so you say this is wrong
"Satoshi certainly has a lot of funds. Bitcoin security consultant Sergio Lerner's oft-cited analysis puts the figure at around 1m BTC, based on the early mining that he or she did."
http://www.coindesk.com/dangerous-satoshi-nakamoto/I'm not saying its wrong although it is somewhat speculative. I reported what I know about the topic that is all. There was no rush to mine, the mining was very slow (below the target) and many people mined, but not a lot. According to the theory in that article satoshi was apparently mining just to keep the network going (at the minimum difficulty, and limping at that), so I don't think we really know for sure that he even kept the coins. Maybe, maybe not.
Lerner quantifies that behaviour, and reaches similar conclusions. He believes that Satoshi wasn't mining for profit, because of the way he or she gradually pulled out of the mining process as other miners took on a greater percentage of the hashrate
I stand by my statement that the situation was totally different back then. It is hard to imagine a situation where people would mine and not keep the wallets, but people definitely did that. Remember, no exchanges, no price, no trading, no nothing (and no guarantee of any of that ever).
Department of, please spare me the concern trolling, I'm not interested. If you don't like Monero, sell it. How much have you donated to the development fund by the way? I don't see your name on the hall of fame anywhere.