And how did this 'decentralized' voting mechanism get a higher priority than masternode blinding?
That's concerning for a couple reasons. The first being the horrendous and suspicious launch circumstances of the coin and the resulting awful coin distribution, limiting the privacy capabilities of the coin, but also that these large holders basically can change the path of the coin if just two or three of them decide to make a change using the voting system under the pretense of 'community consensus'. Also concerning is that the first couple initiatives passed are to put even more coins in the hands of the few, and then to create the OTC system allowing them to unload them without (hopefully) wrecking their sell price.
I happily donated 30 drk (around $90 usd at the time) towards the video initiative before the unilateral name change nonsense, when the coin was still privacy centric. But then the tiny group of decision makers decided to change the name and purpose of the coin shortly afterwards, as well as decide to completely change the goal of what the video was to accomplish. Anyways, I'd be curious to see where my money went to, even if I don't believe in this project anymore.
Has vid been completed?
Good questions! The answer to all of them is 'Forget about it, DASH is obviously a scam.'
Superblocks...LOL...
here was my donation....
They take care of the script, voice, animation, everything, but we approve each stage before they move to the next stage. I just set an appointment with them for Monday, will get a quote and then see if there are others willing to contribute towards this. Please check the site so you get an idea of their work.
I'll put atleast 30 drk towards it, if it looks like we are coming short I'll dig deeper.
on blockchain...
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/tx.dws?1564987.htm