Dash 
That's because there was no vote. Just more lies from your full-time defender tantestefana2
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1582. (Read 9723858 times)
November 20, 2015, 11:50:52 AM
That's because there was no vote. Just more lies from your full-time defender tantestefana2
November 20, 2015, 11:43:24 AM
You sound increasingly desperate, I understand why.
Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word desperate?
Desperation is lying about a fictional vote to weasel your way out of answering for a fraudulent reduction in coin emission. Desperation is attacking someone's character when you're unable to answer legitimate questions.
Maybe you can point me to the vote tantestefana2 is talking about volyova? 95% of the community voted, but no one knows where it is.
Dash
November 20, 2015, 11:36:02 AM
You sound increasingly desperate, I understand why.
Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word desperate?
Desperation is lying about a fictional vote to weasel your way out of answering for a fraudulent reduction in coin emission. Desperation is attacking someone's character when you're unable to answer legitimate questions.
Maybe you can point me to the vote tantestefana2 is talking about volyova? 95% of the community voted, but no one knows where it is.
Dash
November 20, 2015, 11:23:52 AM
Fine, I grant you it's not CERTAIN that Evan got a shitton of coins. It's still LIKELY given the circumstances.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
This was something that was voted on. I didn't like the idea myself, and argued against it. But the community was over 95% for it, so it was done. Another instance of Evan coming to the community for guidance. And there initially was no limit technically to the number of coins to be produced. The way the number of coins was limited was by reducing the emissions by 7% per year. Otherwise we kept the same setup. This calculates over the next 100 or so years as halving.
Also, Evan's initial estimates on how many coins would be produced assumed a lower hash rate (that it would never get so high as to hug the minimum reward).
And toknormal becomes silent once again.
That might be because I happen to have a life outside of this thread - weird though it may may seem - and w.t.f. happened near on 2 years ago isn't exactly the top of my priority list since I bought my coins in markets, and even if it was, it isn't my job to do your research for you.
As it happens I have some recollection of Evan asking the community if they wanted him to relaunch the coin and them going absolutely apeshit and then him apologising for suggesting it.
If I had been around at the time, I'd have gone apeshit as well. There is no Dash or Dash equivalent without its early launch issues.
As I said to someone the other day. A coin with a dodgy launch survived and became successful - for some good reasons.
Live with it.
All of this is besides the point. tantestafana2 said there was a vote and that 95% of the community voted for the huge reduction in coin emission. When i asked where this vote was, not only did you not provide the information, but you attacked me and tried to change the subject.
Thanks for confirming tantestafana2 is another one of your paid or bagholding defenders who sits around this thread all day spouting constant lies.
Dash
November 20, 2015, 11:10:14 AM
Fine, I grant you it's not CERTAIN that Evan got a shitton of coins. It's still LIKELY given the circumstances.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
This was something that was voted on. I didn't like the idea myself, and argued against it. But the community was over 95% for it, so it was done. Another instance of Evan coming to the community for guidance. And there initially was no limit technically to the number of coins to be produced. The way the number of coins was limited was by reducing the emissions by 7% per year. Otherwise we kept the same setup. This calculates over the next 100 or so years as halving.
Also, Evan's initial estimates on how many coins would be produced assumed a lower hash rate (that it would never get so high as to hug the minimum reward).
And toknormal becomes silent once again.
That might be because I happen to have a life outside of this thread - weird though it may may seem - and w.t.f. happened near on 2 years ago isn't exactly the top of my priority list since I bought my coins in markets, and even if it was, it isn't my job to do your research for you.
As it happens I have some recollection of Evan asking the community if they wanted him to relaunch the coin and them going absolutely apeshit and then him apologising for suggesting it.
If I had been around at the time, I'd have gone apeshit as well. There is no Dash or Dash equivalent without its early launch issues.
As I said to someone the other day. A coin with a dodgy launch survived and became successful - for some good reasons.
Live with it.
All of this is besides the point. tantestafana2 said there was a vote and that 95% of the community voted for the huge reduction in coin emission. When i asked where this vote was, not only did you not provide the information, but you attacked me and tried to change the subject.
Thanks for confirming tantestafana2 is another one of your paid or bagholding defenders who sits around this thread all day spouting constant lies.
Dash
November 20, 2015, 10:57:49 AM
And toknormal becomes silent once again.
That might be because I happen to have a life outside of this thread - weird though it may may seem - and w.t.f. happened near on 2 years ago isn't exactly the top of my priority list since I bought my coins in markets, and even if it was, it isn't my job to do your research for you.
As it happens I have some recollection of Evan asking the community if they wanted him to relaunch the coin and them going absolutely apeshit and then him apologising for suggesting it.
If I had been around at the time, I'd have gone apeshit as well. There is no Dash or Dash equivalent without its early launch issues.
As I said to someone the other day. A coin with a dodgy launch survived and became successful - for some good reasons.
Live with it.
November 20, 2015, 10:47:39 AM
Is there a problem with cryptsy withdrawls ?
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
Yes there on cryptsy is problems with withdravals to all people, I m happy -couple weeks ago go out of there...
Anybody had a successfull withdraw over the last days ?
OMG, after a short research i found the otohs reddit, missing 76 BTC
Did he finally got them back ? Fingers crossed !
November 20, 2015, 10:41:53 AM
No I haven't, it is you who is lying or you wrote too fast after barely reading the announcement. That time you post as proof is the time when I posted it to the forum. And it was also in the web post done a few hours ago by Phillip, which I used as a base for the announcement:
https://www.dashpay.io/news/iphone-dashwallet-release/
https://www.dashpay.io/news/iphone-dashwallet-release/
You are correct, it is at the press release. Clearly an error from my side. apologies.
No problem
November 20, 2015, 10:37:09 AM
More lies. Show us where this was voted on liar.
I think you'd better read this too before the fuse blows on your bank of asperions and insults.
Okay. and what does this have to do with anything? TanteStefana claimed there was a vote. Are you unable to understand simple questions?
Fine, I grant you it's not CERTAIN that Evan got a shitton of coins. It's still LIKELY given the circumstances.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
This was something that was voted on. I didn't like the idea myself, and argued against it. But the community was over 95% for it, so it was done. Another instance of Evan coming to the community for guidance. And there initially was no limit technically to the number of coins to be produced. The way the number of coins was limited was by reducing the emissions by 7% per year. Otherwise we kept the same setup. This calculates over the next 100 or so years as halving.
Also, Evan's initial estimates on how many coins would be produced assumed a lower hash rate (that it would never get so high as to hug the minimum reward).
So where is the vote? Where is TanteStefana2 getting 95% from?
And toknormal becomes silent once again. Keep lying, please. I'm sure you and tantestefana2 will be giving us plenty of fresh material for the new Darkcoin Lies thread in the altcoin section.
Dash
November 20, 2015, 10:36:07 AM
I'd like to say that I'm absolutely thrilled to see the trolling here. Do you know why? It's because of what the trolls can't (truthfully) say:
1) They can't say that Dash's transactions are slow. We have InstantX.
2) They can't say that Dash isn't private. The "Darksend is just Coinjoin" argument died last year.
3) They can't say that Dash's development is stalled.
4) They can't say that Dash is centralized (the reference node has been removed).
5) They can't say that Dash has to rely on donations and altruism to grow, because we have decentralized funding built into the protocol
6) They can't say that we have a governance problem, because we have decentralized governance where the entire community votes on what projects to fund
7) They can't say that our blockchain is bloated
They can't say that we don't have enough full nodes or that our node count is shrinking
All they can say is "there was an instamine." True, there was. And you can spend the next ten years arguing over whether or not it was intentional. In the meantime, we'll continue to NOT be any of those eight things above, and probably will NOT be a lot more stuff in the future.
P.S. Someone asked a few pages ago whether Darksend or ring signatures were better. Consider that Darksend is based on mixing (obfuscating) the inputs of your final transaction. Eight rounds of mixing is pretty damn secure. Consider also that ring signatures may be cryptographically secure (although the NSA connection makes me wonder), but that any cryptography, no matter how advanced, is always prone to being unmasked in the future. If ring signatures ever are broken, for instance by a new breakthrough in mathematics, then ever transaction ever made on the Monero blockchain is completely deanonymized and visible to everyone.
1) They can't say that Dash's transactions are slow. We have InstantX.
2) They can't say that Dash isn't private. The "Darksend is just Coinjoin" argument died last year.
3) They can't say that Dash's development is stalled.
4) They can't say that Dash is centralized (the reference node has been removed).
5) They can't say that Dash has to rely on donations and altruism to grow, because we have decentralized funding built into the protocol
6) They can't say that we have a governance problem, because we have decentralized governance where the entire community votes on what projects to fund
7) They can't say that our blockchain is bloated
They can't say that we don't have enough full nodes or that our node count is shrinkingAll they can say is "there was an instamine." True, there was. And you can spend the next ten years arguing over whether or not it was intentional. In the meantime, we'll continue to NOT be any of those eight things above, and probably will NOT be a lot more stuff in the future.
P.S. Someone asked a few pages ago whether Darksend or ring signatures were better. Consider that Darksend is based on mixing (obfuscating) the inputs of your final transaction. Eight rounds of mixing is pretty damn secure. Consider also that ring signatures may be cryptographically secure (although the NSA connection makes me wonder), but that any cryptography, no matter how advanced, is always prone to being unmasked in the future. If ring signatures ever are broken, for instance by a new breakthrough in mathematics, then ever transaction ever made on the Monero blockchain is completely deanonymized and visible to everyone.
November 20, 2015, 10:29:12 AM
I need help with masternodes and other features, if possible.
Check the PM Hello splawik21! I send pm about masternode! Check email.
November 20, 2015, 10:26:22 AM
Thats a port of the breadwallet: https://github.com/voisine/breadwallet
You should be more clear about this.
"The Dash team is pleased to announce the release of an iPhone wallet for Dash based on the popular Breadwallet for Bitcoin"
... Not sure how much clearer you want us to make it...
Walter
It wasn´t there, so stop lying, it has been edited by fernando (fernando, Today at 3:55 AM ). You thought no one will notice it, but i did, because i used breadwallet before.
No I haven't, it is you who is lying or you wrote too fast after barely reading the announcement. That time you post as proof is the time when I posted it to the forum. And it was also in the web post done a few hours ago by Phillip, which I used as a base for the announcement:
https://www.dashpay.io/news/iphone-dashwallet-release/
Anyway, I don't know why I bother to answer, you already have created a full conspiracy in your head
Edit: I introduced a 'who' ('it is you who is lying' instead of 'it is you is lying')
I'm the one who wrote the press release, and I'd be glad to send you the time-stamped copy of the original Word document if that would help. The phrase: "The Dash team is pleased to announce the release of an iPhone wallet for Dash based on the popular Breadwallet for Bitcoin" has been in the document since I created it. I then posted it on Slack, and the team sent it out. No conspiracy here folks.
November 20, 2015, 10:25:00 AM
Five thousand pages and there is always somebody who compare cryptonote coin with Dash and think that the latter is only about privacy.
November 20, 2015, 09:46:30 AM
Well, I guess Monero is doomed then...shame about that.
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
Quote
Moneta features the world’s first software implementation of Zerocoin, allowing it to completely solve Bitcoin’s privacy problems via zero-knowledge proofs.
Source code?
Quote
Moneta will implement a new data structure allowing for block confirmation times as fast as 1 second (~600 times faster than Bitcoin) without a security trade-off.
We will see
Quote
Moneta will feature an ASIC-resistant mining algorithm with fine-tuneable memory and processing cost parameters, and a democratic voting system for protocol governance.
Oh protocol governance, interesting... we will see
November 20, 2015, 09:36:11 AM
Is there a problem with cryptsy withdrawls ?
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
Yes there on cryptsy is problems with withdravals to all people, I m happy -couple weeks ago go out of there...
Anybody had a successfull withdraw over the last days ?
probably is not posible to withdraw BTC ,but some coins like dash, ltc, doge, pays fast, usually within minutes for small amounts +- 25 DASH etc.
November 20, 2015, 09:33:09 AM
Well, I guess Monero is doomed then...shame about that.
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
lol yeah totally
Quote
Re: I'm Gary Le, co-founder of Moneta, the world's first implementation of Zerocoin. AMA
Post reputation: 0
Quote
Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:57 pm
@Gary, It has been over 5 days and you have not answered questions relating directly to your own project.
So much for being transparent and people taking you seriously.
You show up for an ASK ME ANYTHING, answer some questions then run away...
Great show of trust when asking others to trust you and your team with a ZEROCOIN implementation.
Post reputation: 0
Quote
Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:57 pm
@Gary, It has been over 5 days and you have not answered questions relating directly to your own project.
So much for being transparent and people taking you seriously.
You show up for an ASK ME ANYTHING, answer some questions then run away...
Great show of trust when asking others to trust you and your team with a ZEROCOIN implementation.
funny enough that it would kill XMR but not DASH, but yeah i agree, dash has nothing todo with privacy anymore.
November 20, 2015, 09:30:11 AM
Well, I guess Monero is doomed then...shame about that.
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-m-gary-le-co-founder-of-moneta-the-world-s-first-implementation-of-zerocoin-ama-t2408.html
November 20, 2015, 09:12:18 AM
Is there a problem with cryptsy withdrawls ?
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
I was wonder why there is a low volume for Dash and logged in to withdraw my last 0.9 BTC i had there - Nothing happens since hours, Status = pending
To long away, am i finally MTGoxed ?
EDIT: Just saw this -> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/10/19/bitcoin-exchange-cryptsy-may-have-gone-full-mt-gox-refuses-to-pay-out-customers/
Yes there on cryptsy is problems with withdravals to all people, I m happy -couple weeks ago go out of there...
Anybody had a successfull withdraw over the last days ?
November 20, 2015, 08:52:45 AM
More lies. Show us where this was voted on liar.
I think you'd better read this too before the fuse blows on your bank of asperions and insults.
Okay. and what does this have to do with anything? TanteStefana claimed there was a vote. Are you unable to understand simple questions?
Fine, I grant you it's not CERTAIN that Evan got a shitton of coins. It's still LIKELY given the circumstances.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
What really made me WTF in your post is the "changing mind" thing about the emission schedule. That should not be changed lightly, if at all - you should know this.
This was something that was voted on. I didn't like the idea myself, and argued against it. But the community was over 95% for it, so it was done. Another instance of Evan coming to the community for guidance. And there initially was no limit technically to the number of coins to be produced. The way the number of coins was limited was by reducing the emissions by 7% per year. Otherwise we kept the same setup. This calculates over the next 100 or so years as halving.
Also, Evan's initial estimates on how many coins would be produced assumed a lower hash rate (that it would never get so high as to hug the minimum reward).
So where is the vote? Where is TanteStefana2 getting 95% from?
November 20, 2015, 08:32:30 AM
More lies. Show us where this was voted on liar.
I think you'd better read this too before the fuse blows on your bank of asperions and insults.
Jump to: