thinking, if you have ~750k weight with 220k, shouldn't there be a lot more network weight with that giant 1 million Con address that is atop of the richlist?
Edit: Nvm he's 800k now, but that's still pretty massive.

Well more efficiency can be achieved by adjusting your thresholds as you go and maximizing your weight so a very large wallet may not be able to achieve as much if not properly managed. You would quite easily be able to match inflation (0.5% per day currently) but to split hairs, that is the difference between gaining 0.5% per day and gaining 1.5% per day but there is also a set amount of coins produced per day so as more people become more efficient that also lowers the amount for other people so if there are also many people with very small Blocks then you may also need larger Blocks. The Staking is actually really good, it allows more rewards for being more competitive.
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
I am currently averaging between 1-1.5% per day on 220k, the best sized Blocks for me are between 100-300 with a small range of smaller Blocks (40-80) so I can also have some that will hit for bigger rewards. I am aiming to only have 10% of my Coin not Staking at any given time and use as little weight as possible but currently have about 15% under 2 days age. I have about 1430 Blocks which gives my average Block of 150 Coins, current Stake weight is around 765k but should max out at around 1 million weight. The setstakeplitthreshold will split blocks if it can create 2 Blocks larger than the amount set, the combine threshold will take multiple Blocks under the amount set and combine them along with the reward into one Block. There shouldn't be a need to set the age to combine lower than max age but if you would like to change the age at which they will start combining (seeing as you can compile), it is located in wallet.cpp line 22
Thanks for the info. I've currently setted the split threshold to 150 though my weight is like half yours while my con amount is ~10k less yours, but that's probably because your fix didn't take full effect yet. With 150 blocks i shouldn't hit the max age. I'll run the numbers in a week from now and see how i'm doing.
Now that i'm thinking, if you have ~750k weight with 220k, shouldn't there be a lot more network weight with that giant 1 million Con address that is atop of the richlist?
Edit: Nvm he's 800k now, but that's still pretty massive.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
Hey so I had the latest changes rebuilt but there was some bug introduced that is making the Bluish-White Theme not display properly. Version 1.0.6 is fine but Version 1.0.7 it looks all funky, I figured it was the Mac changes but it isn't.
I've been on Vacation for the last 3 weeks but I head back to work tomorrow.
I'll throw down a 10k CON bounty to whoever can find and fix the bug that is causing the display issue in the Bluish-White Theme between version 1.0.6 and 1.0.7
In what way? My themes are all conned up can't really tell, could ye post a screen?

setstakesplitthreshold is for how the wallet handles the outputs of your stakes. If you have it set to 350 it won't split your stake output into two blocks unless they will both be over 350 in size.  The calculations for it I have found aren't perfect. So it is possible to get one close to the edge that doesn't go exactly as planned. I will try to work with crest to refine this code over time.
Nvm press, he pushed version 1.0.7 and the split/combine threshold seems to work flawlessly.

The glitch is only on Windows, I'm redoing my build kit so I can test and build more myself but won't have as much time today. I've had the last few weeks off since I moved, thought it was about time to get back to work so yesterday I applied at the place I wanted and start today, lol

Here is a picture




Here is some of the Stakes I've done the last few days so that it may help you with your Block sizing.

6/23 - 2460
6/22 - 2220.55
6/21 - 2490
6/20 - 3240

I am currently averaging between 1-1.5% per day on 220k, the best sized Blocks for me are between 100-300 with a small range of smaller Blocks (40-80) so I can also have some that will hit for bigger rewards. I am aiming to only have 10% of my Coin not Staking at any given time and use as little weight as possible but currently have about 15% under 2 days age. I have about 1430 Blocks which gives my average Block of 150 Coins, current Stake weight is around 765k but should max out at around 1 million weight. The setstakeplitthreshold will split blocks if it can create 2 Blocks larger than the amount set, the combine threshold will take multiple Blocks under the amount set and combine them along with the reward into one Block. There shouldn't be a need to set the age to combine lower than max age but if you would like to change the age at which they will start combining (seeing as you can compile), it is located in wallet.cpp line 22
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
Hey so I had the latest changes rebuilt but there was some bug introduced that is making the Bluish-White Theme not display properly. Version 1.0.6 is fine but Version 1.0.7 it looks all funky, I figured it was the Mac changes but it isn't.
I've been on Vacation for the last 3 weeks but I head back to work tomorrow.
I'll throw down a 10k CON bounty to whoever can find and fix the bug that is causing the display issue in the Bluish-White Theme between version 1.0.6 and 1.0.7
In what way? My themes are all conned up can't really tell, could ye post a screen?

setstakesplitthreshold is for how the wallet handles the outputs of your stakes. If you have it set to 350 it won't split your stake output into two blocks unless they will both be over 350 in size.  The calculations for it I have found aren't perfect. So it is possible to get one close to the edge that doesn't go exactly as planned. I will try to work with crest to refine this code over time.
Nvm press, he pushed version 1.0.7 and the split/combine threshold seems to work flawlessly.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024


It's Windows 8, but why would Microsoft name a program after Paycon?  Can we as a community expect a class action settlement?

Someone let Microsoft know for sure (twitter?). That´s not correct  named a simple console whatever process same / after our digital currency of future.

What has constand.exe to do with it


*conhost.exe

Maybe we can Con them into changing the name to PayConhost.exe? and will automatically install the PayCon wallet? I hear Steve Ballmer is a pretty nice guy, I don't think it would take too much Convincing.

Hey so I had the latest changes rebuilt but there was some bug introduced that is making the Bluish-White Theme not display properly. Version 1.0.6 is fine but Version 1.0.7 it looks all funky, I figured it was the Mac changes but it isn't.

I've been on Vacation for the last 3 weeks but I head back to work tomorrow.

I'll throw down a 10k CON bounty to whoever can find and fix the bug that is causing the display issue in the Bluish-White Theme between version 1.0.6 and 1.0.7
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000


It's Windows 8, but why would Microsoft name a program after Paycon?  Can we as a community expect a class action settlement?

Someone let Microsoft know for sure (twitter?). That´s not correct  named a simple console whatever process same / after our digital currency of future.

What has constand.exe to do with it


*conhost.exe
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
Looks like Con tookover Cryptsy,not bad,20$ per con very near

Awesome news. I knew something BIG will happen soon™er or later with PayCon Smiley


I have 4 instances of conhost.exe running under system, then one running under user, and one running as system service

It´s a  legitimate executable windows process. Nothing to do with PayCon Wink

http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/4996/what-is-conhost.exe-and-why-is-it-running/


It’s a completely legitimate executable—as long as it’s running from the system32 folder, and is signed by Microsoft.
The conhost.exe process fixes a fundamental problem in the way previous versions of Windows handled console windows, which broke drag & drop in Vista.
If you look at the details of the process from within Process Explorer, you’ll notice that the ComSpec is set to cmd.exe, a clear indication that it’s hosting the command prompt.
  ....

So now you know what the conhost.exe process does, and why you should never attempt to delete it. Ever.


You still using Win 7 ?
















It's Windows 8, but why would Microsoft name a program after Paycon?  Can we as a community expect a class action settlement?
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Looks like Con tookover Cryptsy,not bad,20$ per con very near

Awesome news. I knew something BIG will happen soon™er or later with PayCon Smiley


I have 4 instances of conhost.exe running under system, then one running under user, and one running as system service

It´s a  legitimate executable windows process. Nothing to do with PayCon Wink

http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/4996/what-is-conhost.exe-and-why-is-it-running/


It’s a completely legitimate executable—as long as it’s running from the system32 folder, and is signed by Microsoft.
The conhost.exe process fixes a fundamental problem in the way previous versions of Windows handled console windows, which broke drag & drop in Vista.
If you look at the details of the process from within Process Explorer, you’ll notice that the ComSpec is set to cmd.exe, a clear indication that it’s hosting the command prompt.
  ....

So now you know what the conhost.exe process does, and why you should never attempt to delete it. Ever.


You still using Win 7 ?














sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
I have 4 instances of conhost.exe running under system, then one running under user, and one running as system service
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
Hey crest i'm not sure what's going on, i setted setstakesplitthreshold to 350, but somehow i find blocks of 700+
Could it be that it's combining my 340 blocks?

setstakesplitthreshold is for how the wallet handles the outputs of your stakes. If you have it set to 350 it won't split your stake output into two blocks unless they will both be over 350 in size.  The calculations for it I have found aren't perfect. So it is possible to get one close to the edge that doesn't go exactly as planned. I will try to work with crest to refine this code over time.
Pab
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1012
Social
 
Website https://paycon.pw redirects to https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=341





Looks like Con tookover Cryptsy,not bad,20$ per con very near
hero member
Activity: 655
Merit: 500
BXT BitToken - No premine - Fair launch
Social
 
Website https://paycon.pw redirects to https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=341


legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
I'm also going to add in those helpers for 64 bit

Can you tell me if this is correct for you?

transactiontablemodel.cpp

line 553          return (qlonglong)rec->status.depth;

and

walletmodel.h

line 9  #include "uint256_t.h"  
Yup. The version I'm building only needs the walletmodel.h, the other one is already fixed.

Great, updated that now, tested out on 32 bit and also builds properly so you shouldn't need to edit that anymore to build from source.
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
I'm also going to add in those helpers for 64 bit

Can you tell me if this is correct for you?

transactiontablemodel.cpp

line 553          return (qlonglong)rec->status.depth;

and

walletmodel.h

line 9  #include "uint256_t.h"  
Yup. The version I'm building only needs the walletmodel.h, the other one is already fixed.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
Nice, i'l build it right away Smiley

I'm also going to add in those helpers for 64 bit

Can you tell me if this is correct for you?

transactiontablemodel.cpp

line 553          return (qlonglong)rec->status.depth;

and

walletmodel.h

line 9  #include "uint256_t.h" 
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
Nice, i'l build it right away Smiley
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
Hey crest i'm not sure what's going on, i setted setstakesplitthreshold to 350, but somehow i find blocks of 700+
Could it be that it's combining my 340 blocks?

Yes, that is what I have changed and you can compile from the latest source and it won't combine those Blocks anymore.

I was trying to figure out why it was combining Blocks so early, turns out it was combining all Blocks under 500 if older and the minimum age. I changed it now that it won't combine multiple Blocks unless older than the maximum age and only less than 30 Coins (however you can change it now to be higher if you want in your PayCon.conf file)

You can see these 2 commits to help you understand what I mean.

https://github.com/Crestington/PayCon/commit/cdd4058f7cf2dadc7a3ea83b165ae8f269ce09d8 which refactored to work of the maximum threshold.

https://github.com/Crestington/PayCon/commit/885ecda9180dad9564d75e5d95ca3ad7818d4124 which readjusted the threshold even lower but now allows users to set their own combine threshold past the max age.
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
Hey crest i'm not sure what's going on, i setted setstakesplitthreshold to 350, but somehow i find blocks of 700+
Could it be that it's combining my 340 blocks?
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
I have updated the source to fix the Bluish-White theme as well as updated the forums in the social tab to now link to the PayCon sub-forum on the GetHashing forums. The Change for Mac for the themes has been moved to it's own separate branch for now to build from. Version 1.0.7 Should be ready tomorrowish.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024

This is a little bit Beta, the bluish-white theme isn't displaying properly which was a change to help the theme's on Mac devices so it will look like I will have to revert a previous commit. Always 2 steps forward and 1 steps back but it will be better Staking-Wise by a fairly large margin.

I have been testing all the thresholds over the last week and by changing the combine thresholds, I have been able to Stake with much lower amounts in each Block (typically around 100-200 Coins at the 7 day mark) giving me nearly 100% more Coins per day.

The reason for this is that it would take a smaller Block to Stake (such as 120 Coins), accept that Block and then add multiple other Blocks until over 500 Coins and pay the 30 Coin reward. What you want is that it will not sweep up other smaller Blocks and still have those small Blocks competing for Stake unless it has begun to hit the maximum age so that you can hit POS Blocks with lower amounts of 100-300 Coins and achieve higher rewards and expend less weight in each Block. This would give you more Blocks competing for Stake which will give you more chance to hit each Block. I've hit POS Block with as little as 30 Coins but now that there is essentially no multiple combines until past the 14 day mark, there would be a fairly big increase in the POS difficulty. Increase in the difficulty is good for the network, it provides more security of the network and will create a more average reward among all the users Staking.
Pages:
Jump to: