it appears that you still don't understand how cryptocurrencies work
Sorry, but your mental model of Bitcoin/Dash/etc. in term of address credits and debits as the fundamental basis of integrity is just flat out wrong.
LoL ! You sure don't read over your posts before you send them do you.
I do. I read yours too, enough to recognize that you are completely ignorant (likely willfully) about how cryptocurrencies actually operate.
Whether that's true or not is beside the point since 99% of the population are likeways and it's them who need to be convinced, not me.
What is a problem is cryptocurrency promoters who are wilfully ignorant of how monetary systems operate and you appear to be in that category.
The
issues I've cited with opaque blockchains have nothing to do with the their mechanics and everything to do with their auditability by people "with no idea how cryptocurrencies operate" which is why I suggested you revise your sales pitch. Not being able to inspect the balance movements at each end of a transaction is a non-starter for a public, unbacked medium as far as ever getting near the mainstream goes, end of. You won't find much debate over that 'out there'.
Unfortunately (well unfortunately for your fallacious argument) no one
1 including Bitcoin (nor Dash, if I'm assuming correctly, and I think i am, that Dash tranasctions work the same way as Bitcoin transactions), has created a cryptocurrency that works the way you suggest.
So your argument that A is better than B because A has some property
that it doesn't actually have is clearly false.
Maybe that means that 99% of the population will never support cryptocurrencies, I don't know. That would be consistent with available evidence.
1 Exception being a few relatively obscure cryptocurrencies such as XCN that actually work on the basis of native balances the integrity of which is maintained by the system. Ethereum does too, although the conditions on movement are arbitrarily complex, thus can't be audited beyond programatic validity anyway.
