Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1823. (Read 9724017 times)

Successful people ignore trolls!

I assume there is some banter going on with this smoothie character, but since I am practicing being successful....

FWIW: Evan posted that pic himself yesterday, saying it was his wife.

Be smart my friend, don't reject the evolution and don't touch the little girl

Oh now with the insults. =)

Was waiting for that to start...yes I guess I am.

Look at the class this community has to start insulting other users. 

That picture was originally in the main post of this thread as far as I am aware. And just because someone looks 14 doesn't mean they are.

So you're an old donkey ;-)
Be smart my friend, don't reject the evolution and don't touch the little girl

Someone who puts a picture of what looks like a 14 years old girls....good record indeed. Monero hater!

Yeah I am so jealous being that I have had a spotless track record being on this forum for over 4 years..yup  

Poor little troll jealous of Dash.
My advice, sell Physical Dash on your shop ;-)
And this is just the beginning
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GACaNvBlwc&t=1m27s

Litecoin, seriously
Who would like a physical Litecoin ?

I noticed you did not directly address the instamine claim. 

where o where am i advertising monero??

The facts from your post already are public, as is the speculation. They probably make up about 1/4 of this entire thread (perhaps a slight exaggeration).

One key difference between eduffield (Evan Duffield) is that is a real, identifiable person, who appears in videos, conferences, on podcasts etc., whereas someone like CoinHunter/RealSolid hides behind a pseudonym, as do many of the other actual scammers in the cryptocurrency scene.

A key difference between Dash and a typical shit coin is that the Dash developers constantly deliver on their proposals, not 100% of the time, but not too far off. No doubt some ideas which have been proposed in the past have been discarded, but the majority of the most important ones have been delivered. One which you mention is masternode blinding, however, (for the first time) the language used in talking about the next release would have most that follow this Dash thread believing that it will in fact be delivered in the next release, and perhaps a genuine reason to be disappointed if it is not. Of course it all depends if it can be implemented in a way that doesn't compromise the security of the network and the currency. I'm sure we'll see it on testnet at least.

Step 6.
I think it's worth pointing out that step 6 in your post is ridiculous. Whether one likes the name "Superblocks" or not has nothing to do with their function. The claim that 1 person owns over 50% of all masternodes is laughable. Of course it is impossible to establish who owns exactly what percentage of masternodes (unless perhaps all masternode owners - stakeholders in this anonymous cryptocurrency - choose to make that information public and verifiable, which I doubt will happen. 50% is a significantly higher proportion than anything I've seen linked to one entity. And really, it's almost irrelevant anyway. Dash is available to buy on the markets for anyone who is interested and has the money. They can set up their own masternodes/s and reduce the proportion owned by this imaginary 50% behemoth. If they can't afford a full node they can pool their funds with others and use of the many dedicated masternode hosts which are popping up. The fact that part of the block reward is taken away from the miners, is one approach. It may not be the approach a developer who is also an important miner would take, but it appears to be valid one nonetheless, providing for incentivised full nodes and funding of proposals approved by the decentralised voting mechanism.

Smoothie is no troll he's just a Monero hater, it amazes me how they try hard advertising their coin everywhere by attacking other coins with no credibility. Just today I saw how Smooth attacking Vanillacoin developer while he nor the other 29 Monero developers did shit.

Cry*p*to into forums Monero haters are just everywhere!!

 

Depends on what you define "successful" as.

Obviously our definitions are different.

Success is not when you mislead people into thinking you are honest when really you are not. Instamining DRK early on for any reason and then claiming it was a fair launch is dishonest at best.

Successful people live in the now, they do not dwell on past mistakes, and move on quickly.
successful people build and create new ideas and think big.
Successful people are not petty, and do not find it necessary to put others down in order to bolster their ego.

Failed people focus on other people's character traits/weaknesses and try to bring them down, and think in a small narrow minded way, focusing on how they look and not what they do or make.
Failed people do not get on with their work, they prefer to meddle in other's creativity as they lack their own.
Failed people put new ideas down, as it challenges their often (small) intellect and ego because they didn't think of it first.

I doubt there was much as far as coins to dump.  I ran a pool for a while, and maybe made a total of $30 for 6 months.  Even middlecoin and wafflepool closed and they ran with huge hashrates.

That is a new low, please show some class while trolling. ^^

Oh my, ignored troll is trying to communicate with me. Ignored troll not very bright...
I guess i will have to keep praying for smarter trolls to return to us and truly entertain us.

 

Eheheh this guys will never quit...

Very entertaining