Around 150 BTC has been raised till now, am I right?
Thanks
Yes, somewhere around that number.Thanks
Is that enough to work full time on this?
Topic: [ANN][CRAIG] CraigsCoin | CLASSIFIED ADS ON BLOCKCHAIN 5+ POD BITTREX, CRYPTSY - page 135. (Read 257879 times)
September 21, 2014, 07:53:17 AM
Is that enough to work full time on this?
September 21, 2014, 07:50:45 AM
Around 150 BTC has been raised till now, am I right?
Thanks
Yes, somewhere around that number. Thanks
September 21, 2014, 07:49:52 AM
So old ads just bloat the blockchain forever?
In this build - yes. However if you read OP I have plans on changing that. 
September 21, 2014, 07:41:15 AM
So old ads just bloat the blockchain forever?
September 21, 2014, 07:37:42 AM
Around 150 BTC has been raised till now, am I right?
Thanks
Thanks
September 21, 2014, 06:42:46 AM
When does the ICO end?
read the OP man, theres a countdown there
September 21, 2014, 06:34:43 AM
When does the ICO end?
September 21, 2014, 05:57:46 AM
Current development:
1. Brand new Ad posting design, that adds many possible filtering criteria for user Ads (it is already released, 2 days for testing);
2. Website that is parsing the blockchain Ads listing and filtering possibility (by the end of Sep 28 week);
3. API for parsing the blockchain ads for any third-party developers (by the end of Sep 28 week);
4. Image parser (your images will be displayed in the walltet) (by the end of first week of October);
5. Blockchain partial download – in order to avoid bloated blockchain being downloaded by every single node only blocks higher than certain threshold will be downloaded;
6. Digital auction house – addition an auction feature within posted ads. Each bidder with send coins to her designated address, and only the funds of the winning bidder will be locked in. These funds will be exchanged for the purchased goods/service between the winner and the seller simultaneously.
1. Brand new Ad posting design, that adds many possible filtering criteria for user Ads (it is already released, 2 days for testing);
2. Website that is parsing the blockchain Ads listing and filtering possibility (by the end of Sep 28 week);
3. API for parsing the blockchain ads for any third-party developers (by the end of Sep 28 week);
4. Image parser (your images will be displayed in the walltet) (by the end of first week of October);
5. Blockchain partial download – in order to avoid bloated blockchain being downloaded by every single node only blocks higher than certain threshold will be downloaded;
6. Digital auction house – addition an auction feature within posted ads. Each bidder with send coins to her designated address, and only the funds of the winning bidder will be locked in. These funds will be exchanged for the purchased goods/service between the winner and the seller simultaneously.
Awesome update! PMed you to get testcoins
Can you please PM this account - its pain to relog
September 21, 2014, 05:21:03 AM
Current development:
1. Brand new Ad posting design, that adds many possible filtering criteria for user Ads (it is already released, 2 days for testing);
2. Website that is parsing the blockchain Ads listing and filtering possibility (by the end of Sep 28 week);
3. API for parsing the blockchain ads for any third-party developers (by the end of Sep 28 week);
4. Image parser (your images will be displayed in the walltet) (by the end of first week of October);
5. Blockchain partial download – in order to avoid bloated blockchain being downloaded by every single node only blocks higher than certain threshold will be downloaded;
6. Digital auction house – addition an auction feature within posted ads. Each bidder with send coins to her designated address, and only the funds of the winning bidder will be locked in. These funds will be exchanged for the purchased goods/service between the winner and the seller simultaneously.
1. Brand new Ad posting design, that adds many possible filtering criteria for user Ads (it is already released, 2 days for testing);
2. Website that is parsing the blockchain Ads listing and filtering possibility (by the end of Sep 28 week);
3. API for parsing the blockchain ads for any third-party developers (by the end of Sep 28 week);
4. Image parser (your images will be displayed in the walltet) (by the end of first week of October);
5. Blockchain partial download – in order to avoid bloated blockchain being downloaded by every single node only blocks higher than certain threshold will be downloaded;
6. Digital auction house – addition an auction feature within posted ads. Each bidder with send coins to her designated address, and only the funds of the winning bidder will be locked in. These funds will be exchanged for the purchased goods/service between the winner and the seller simultaneously.
Awesome update! PMed you to get testcoins
September 21, 2014, 04:35:30 AM
Lol.. Another scam and a group of people supporting it with troll comments about the future price.
Is there any particular reason for you to say things like that?
September 21, 2014, 04:31:28 AM
Lol.. Another scam and a group of people supporting it with troll comments about the future price.
Is there any particular reason for you to say things like that? September 21, 2014, 04:31:01 AM
Lol.. Another scam and a group of people supporting it with troll comments about the future price.
Who is talking price?
September 21, 2014, 04:29:37 AM
Lol.. Another scam and a group of people supporting it with troll comments about the future price.
September 21, 2014, 04:24:01 AM
MineralsPR
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
Tally Ho! I see signs of the first troll of the season!
Check my post history, I am no fudder.
Its a genuine question that I would like to understand how this situation will be handled.
Dont you think questions should be asked? Or should we all just post rocket pics and talk about moon all the time.
Point taken, apologies. After months of Troll War I tend to shoot on sight without looking at the situation.
He has to worry more about political stuff. He is in Moscow supposedly. If someone starts posting anti-Putin diatribes, gay stuff, pro-Ukraine stuff etc. he might get a midnight visit from some new friends who don't want to understand about P2P networks, etc.
The guy really really needs a kill switch for bad content.
Cloak (before their shitstorm) were going to have a jury type system where the adds would go to 10 or so random volunteer nodes for approval. If a node disproved of the add but the majority approved of the add then the add would get uploaded. And anyone who disproved would be charged a small fee. All people who approved the add would be paid a small fee for their effort. Now if the majority disproved of the add then only those who disproved would be paid the fee and those that approved a unpopular add would pay the fee.
This way the community can decide what adds are shown. So for example we we could be ok with people selling pot but not bombs.
What you suggested is a modetarion algorithm, to make joury decide wjat is appropriate and what is not. I btw believe that something may be appropriate in Russia and not Appropriate in US (and vice versa), so this wont work.
WHat I was talking about was seller rating system to prevent fraud sells/buys.
Problem is, that when A sells things to B, B must tell everyone that A is a good/bad seller somehow. So when C decided to buy from A will make decision based on B's oppinion.
Also someone could sell to themselves a few times and build a false trust rating.
That is exactly my point. The only way to do rating system effectively a number of 3d party sites must be established with real customers and real moderators.
September 21, 2014, 04:15:44 AM
MineralsPR
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
Tally Ho! I see signs of the first troll of the season!
Check my post history, I am no fudder.
Its a genuine question that I would like to understand how this situation will be handled.
Dont you think questions should be asked? Or should we all just post rocket pics and talk about moon all the time.
Point taken, apologies. After months of Troll War I tend to shoot on sight without looking at the situation.
He has to worry more about political stuff. He is in Moscow supposedly. If someone starts posting anti-Putin diatribes, gay stuff, pro-Ukraine stuff etc. he might get a midnight visit from some new friends who don't want to understand about P2P networks, etc.
The guy really really needs a kill switch for bad content.
Cloak (before their shitstorm) were going to have a jury type system where the adds would go to 10 or so random volunteer nodes for approval. If a node disproved of the add but the majority approved of the add then the add would get uploaded. And anyone who disproved would be charged a small fee. All people who approved the add would be paid a small fee for their effort. Now if the majority disproved of the add then only those who disproved would be paid the fee and those that approved a unpopular add would pay the fee.
This way the community can decide what adds are shown. So for example we we could be ok with people selling pot but not bombs.
What you suggested is a modetarion algorithm, to make joury decide wjat is appropriate and what is not. I btw believe that something may be appropriate in Russia and not Appropriate in US (and vice versa), so this wont work.
WHat I was talking about was seller rating system to prevent fraud sells/buys.
Problem is, that when A sells things to B, B must tell everyone that A is a good/bad seller somehow. So when C decided to buy from A will make decision based on B's oppinion.
Also someone could sell to themselves a few times and build a false trust rating.
September 21, 2014, 02:50:47 AM
MineralsPR
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
Tally Ho! I see signs of the first troll of the season!
Check my post history, I am no fudder.
Its a genuine question that I would like to understand how this situation will be handled.
Dont you think questions should be asked? Or should we all just post rocket pics and talk about moon all the time.
Point taken, apologies. After months of Troll War I tend to shoot on sight without looking at the situation.
He has to worry more about political stuff. He is in Moscow supposedly. If someone starts posting anti-Putin diatribes, gay stuff, pro-Ukraine stuff etc. he might get a midnight visit from some new friends who don't want to understand about P2P networks, etc.
The guy really really needs a kill switch for bad content.
Cloak (before their shitstorm) were going to have a jury type system where the adds would go to 10 or so random volunteer nodes for approval. If a node disproved of the add but the majority approved of the add then the add would get uploaded. And anyone who disproved would be charged a small fee. All people who approved the add would be paid a small fee for their effort. Now if the majority disproved of the add then only those who disproved would be paid the fee and those that approved a unpopular add would pay the fee.
This way the community can decide what adds are shown. So for example we we could be ok with people selling pot but not bombs.
What you suggested is a modetarion algorithm, to make joury decide wjat is appropriate and what is not. I btw believe that something may be appropriate in Russia and not Appropriate in US (and vice versa), so this wont work.
WHat I was talking about was seller rating system to prevent fraud sells/buys.
Problem is, that when A sells things to B, B must tell everyone that A is a good/bad seller somehow. So when C decided to buy from A will make decision based on B's oppinion.
September 21, 2014, 02:04:58 AM
Quote
Really? Who is getting all of that BTC you are raising?
What do you mean you are not selling anything? I thought that there was a cost per advertisement. Who is getting that? And, you may not be "selling" anything, but Bittrex is accepting money in exchange for coins. You better tell them to cease and desist if that is against your wishes.
Buddy, "For" coin is not "Ford" coin, but it has nothing to to do with anything. If you think that you can do an ICO called "Amazon" coin and sell books on the blockchain with no objection, you are truly delusional.
But, let's say you are right, and Craigslist should have no objection (by your logic) and would lose any lawsuits in court. It doesn't matter for your investors. In the real world, as soon as Craigslist gets wind of this, they will try to shut it down, if for no other reason than to protect their reputation. They have deep pockets and can keep going forever and ever. How is this good for investors? And that's if you're right! -- Which you aren't.
What do you mean you are not selling anything? I thought that there was a cost per advertisement. Who is getting that? And, you may not be "selling" anything, but Bittrex is accepting money in exchange for coins. You better tell them to cease and desist if that is against your wishes.
Buddy, "For" coin is not "Ford" coin, but it has nothing to to do with anything. If you think that you can do an ICO called "Amazon" coin and sell books on the blockchain with no objection, you are truly delusional.
But, let's say you are right, and Craigslist should have no objection (by your logic) and would lose any lawsuits in court. It doesn't matter for your investors. In the real world, as soon as Craigslist gets wind of this, they will try to shut it down, if for no other reason than to protect their reputation. They have deep pockets and can keep going forever and ever. How is this good for investors? And that's if you're right! -- Which you aren't.
I'm tired. How can I argue with someone who have no idea of the definition of word sell?
Code:
Sell, verb
"give or hand over (something) in exchange for money."
I'm not getting any money. I'm getting BTC's invested into developement effort."give or hand over (something) in exchange for money."
Quote
Buddy, "For" coin is not "Ford" coin, but it has nothing to to do with anything. If you think that you can do an ICO called "Amazon" coin and sell books on the blockchain with no objection, you are truly delusional.
For the last time my coin called CraigsCoin, not CraigsListCoin - notice the difference its same as AmaCoin to AmazonCoin. If you tell me that it is same than who is delusional really?!Quote
They have deep pockets and can keep going forever and ever. How is this good for investors? And that's if you're right!
This! This is the problem. You scared of deep pockets. You just live in a delusion that deep pockets can buy anything. That is the problem, not the name. Please stop posting any more arguments on that account unles you are posting quotes from laws. I need to work on the coin and instead I'm sitting here listening this broken record. You stated that you are not interested in your first post - I got your message. Hey, me and my associates are on your side. We want to get rich. Someone tried to make a coin using Kayne West's image. He's a mid-level rap (turbopop) American singer. His lawyers attacked the coin. They could not shut it down but the made sure no merchant, exchange, mining pool, etc. would touch the coin effectively killing it. Litecoindark is having the same problems with LiteCoin. The best bet for you is to just change the name.
September 21, 2014, 01:33:49 AM
Implementing that would be a nightmare ...
why do you presume this ? 
September 21, 2014, 12:44:35 AM
NOTHING should be censored. If you believe in financial freedom and privacy, then freedom of speech should be unlimited as well.
September 21, 2014, 12:34:28 AM
The moment we try to take the "trust" out of trustless you ruin the very reason for all of this in the first place, don't forget we are trying to leave behind a failed centralized system.
Jump to: