Vertoe does not agree with having a strong visionary lead in a project obviously. And he feels his work was not appreciated enough.
Vertoe did not object to "a strong visionary lead in a project" nor complain "his work was not appreciated."
That's not what he said. How dare you put words in his mouth.
He objected to
1) the dishonesty of calling a blatantly centralized and Incorporated project 'decentralized'
2) acting like an "old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures"
3) exploiting volunteer devs by using stealing their Darkcoin efforts for Dash's gain
4) the "fishy, intransparent" things going on (probably a ref to the instamine and shady gambling $$$$ backing)
5) greedy cultists "trying to win a gold donkey" and "trying to exploit every possible vector of profit"
6) a bus factor of 1
CITATION:
darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity.
this currency is lead by a single person.
darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid.
fuck this i tell you.
darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing.
the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
?