I think it is a bit unfair the way that you are using rhetoric to support your cause. Since most of us had to discover what the world was really like by our self, most of us where not born into an enlightened environment. Therefore the paradigm shift towards this type of counter culture can happen later in life. Most of us did not see the dystopia coming, and at some point believed in the illusion of mainstream society since most of us where not born into this alternative understanding. Unless you had very special parents, which is how the cycle can be broken.
I am a supporter of DASH since I think if it did become more widely adopted it would make the world a much better place. Since most cryptocurrencies are profoundly better then fiat currencies and the centralized banking systems that most people use today. I do appreciate you bringing these issues to our attention, since I embrace criticism, so I thank you for that. I just do not think you always go about it in the right way. I have looked up and researched the issues you have mentioned, and I do believe that these points of centralization are just temporary solutions that will be decentralized in the future as is claimed by the developers of DASH.
You are actually making Monero look bad which is not fair on Monero either since you are just an individual speaking out freely and you do not necessarily represent the spirit of the Monero community. I actually hold several anon coins including Monero which I personally think is a great project, I also do love reading George Orwell. We should all just be able to get along, instead of fighting each other we should focus on the bigger picture and bring the cryptocurrency revolution to the rest of the world.
Thank you for a sincere response to a sincere post.
How do you feel about the immediate characterization of my post as "trolling?"
Isn't that a completely typical DashHole cultist reaction to well-founded critiques and pertinent observations?
As for the "temporary points of centralization" please understand that such expedient measures have a way of becoming ingrained, and the technical obstacles to removing them would require innovation on the order of Satoshi Consensus (a rare, once in an epoch, great step for Mankind comparable to the moon landing).
I'd like to believe Duffman is another Satoshi, but let's keep it real here. He isn't. And thus your supremely lofty expectations of his abilities are not reasonable.
For example, one does not simply "decentralize the Reference Node." Let's admit those who claim the Reference Node, hardcoded collateral address, and Spork remote killswitch may be disposed of with normative efforts are being intentionally dishonest when they portray these 'shortcuts' as conceivably (much less trivially) replaceable in a manner compatible with the diffuse/distributed/resilient and thus antifragile ethos of Bitcoin.
Please understand why your pleas for ecumenical solidarity with Monero are being and will always be rejected on face.
We are fans of XMR precisely because it features qualities lacking (or even rejected) by Dash.
You know the score, and can see why we won't ever find common cause with a coin which was initially closed source (an unforgivable sin) and stealth/ambush-launched/mined previous to the announced release schedule (another blasphemy against Lord Nakamoto).
The closed source, the shady release and resulting sketchy instamine, the unapologetic (supposed) community embrace of that history, the multiple centralized features claiming to be only temporary, and the autocratic vibe of Dash development all prevent us Monero Mustangs from ever wanting DashHoles in our foxholes, and require us to speak out.