Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4027. (Read 9724017 times)

full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
crazy day in crypto, litecoin just lost 2nd place!

You mean regarding price of 1 unit?

There are coins like 42Coin who have even higher prices per unit than btc, so price per unit is not really relevant.

i was refering to the marketcap but for some reason Ripple doesent count.
I dont know anything about ripple so i cannot really comment.

I stand corrected, i apologise
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
crazy day in crypto, litecoin just lost 2nd place!

You mean regarding price of 1 unit?

There are coins like 42Coin who have even higher prices per unit than btc, so price per unit is not really relevant.
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
crazy day in crypto, litecoin just lost 2nd place!

Code:
1 Bitcoin 13.287.775 BTC 1 BTC        13,287,775 BTC 111.962 BTC 0.00 %
2 Litecoin        352.595 BTC 0.01095940 BTC 32,172,846 LTC    13.324 BTC -2.72 %
3 Peercoin 71.061 BTC 0.00326761 BTC 21,747,166 PPC    3.669 BTC        -19.87 %
4 Dogecoin   65.787 BTC 0.00000071 BTC 92,233,720,369      2.399 BTC         2.27 %
5 Darkcoin   41.540 BTC 0.00890571 BTC 4,664,381 DRK    970 BTC       1.47 %
6 Namecoin   26.556 BTC 0.00269582 BTC 9,850,650 NMC    675 BTC       -4.71 %


http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/filter-non-mineable-and-premined/#BTC
sr. member
Activity: 387
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
crazy day in crypto, litecoin just lost 2nd place!
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The Buck Stops Here.
I created a darksend demonstration on youtube (rc5):
part1: http://youtu.be/grtGRq4jGQc
part2: http://youtu.be/ZKKCWGwi2qo

enjoy.

I never realized you were so Scottish. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
I created a darksend demonstration on youtube (rc5):
part1: http://youtu.be/grtGRq4jGQc
part2: http://youtu.be/ZKKCWGwi2qo

enjoy.

Excellent.

Hey, you sound german.  Smiley
Gotta love ze germans talking english!

Bitte mach auch eine deutsche Version davon. Hat fast nichts deutsches was darkcoin related ist da draussen...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 505
I created a darksend demonstration on youtube (rc5):
part1: http://youtu.be/grtGRq4jGQc
part2: http://youtu.be/ZKKCWGwi2qo

enjoy.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
My Crystal Ball has been fired out of a cannon, into your face.
Yar.

And xpool.ca has fired a few DRK into my wallet today.

Thanks for recommending them, it's like afterlife for my "dead" SHA256 miners.

xpool.ca, mining DRK with whatever hardware. It works!
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The Buck Stops Here.
We need a PR person as well as a Kristov Atlas available to hire.

Earlier this week I was conducting a bit of a mining experiment with flare.  At one point we controlled nearly 5% of the network hashrate.

Anyway, I digress.  I think there needs to be a fund where people can donate a few duff to ultimately buy in the expertise that we might be missing as a community.  One idea I had was a CPU miner that only mines when your computer is idle but x% of mined blocks goes to the skill recruitment fund.  

People could either donate DRK if they have some to spare or just run an executable on their computer.

What do people think about this?  I reckon if enough of the community used their idle CPU cycles to mine from a dedicated NOMP instance then quite a hashrate could build up.  Obviously there is nothing stopping people from pointing their GPUs at it now and again.

Not only would it be good for the PR and Comms of Darkcoin, it'd be healthy for the network too!



I think that's a great idea.  I certainly would go back to mining for that purpose.  Right now.... well, I have my family server still mining but not hard and the minecraft server is up and running again, LOL.  But heck yah, I'd do that, and donate all to the fund.

Flare is going to run it by Evan and if it gets the nod, we're pretty much ready to go with a mining pool and CPU miner.   I just need to write a few guides on how to exclude minerd from your AV software as it is detected as malware by most AV solutions.

Basically I need to establish:

1)  Does the Darkcoin Foundation see a need for donations to fund testing and Quality Assurance/Management
2)  If so, where does the mining fee from the darkcointalk pool go?  Does it just cover costs of operating?
3)  If 2 is true, then would there be any objections from the dev team and community about setting up a pool that solely donates to a ringfenced fund to be used to bring in people or pay for hosting etc.

We might even be able to structure it so 0.5% goes to paying for the pool hosting and 1.5% goes to the fund.  Any remainder goes to the miners...



2) The DarkcoinTalk pool is for the cost of the forums. (Unprofitable) The mining fee's go towards the cost of the sites.

3) The hashrate of this pool is extremely small. It would absolutely help if more miners mined here instead of other ones. Instead of setting up another pool, this pool could be utilized for such. There would have to be an agreed upon terms and conditions none the less though.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
Quote
Can we see 0,01 by tonight?
i can predict the future
and i say no
My Crystal Ball has been fired out of a cannon, into your face.
Yar.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Quote
Can we see 0,01 by tonight?
i can predict the future
and i say no
TPN
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
How did it get so late, so soon?
Can we see 0,01 by tonight?
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
We need a PR person as well as a Kristov Atlas available to hire.

Earlier this week I was conducting a bit of a mining experiment with flare.  At one point we controlled nearly 5% of the network hashrate.

Anyway, I digress.  I think there needs to be a fund where people can donate a few duff to ultimately buy in the expertise that we might be missing as a community.  One idea I had was a CPU miner that only mines when your computer is idle but x% of mined blocks goes to the skill recruitment fund.  

People could either donate DRK if they have some to spare or just run an executable on their computer.

What do people think about this?  I reckon if enough of the community used their idle CPU cycles to mine from a dedicated NOMP instance then quite a hashrate could build up.  Obviously there is nothing stopping people from pointing their GPUs at it now and again.

Not only would it be good for the PR and Comms of Darkcoin, it'd be healthy for the network too!



I think that's a great idea.  I certainly would go back to mining for that purpose.  Right now.... well, I have my family server still mining but not hard and the minecraft server is up and running again, LOL.  But heck yah, I'd do that, and donate all to the fund.

Flare is going to run it by Evan and if it gets the nod, we're pretty much ready to go with a mining pool and CPU miner.   I just need to write a few guides on how to exclude minerd from your AV software as it is detected as malware by most AV solutions.

Basically I need to establish:

1)  Does the Darkcoin Foundation see a need for donations to fund testing and Quality Assurance/Management
2)  If so, where does the mining fee from the darkcointalk pool go?  Does it just cover costs of operating?
3)  If 2 is true, then would there be any objections from the dev team and community about setting up a pool that solely donates to a ringfenced fund to be used to bring in people or pay for hosting etc.

We might even be able to structure it so 0.5% goes to paying for the pool hosting and 1.5% goes to the fund.  Any remainder goes to the miners...

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Great explanation! But in fact it is a bit better than that:

If someone tries to double spend by trying to send two conflicting transactions, only one will be deemed valid by the current group of masternodes and the lock will be in place. That transaction will later be mined, but it is already valid because the miners will check the lock. The one without the valid lock will never get into a block because it conflicts with a valid lock. The payee that did not receive the validation can wait for block confirmations because maybe it is a rare case of valid transaction that has not been validated (rogue masternode or network problems), but he will know from the beginning that there is something wrong and can wait to release goods or services. Double spending not possible Smiley

Yah, I was trying to keep it simple.

But I'm wondering if the system can tell if there was a problem (especially for masternodes losing connections -nobody's fault).  Because if the transaction ends up in limbo for an hour, two hours, or however long Evan decides to make mining last, then it could really throw a spanner in the works, grinding some transactions to a halt.  If there could be a robust system, where mining could be sped up.............. but then, I can't see a way to do that...... Sad

Speculating now, but maybe it is possible to send some kind of message to the payee that is waiting for a validation if the funds are already locked by another tx.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
We need a PR person as well as a Kristov Atlas available to hire.

Earlier this week I was conducting a bit of a mining experiment with flare.  At one point we controlled nearly 5% of the network hashrate.

Anyway, I digress.  I think there needs to be a fund where people can donate a few duff to ultimately buy in the expertise that we might be missing as a community.  One idea I had was a CPU miner that only mines when your computer is idle but x% of mined blocks goes to the skill recruitment fund.  

People could either donate DRK if they have some to spare or just run an executable on their computer.

What do people think about this?  I reckon if enough of the community used their idle CPU cycles to mine from a dedicated NOMP instance then quite a hashrate could build up.  Obviously there is nothing stopping people from pointing their GPUs at it now and again.

Not only would it be good for the PR and Comms of Darkcoin, it'd be healthy for the network too!



I think that's a great idea.  I certainly would go back to mining for that purpose.  Right now.... well, I have my family server still mining but not hard and the minecraft server is up and running again, LOL.  But heck yah, I'd do that, and donate all to the fund.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
A Oneplus One Invite for someone in this community!
I LOVE YOU ALL! I'm not very active, but I was here since February.

This coin paid for my furniture, and made me financially independent (not rich, for now...)

Here's a gift for you:
https://account.oneplus.net/invite/claim/DIR9-YBA2-ZEEH-IRXU

Thank you Evan =)




I hope Evan sees this.  Congratulations on your success!
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
Great explanation! But in fact it is a bit better than that:

If someone tries to double spend by trying to send two conflicting transactions, only one will be deemed valid by the current group of masternodes and the lock will be in place. That transaction will later be mined, but it is already valid because the miners will check the lock. The one without the valid lock will never get into a block because it conflicts with a valid lock. The payee that did not receive the validation can wait for block confirmations because maybe it is a rare case of valid transaction that has not been validated (rogue masternode or network problems), but he will know from the beginning that there is something wrong and can wait to release goods or services. Double spending not possible Smiley

Yah, I was trying to keep it simple.

But I'm wondering if the system can tell if there was a problem (especially for masternodes losing connections -nobody's fault).  Because if the transaction ends up in limbo for an hour, two hours, or however long Evan decides to make mining last, then it could really throw a spanner in the works, grinding some transactions to a halt.  If there could be a robust system, where mining could be sped up.............. but then, I can't see a way to do that...... Sad
Jump to: