I could likewise say that all the repetitive cheerleading that goes on by self interested parties (holders) is inappropriate and ethically dubious shilling.
No you couldn't.
I can and I do call it that. So you are incorrect.
In case you hadn't noticed, this is the Darkcoin thread, not the Monero thread. The implication is that it's forum for discussion amongst those with an active interest in the project, not shills for other ones. I think that's a generally accepted ethic across bitcointalk.
I'm not shilling, and I rarely if ever even so much as mention Monero except in direct response (such as this one). The same can't be said for some others who post here and I agree with you that is inappropriate and should not happen.
As far as commenting
about DRK, not only am I a DRK holder, I was around the crypto scene long before Monero and I'll be around long after Monero if the Monero project should end. I did not surrender my credentials as an interested (meaning having an interest) member of the cryptocurrency world with a right of expression when I joined the Monero project and I won't do so now.
It's not very difficult to tell the difference between an adverse remark from a poster who's a genuine holder concerned about their investment and one from a poster who's got no financial interest whatsoever and who's only agenda is one of malignant disruption.
Being concerned about "one's investment" is not the only reason one might legitimately engage in commentary and debate. Your attitude exemplifies exactly the type of one-sided cheerleading to which I alluded. It is no more appropriate or honest then trolling.
We talk about coin holders as "the community" because they club together in forums and discuss a common interest. But they are not "the community" in the same sense that Apache web developers are the "the community" or that Linux code controbutors are "the community".
People who actively participate in the ongoing project "effort" are certainly part of the community. I would include in that, at least: participating in discussions about direction, progress and priorities; working to reach new users; creating supporting services and materials (FAQs, etc.); and actively providing support services for new users. I suppose I would agree with you that someone who never does any of that and just buys some coins on cryptsy and hopes they go up isn't.
Cryptocoins are a bit different from other investments in that they are also pieces of open source software, and holders are usually also "users" of the software (and indeed users who often directly interact with the developers), a category which is generally (I would say almost universally) considered to be part of an open source community. We certainly consider users to be part of the community in any open source project I'm involved with (more than one presently) or have been in the past (many). Again this wouldn't apply to someone who just buys on an exchange and never uses the software.