Staby this the answer regarding your suggestions from our lead dev Artem:
artem
10:18 AM
@crowncoin_knight we'll add the version number to the wallet zip files.
About the second part - payments from the governance system to proposals which were voted yes, if you remember, we discussed this in Essen. I included that task in my project map/product backlog. The idea was to pay a part in advance which can be any percent from the whole amount, and the second part should be escrowed until they deliver (it can be paid with the next superblock but the funds need to be kept somewhere because people has already voted for it, so the tech. details need to be researched). But the important part is that @vshamray can't work on it now, he has other task, so we have to postpone it until he is free to do it or we have another dev. We also have another higher priority governance task which is systemnode voting. So I don't even know when we'll have resource to implement the payment dividing.
Thanks for update
but they should stop voting till the system is fix and what is the escrow time for said coins as promo work and such is long term, i think it more about the amount that given esp when u can outsource the same work for a 10th of the price..
"governance system to proposals which were voted yes" So if they control the most mn they control the votes and can be abused..Pity the long term holders that never voted for bad proposals are the 1s hurt the most.
promo work should only be paid once work is done and a certain length of time before they get all will be dumped like before and no REAL promo work done.
payments should be in line with there countrys $ not each different country gets same amount otherwise your paying some one 5 years of work with 1 payout and some country will never trade or use crown or have high vol of holder in those countrys.
Australian and Indian promo should never have been paid 1c of crowncoin.
thanks again for update
Da ja
Stabycroc ;_)>
bravo great work! 
