Is this "just" about darksend got fixed or launch istantx too?
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3391. (Read 9723787 times)
December 04, 2014, 02:17:24 PM
<> Evan on testnet.
Is this "just" about darksend got fixed or launch istantx too?
Is this "just" about darksend got fixed or launch istantx too?
December 04, 2014, 01:57:43 PM
You can make it happen, support Evan and his project here -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.800
Copy and paste this
Evan Duffield - Darkcoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.800
VOTE FOR EVAN DUFFIELD IN COINSSOURCE'S PROOF OF HONOR VOTE!!!
Yes, it's time to show the world what the Darkness is about, once again!
I don't know of a developer who is more deserving...
https://twitter.com/darkcoinorg/status/539475273616732160
Twitter Voting Instructions:
https://www.rebelmouse.com/GetIntoTheDark/vote-evan-duffield-for-the-201-852705188.html
Please RT, bump when needed, and VOTE whenever you can! Details are in Tweet, or on my site.
GOOD LUCK, EVAN!
bump
EVAN DUFFIELD CURRENTLY TRAILING IN PROOF OF HONOR VOTING! IF YOU HAVEN'T VOTED YET, PLEASE DO!
December 04, 2014, 01:55:34 PM
Total Masternodes: 1376 = 1376 actives + 0 inactives (Last refresh: Thu Dec 04 2014 1:23:34 PM EST)
Soon, we will be getting paid every 3 days instead of 2....
Oh well, it's in the name of making the network stronger! December 04, 2014, 01:24:48 PM
Did you guys checked new Wolf0's speed improvement 
Tahiti ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...735#msg9717735
Pitcairn ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...135#msg9719135
Hawaii ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...735#msg9717735
Tahiti ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...735#msg9717735
Pitcairn ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...135#msg9719135
Hawaii ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to...735#msg9717735
December 04, 2014, 01:24:06 PM
Do you guys think Evan's lecture on the bitcoin expo will affect the price?
No
December 04, 2014, 01:04:30 PM
Do you guys think Evan's lecture on the bitcoin expo will affect the price?
No
December 04, 2014, 12:38:08 PM
Do you guys think Evan's lecture on the bitcoin expo will affect the price?
Sure! Just like the butterfly
December 04, 2014, 12:30:42 PM
Do you guys think Evan's lecture on the bitcoin expo will affect the price?
December 04, 2014, 12:15:02 PM
fake floor for sure
We get it, you're a negative little nancy.
December 04, 2014, 12:05:17 PM
fake floor for sure
December 04, 2014, 11:34:59 AM
Does anybody have a theory on why people sell at these price levels at all? Are they not informed about the potential? Wouldn't it make more sense to hold or place sell orders at a higher price when demand comes recurrently off the order book like that?
I have a chunk of DRK that I play with on the exchange, when the price rises to a predetermined price, I sell approx. 100drk and when the price falls to a certain point I buy back as much as possible to increase my position little by little....hoping for a 2nd MN someday.
Yep.. however this strategy only works when the price is moving up and down within a certain range.
It goes out of the window if it goes plummets / jumps up and stays there.
Well yeah that goes without saying. =D
December 04, 2014, 11:13:10 AM
Does anybody have a theory on why people sell at these price levels at all? Are they not informed about the potential? Wouldn't it make more sense to hold or place sell orders at a higher price when demand comes recurrently off the order book like that?
I have a chunk of DRK that I play with on the exchange, when the price rises to a predetermined price, I sell approx. 100drk and when the price falls to a certain point I buy back as much as possible to increase my position little by little....hoping for a 2nd MN someday.
Yep.. however this strategy only works when the price is moving up and down within a certain range.
It goes out of the window if it goes plummets / jumps up and stays there.
December 04, 2014, 11:07:50 AM
It is so hard to buy a node nowadays. Nobody wants to sell at 0.006xx anymore. I think we're into 7xx tonight.
Looks like somebody just bought a masternode at 0.006xx...
Does anybody have a theory on why people sell at these price levels at all? Are they not informed about the potential? Wouldn't it make more sense to hold or place sell orders at a higher price when demand comes recurrently off the order book like that?
I have a chunk of DRK that I play with on the exchange, when the price rises to a predetermined price, I sell approx. 100drk and when the price falls to a certain point I buy back as much as possible to increase my position little by little....hoping for a 2nd MN someday.
December 04, 2014, 10:29:34 AM
It is so hard to buy a node nowadays. Nobody wants to sell at 0.006xx anymore. I think we're into 7xx tonight.
Looks like somebody just bought a masternode at 0.006xx...
Yea I could have waited
December 04, 2014, 10:17:40 AM
It is so hard to buy a node nowadays. Nobody wants to sell at 0.006xx anymore. I think we're into 7xx tonight.
Looks like somebody just bought a masternode at 0.006xx...
Does anybody have a theory on why people sell at these price levels at all? Are they not informed about the potential? Wouldn't it make more sense to hold or place sell orders at a higher price when demand comes recurrently off the order book like that?
My guess is that it is short term traders. Bought low, selling higher. I regularly forget myself but DRK still qualifies as a risky long term investment.
December 04, 2014, 10:10:36 AM
Market is tight but someone keeps putting blocks up... Once we clear 650 I think we could fly up to around 750 pretty fast...
December 04, 2014, 10:10:31 AM
It is so hard to buy a node nowadays. Nobody wants to sell at 0.006xx anymore. I think we're into 7xx tonight.
Looks like somebody just bought a masternode at 0.006xx...
Does anybody have a theory on why people sell at these price levels at all? Are they not informed about the potential? Wouldn't it make more sense to hold or place sell orders at a higher price when demand comes recurrently off the order book like that?
December 04, 2014, 10:04:42 AM
It is so hard to buy a node nowadays. Nobody wants to sell at 0.006xx anymore. I think we're into 7xx tonight.
Looks like somebody just bought a masternode at 0.006xx...
December 04, 2014, 09:58:40 AM
How long does an instatX transaction take to be broadcasted on average?
Well technically it's broadcast immediately, like any other tx, but on testnet it was taking 15-20 secs for the consensus lock and full confirmation on the receive end.
The worse I got was like 40 seconds... But let it be perfectly clear. On mainnet it could be little longer. I think Evan mentioned this in the demo video, right?
I don't think that's an appropriate measure when it wasn't consistent by any means.
We're talking testnet, so I am obviously referring to successful attempts. Bugs still need to be ironed out.
Obviously you are talking testnet... it was never on mainnet. I'm simply saying that if it were consistent by any means, then you would have times to go off of but for the most part, things need to iron out before any meaningful measurement can be taken. The attempts made were around the time when the masternodes were about 10-12ish and dropping. And it was very few and far in between any successful lock.
yes indeed. I was just reporting my experience. What I meant by testnet was, in my experience, when IX came through, the majority of the time, at worse 40 seconds to come through. By no means I said it was flawless.
December 04, 2014, 09:45:50 AM
How long does an instatX transaction take to be broadcasted on average?
Well technically it's broadcast immediately, like any other tx, but on testnet it was taking 15-20 secs for the consensus lock and full confirmation on the receive end.
The worse I got was like 40 seconds... But let it be perfectly clear. On mainnet it could be little longer. I think Evan mentioned this in the demo video, right?
I don't think that's an appropriate measure when it wasn't consistent by any means.
We're talking testnet, so I am obviously referring to successful attempts. Bugs still need to be ironed out.
Obviously you are talking testnet... it was never on mainnet. I'm simply saying that if it were consistent by any means, then you would have times to go off of but for the most part, things need to iron out before any meaningful measurement can be taken. The attempts made were around the time when the masternodes were about 10-12ish and dropping. And it was very few and far in between any successful lock.
Jump to: