[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3118.

vertoe

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 505

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on January 29, 2015, 05:41:01 AM

This is what happens in cryptoworld https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBdhAywbgrI
Help me here guys, I am so pesimistic about crypto currencies. As much as I would want ot believe crypto will succeed, everyday i think more that it never be adopted. Volatility is a killer, my friends just laugh about it... How can the volatility be stopped? Can masternodes stop it? Orcouple of whales are needed to prevent wild fluctuation of the price?

Darkcoin is in the area of 0.006 BTC (+-0.001) for more than 6 month now.

neutraLTC

legendary

Activity: 1492

Merit: 1021

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on January 29, 2015, 05:44:30 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hey i was checking projects out, and i came across something that might Moon DRK even more Cheesy

Does this mean that if you have a SendChat you will be able to send messages to Telegram users ?

Yes! 100%

BiteMyShinyMetalAss

hero member

Activity: 617

Merit: 509

Crypto Card - https://platinum.crypto.com/r/28cz7d

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hey i was checking projects out, and i came across something that might Moon DRK even more Cheesy

Does this mean that if you have a SendChat you will be able to send messages to Telegram users ?

BiteMyShinyMetalAss

hero member

Activity: 617

Merit: 509

Crypto Card - https://platinum.crypto.com/r/28cz7d

This is what happens in cryptoworld https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBdhAywbgrI
Help me here guys, I am so pesimistic about crypto currencies. As much as I would want ot believe crypto will succeed, everyday i think more that it never be adopted. Volatility is a killer, my friends just laugh about it... How can the volatility be stopped? Can masternodes stop it? Orcouple of whales are needed to prevent wild fluctuation of the price?

fuzzyduck

member

Activity: 78

Merit: 10

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 02:45:33 AM

Darkcoin "Architecturally Flawed"...

I'm involved in a discussion over on another thread where a Monero guy is possiting that Darkcoin is "Architecturally Flawed" due to the masternode architecture.

I've already posted quite a long response and he has come back with a whole load of cryptographic waffle which I haven't got time right now to respond to.

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

His original point: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10291319

My reply:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10293523

His:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10296615

Be polite.

If the statement of gaining access to VPS by the NSI, FBI etc is true, the need for a masternode running at random locations becomes more relevant. Like running it at home on a little server or even on for example a Raspberry PI so you can plug it anywhere. I think the port 9999 needs to be UPNP (dummyproof), or like how Teamviewer does it; straight trough the router (dunno how that works though).

Rux

legendary

Activity: 1291

Merit: 1024

https://crypto.ba

yesterday i bought 475 DRK, today 528 DRK

http://prntscr.com/5ygn7t

thats it

im on 1000 DRK, tonight masternode start Grin

AnonCoinTwitter

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Anyone care to address the implications of this question? If registration of Masternodes is required, the penalties for not doing so could be significant.

Quote from: ArticMine on January 28, 2015, 05:26:33 PM

The real question in my mind in the Monero vs Darkcoin debate is:

Are Darkcoin masternodes Money Transmitters under FinCEN regulations? This is significant given that a significant number of Darkcoin masternodes are under US jurisdiction.

This is far from clear from reading the FinCEN rulings http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R001.pdf and http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R012.pdf. The situation for Monero is on the other hand clear given the existing rulings involving Bitcoin above, since there is no masternode equivalent in Monero that a regulator can regulate.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 04:03:27 AM

Quote from: crowning on January 29, 2015, 03:06:16 AM

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 02:45:33 AM

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

It's a waste of time to argue with/against other coin supporters.

I stopped that, well, about ages ago and use my time to do something useful.

ok, I'm doing it.... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10297191

You're doing a very good job

Fluffypony has been on the Spreadcoin thread with an axe to grind too.

Otoh

donator

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1167

green today, green yesterday, green this week, green all month; can't touch this :p

MasterMined710

legendary

Activity: 1182

Merit: 1000

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 02:45:33 AM

Darkcoin "Architecturally Flawed"...

I'm involved in a discussion over on another thread where a Monero guy is possiting that Darkcoin is "Architecturally Flawed" due to the masternode architecture.

I've already posted quite a long response and he has come back with a whole load of cryptographic waffle which I haven't got time right now to respond to.

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

His original point: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10291319

My reply:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10293523

His:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10296615

Be polite.

darkcoin is far from a finished product and development continues. most of the issues fluffy brings up are known and in fact already have a solution waiting to be implemented. the new masternode blinding thing evan is working on along with ip obfuscation takes care of most of the issues he drones on about.
masternodes are located all over the world and out of the nsa or any single-entities jurisdiction so the whole warrant snooping thing is ridiculous. don't you need like 90% of the mn to see 1% of the transactions, something like that.

the cryptobloat vs darkcoin debate is over and darkcoin won. darkcoin won before xmr even had a working wallet, if you thought their bloating was bad before just wait till people start to use it as intended. they have a huge inflation problem and are not future proofed with their inferior on chain mixing as pointed out by AnonyMint. their incompatibility issues have already seen them snubbed over drk when it comes to adoption and their cryptography is unproven and sure to have more (serious) bugs found in the future according to peter todd.

fluffypony can ramble on until he is blue in the face but the market has spoken and the debate is all but settled, instantX will be the final nail in the coffin.

toknormal

legendary

Activity: 3066

Merit: 1188

Quote from: crowning on January 29, 2015, 03:06:16 AM

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 02:45:33 AM

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

It's a waste of time to argue with/against other coin supporters.

I stopped that, well, about ages ago and use my time to do something useful.

ok, I'm doing it.... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10297191

brookefinancial

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Test payment with DRK Darkcoin was a success on the 3D printing webstore www.ISG3D.com! Thanks!

https://twitter.com/ISG3D/status/560714751131779072

AzzAz

legendary

Activity: 1030

Merit: 1006

Quote from: thimo on January 28, 2015, 10:50:44 PM

wish i had enough DRK for master node

you have Mangled Blue's service to get part of MN... If you're not bot...

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Its a troll thread anyway. OP changing views on coins based on one supporter's views?

crowning

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Activity: -42

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2015, 02:45:33 AM

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

It's a waste of time to argue with/against other coin supporters.

I stopped that, well, about ages ago and use my time to do something useful.

toknormal

legendary

Activity: 3066

Merit: 1188

Darkcoin "Architecturally Flawed"...

I'm involved in a discussion over on another thread where a Monero guy is possiting that Darkcoin is "Architecturally Flawed" due to the masternode architecture.

I've already posted quite a long response and he has come back with a whole load of cryptographic waffle which I haven't got time right now to respond to.

Could someone who knows what they're talking about have a look at this......

His original point: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10291319

My reply:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10293523

His:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10296615

Be polite.

Kienbui

sr. member

Activity: 478

Merit: 250

Quote from: Minotaur26 on January 28, 2015, 11:17:10 PM

Quote from: Kienbui on January 28, 2015, 10:35:01 PM

Darkcoin has many potential advantages with its master-node network.

Please consider volunteering we need representatives in as many countries as possible.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-ambassador-group.3785/#post-38962

Yeah. I am considering about how to contribute to Darkcoin.

Thank you!

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on January 28, 2015, 11:25:44 PM

Quote from: oblox on January 28, 2015, 03:01:29 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on January 28, 2015, 02:59:10 PM

Quote from: oblox on January 28, 2015, 02:17:05 PM

Can you really blame them? Both CA and NY state came out and said Coinbase's exchange isn't licensed there. That totally contradicts their big announcement.

Wow Seriously?!! You have a source for that Mr. Oblox?

http://www.coindesk.com/nydfs-coinbase-licensed-new-york/
http://www.coindesk.com/california-regulator-coinbase-exchange-regulated-licensed/

Talk about dropping the ball.

Well, that just looks to me like Coinbase believes they've done everything they should to be legal, and New York and California have their heads up their asses as they don't even have their regulations figured out.

To me, and I don't care either way, it looks like Coinbase is committed to doing the right thing, and the states are committed to covering their ass and not committing to anything.

I can't see why this would look bad for Coinbase, only looks bad for the states, IMHO.

It's Bitcoin... articles spun it that they were fully licensed and approved by those states and those states came out and said otherwise. It was premature, nothing more, nothing less.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: oblox on January 28, 2015, 03:01:29 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on January 28, 2015, 02:59:10 PM

Quote from: oblox on January 28, 2015, 02:17:05 PM

Can you really blame them? Both CA and NY state came out and said Coinbase's exchange isn't licensed there. That totally contradicts their big announcement.

Wow Seriously?!! You have a source for that Mr. Oblox?

http://www.coindesk.com/nydfs-coinbase-licensed-new-york/
http://www.coindesk.com/california-regulator-coinbase-exchange-regulated-licensed/

Talk about dropping the ball.

Well, that just looks to me like Coinbase believes they've done everything they should to be legal, and New York and California have their heads up their asses as they don't even have their regulations figured out.

To me, and I don't care either way, it looks like Coinbase is committed to doing the right thing, and the states are committed to covering their ass and not committing to anything.

I can't see why this would look bad for Coinbase, only looks bad for the states, IMHO.

Minotaur26

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Kienbui on January 28, 2015, 10:35:01 PM

Darkcoin has many potential advantages with its master-node network.

Please consider volunteering we need representatives in as many countries as possible.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-ambassador-group.3785/#post-38962

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3118. (Read 9723787 times)