Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2293. (Read 9723858 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.



Sounds fair enough for me as well.


Crossposting from dashtalk:

Quote from: Solarminer, post: 51887, member: 3405
In my opinion, pulling a set amount from the blockchain for future spending encourages frivolous spending.  I would instead say that the blockchain amount changes only when there is a need.  For example, a proposed video to support Dash needs a 6 month take of 1%.  MNs vote and then after approved the split changes.  After 6 months the split reverts.  We could do the same for new features, wallets, etc.  I would encourage each funding proposal to expire after a set time.  Putting a permanent 'development tax' on the blockchain sounds really bad to me.

Liking this idea. If there are approved projects to fund, divert that agreed amount to fund them. If not, why stockpile money? Keep a reserve but cap it at something sensible. Don't take from miners and MN ops when it's not needed.

Contractors should be paid after they deliver to full spec, never before, we shouldn't be fronting money to anyone.

Who's in control of this pot anyway? There's someone out there with 600 MNs or something. What % of votes are needed to decide a poll?

Or, we don't have to spend it all.  There is nothing wrong with savings.  But I suspect that great projects will be submitted and there won't be enough funds around to fund them all.  I honestly don't think this will be a problem for quite some time.  And if it does become a problem, like minotaur said, unspent funds could go back to the miners.  You could do something like an end of the year deposit into yet another account which makes a % payment to found blocks, which should pay out completely in 1 year, and each year there is a surplus of funds, this is done with that account.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.


Everything is up for discussion at the moment, others are proposing a dynamic system depending on funding needs. I guess we need to work on the details, but to be honest, 480K is not even the yearly budget of a small business. It can definitely be adjusted as we grow, but I think if there is any adjustment down the reduction should go to miners not masternodes. The masternodes can't have an incentive to not fund legitimate projects to keep more rewards, the fair thing is for any savings to go to miners, if there is ever a change like this.

Good thinking.  I actually think 15% is barely enough.  and remember, the value of money (DASH) is dependent on time+skill+effort.  The more work that goes into this project, the more value the coin will have and the more usefulness the project will have. Thus everyone will benefit including the users and their needs.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
I would, but first posters don't qualify as a troll. I always give the benefit of the doubt to anyone  Tongue

 I wasn't kidding, I am a man of my word.

You want trolling!  OK:

DASH isn't the greatest invention of all time!


Now, pay up!

You forgot the magic troll words

You're a sheep in wolfs clothing  Smiley



There's no pleasing you DASHheads.  OK:

DASH isn't the greatest instamine of all time!



Ok I feel charitable...I'll donate 1 Dash right now.  send the address...
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.



Sounds fair enough for me as well.


Crossposting from dashtalk:

Quote from: Solarminer, post: 51887, member: 3405
In my opinion, pulling a set amount from the blockchain for future spending encourages frivolous spending.  I would instead say that the blockchain amount changes only when there is a need.  For example, a proposed video to support Dash needs a 6 month take of 1%.  MNs vote and then after approved the split changes.  After 6 months the split reverts.  We could do the same for new features, wallets, etc.  I would encourage each funding proposal to expire after a set time.  Putting a permanent 'development tax' on the blockchain sounds really bad to me.

Liking this idea. If there are approved projects to fund, divert that agreed amount to fund them. If not, why stockpile money? Keep a reserve but cap it at something sensible. Don't take from miners and MN ops when it's not needed.

Contractors should be paid after they deliver to full spec, never before, we shouldn't be fronting money to anyone.

Who's in control of this pot anyway? There's someone out there with 600 MNs or something. What % of votes are needed to decide a poll?
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.


Everything is up for discussion at the moment, others are proposing a dynamic system depending on funding needs. I guess we need to work on the details, but to be honest, 480K is not even the yearly budget of a small business. It can definitely be adjusted as we grow, but I think if there is any adjustment down the reduction should go to miners not masternodes. The masternodes can't have an incentive to not fund legitimate projects to keep more rewards, the fair thing is for any savings to go to miners, if there is ever a change like this.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
I would, but first posters don't qualify as a troll. I always give the benefit of the doubt to anyone  Tongue

 I wasn't kidding, I am a man of my word.

You want trolling!  OK:

DASH isn't the greatest invention of all time!


Now, pay up!

You forgot the magic troll words

You're a sheep in wolfs clothing  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.



Sounds fair enough for me as well.
legendary
Activity: 1182
Merit: 1000
I'm extremely excited at the scale of this. Some weeks ago, when the masternode donation system and funding of devs was announced, I was excited but thinking that there wouldn't be nearly enough money to actually incentive development.

But 15% of block rewards? At the current rate of exchange, $40,000 per month or $480,000 per year? That's a staggering amount of funding which can be used for development, marketing, etc. I'm thinking this is very, very good! Imagine how far half a million dollars per year will go if spent wisely!

i think 10% should be plenty for right now. when the project grows and they need more the mn's should vote on it.
40/50/10 - m/mn/dev.


legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
I was actually thinking of taking him up on it, as I'd do just about anything for a coin Wink  But, I couldn't get myself to say it  Undecided  LOL

Well coins101, I think it's now or never...   
Just put it to her. Whats the worst that can happen?

Oh, um, not unless he's over 55, thank you very much Cheesy 

Oh my, Mrs.Robinson - for a fleeting second, that was so very close



[sorry everyone, slightly off topic  Grin]

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
I was actually thinking of taking him up on it, as I'd do just about anything for a coin Wink  But, I couldn't get myself to say it  Undecided  LOL

Well coins101, I think it's now or never...  
Just put it to her. Whats the worst that can happen?

Oh, um, not unless he's over 55, thank you very much Cheesy  

So I would guess it's OK.

(Apparently he has 101, generally people put their age or year of birth in their pseudo)
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
 I would, but first posters don't qualify as a troll. I always give the benefit of the doubt to anyone  Tongue

 I wasn't kidding, I am a man of my word.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
I was actually thinking of taking him up on it, as I'd do just about anything for a coin Wink  But, I couldn't get myself to say it  Undecided  LOL

Well coins101, I think it's now or never...   
Just put it to her. Whats the worst that can happen?

Oh, um, not unless he's over 55, thank you very much Cheesy 
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
I was actually thinking of taking him up on it, as I'd do just about anything for a coin Wink  But, I couldn't get myself to say it  Undecided  LOL

Well coins101, I think it's now or never...   
Just put it to her. Whats the worst that can happen?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

 1 Dash for the first troll that shouts

 Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Address:    7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

LOL.. coin101 quit your mask!

That level of humour was far too sophisticated to have come from me.

I actually think he is a proper troll. He said DRK in one of his addy links, and not DASH.  Pay up Ghost.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

 1 Dash for the first troll that shouts

 Blockchain Governance = centralization.

LOL

Address:    7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

GhostPlayer...did you create your own new account to give yourself some of your own coins...LOL?  LOL

omg. he trolled himself  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

 1 Dash for the first troll that shouts

 Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Address:    7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

LOL.. coins101 quit your mask!
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001

 1 Dash for the first troll that shouts

 Blockchain Governance = centralization.

LOL

Address:    7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

GhostPlayer...did you create your own new account to give yourself some of your own coins...LOL?  LOL

I was actually thinking of taking him up on it, as I'd do just about anything for a coin Wink  But, I couldn't get myself to say it  Undecided  LOL
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245

 1 Dash for the first troll that shouts

 Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Blockchain Governance = centralization.

Address:    7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

GhostPlayer...did you create your own new account to give yourself some of your own coins...LOL?  LOL

Nope.

https://www.darkcoinfoundation.org/donate/

To donate please send:

DRK to: 7gnwGHt17heGpG9Crfeh4KGpYNFugPhJdh

BTC to: 381vDhb5Cy4qntwmDeGk6GPbetCMU5YDpR


 Smiley

i like the way you troll Mister !! eh, you do realise this will make you our most favourite troll now ..  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
Thanks again to splawik21 for the MN hosting services.    Finished setting 3 more up within a day of the request.

yeah!;)
Sorry for that day of request but real life is a 'bitch' sometimes... Wink
hero member
Activity: 508
Merit: 500
Can everybody stop buying damnit and sell. 120 was a very nice entry level  Lips sealed
Jump to: