So yes there is ideology behind this coin : privacy, liberty, freedom, try to make the world less directed by "power" and more with the heart...
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'.
It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money.
The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard.
no.
i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
good luck
What took you so long?
This coin is nothing but a pump and dumper since the beginning. Same people same hype. Over and over again. Many of us saw this long ago and used this coin for what it really is. A profit generator.
Darkcoin, Dashcoin, Shitcoin. Call it whatever you want. It's obvious what's going on. I bought back into this coin not because it has a future but because I knew these insiders were getting ready for another pump. I doubled my investment and am quite happy. Will I hold this shitcoin? No way. Not going to get caught holding the bag when one of the 10% that own 80% of the supply decides to get out.
Decentralized? Goldman Sachs is more decentralized than this centralized cryptocurrency controlled by one person with a majority owned by a small group. Then there is the masternode centralization where the majority of the masternodes are owned by a few people. I brought this up a long time ago but was met with chants from the brainwashed cult members of fud fud fud.
Well I have a chant of my own Truth Truth Truth!
Let it drop back to around $2 and then get back in. It's probably got another pump in it.