Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1594. (Read 9723858 times)

LOL, you mean Dash's *100% self-imposed* SEO challenges.  Brilliant move, rebrand to from a unique name like Dark-coin to a generic one, then spend even more money trying to dig out of the hole of brand obscurity.

In a real company, Duffield's floundering, expensive antics would have gotten him fired months ago.  In terms of share price, the market has been voting for a change of senior management since the moment the rebrand went into effect.

The pivot away from privacy to yet another high-volume retail payment rail and the copycat ETH wannabee Evolusham nonsense reek of desperation, and are obviously a hail-mary play designed to squeeze a few more dumps worth of insta-mined profit out of bag-holders before the entire house of cards collapses.

bump

Raptor_73





and once again, i am not Adam White. i can prove it, but let's see how long it takes you dummies to figure out.

Trolls love dash hence why they are here..

Only 53 BTC of buy support on Poloniex.  

3500 masternodes, but only 60 can cash out at any price. That's not nearly enough to compete with Bitcoin.

53 BTC x $337 = $17,861. Not even enough buy support to pay for Dash.org

DASH  

 I just absolutely find it endearing how troll don't understand how this constant badgering does nothing but promote us.

 Intelligence of a doorbell, zero knowledge of how Dash actually works, just a bunch of ding-dongs...

Thats because we don't buy your "black is white", "decentralised is third party", "capital deployment is locked coins", "asking questions is not trolling" B.S. and you've no option but to start throwing your toys out the pram.

The fact is this thread is unmoderated so your cult analogies are toast.

Moreover you've been more indulged here than you would have been in an Ikea kids nursery so if it still isn't enough for you, p*ss off, stick your thumb in your mouth and grab hold of that "instamine" blanket for comfort instead  

By your warped understanding of "trust", smoothie, every crypto has compromised privacy because "other people" run every node, miner and wallet on the entire network. Furthermore the least trustable and most compromised of all cryptocurrency blockchains in that respect are cryptonote ones which are a breeding ground for corruption being that they provide no way to publicly verify by inspection the integrity of its financial mechanics en masse.


Hey - I'm not trolling either. I'm just observing that everything you post is unmitigated b.s., for example confusing obscurity with fungibility, decentralisation with "trust", privacy with value and capital deployment with capital sequestration, all on the same page. Not bad going for someone who's parading themselves as an ethics crusader interested in privacy. Ever heard of "irony" ?

You want to make the bold claim that the deployment of masternodes amounts to "trusting other people with your privacy" ?

Be my guest and become that "third party". They are decentralised so you are free to show us how it's done. Don't worry, I won't be holding my breath because as everyone is aware it's yet another one of your b.s. pieces of fud along with the other three I cited above.

Alternatively you could just try to solve this puzzle which you might find a bit easier:

I added two numbers together to get 8. Which two were they ?  

FYI

https://github.com/dashpay/dash/wiki/Whitepaper#24-roles-and-proof-of-service

This is what happens when you use a shady exchange like cryptsy.

Never cared for them even from 2 years ago.

Good luck getting your funds out.

Yup of course to you asking any questions is "trolling".

Typical.

The part I dislike about dash the most aside from the obvious glaring issues that have been discuss at length is that by using masternodes for your "privacy" you are essentially trusting other people with your privacy.

Not a good thing no matter how many masternodes you have.

As far as "LESS VOLATILITY" as an accomplishment........ I would say that on that front DASH has failed.

The price movements are no better than most other coins out there including bitcoin.

But of course trollees like yourself, will spin stuff any which way much like has been done in the past.

 

Now they are just cancelling my attempted withdrawals that had been pending for 3 & 4 days ago rather than processing them, 6 BTC & 755 Dash, I didn't ask them to and they don't let me know about it, unbelievable.

Actually, it's the other way around.

Most people only invest in financial assets when liquidity (that means price) has reached a certain (massive) level.

No one wanted bitcoins when they were cheap. Everyone wanted them when they were expensive.

What is the point of essentially "locking up" the coins in your wallet when it could be providing a service to the network and earning you a return ?

Hell - either put them to work or put them on an exchange orderbook but let them 'breathe' man

I found this interview interesting.  It features the hidden half of the Daily Decrypt, Pete Eyre, on the Anarchast.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0YNNsQSGcg

the coins are not locked up and can be sold at anytime just as easy as a normal wallet transaction.



more masternodes, less volatility.



multiple people can share a node through trusted services and when the price goes up this will happen more and more.



yeah it's called capitalism. large mining farms get more coins than smaller ones, pretty cool huh.



you were trolling with those questions but that's cool because we love the bumps. it was getting slow here so i took you off ignore to reply and bump the thread.
please respond with more concern trolling so we can keep this thread bumped.

It means there is more active investment and support than if the count was lower. It means the system can scale to higher tx/s when the Evolution is deployed. It means the system is safer and more secure than if the count was lower.



Usually people should buy when the price is low, but I don't give financial advice so scratch that. Instead I'll mention that if the price gets high and the network needs even more scaling, the requirement could be dropped to 500 in order to get more nodes online to achieve higher tx/s capacity.



Yes, otherwise someone could launch million nodes for free making it impossible to keep paying a % of the block reward to the masternodes. And if the masternodes won't get paid, there would probably be 20 full nodes in the world. You can see this being the case with every existing coin.

People can also pool their monies together to run a node, and that is already being done.



Please show me an investment / speculative asset where the rich don't get richer but the poor instead and I'll buy that.

Rich get richer?

Hmm, is this a new concept, created by Dash?
Weird never saw this elsewhere...

You are not a troll? Maybe, so you are just stupid.
 

early adopter get rewarded, just like what happend to bitcoin holder who bought at early days...

What is the point of essentially locking up the dash supply in masternodes?

Side effect is price stays higher than if all coins were not locked up by masternodes system.


Higher masternode count means what?

If price of dash goes up then you create a bigger barrier to entry for new people.

Currently there is a barrier to entry to participate with 1000 dash per masternode.

Essentially a large holder of dash gets more masternodes in the long run with more payments than other smaller owners.

Is this a case of the rich get richer?

All honest questions.

If my asking questions is trolling then perhaps another word needs to be used for actual trolling.