Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4216. (Read 9723787 times)

full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
The Beginning of Internet Privacy ?


Dark IRIS




like I said use the pyramid as the logo why not go all the way and use a knock off of the all seeing eye
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
The Beginning of Internet Privacy ?


Dark IRIS




I like this, my only concern with iris was conveying the opposite message, with Dark Iris I think is much more clear and I like your graphics. Nice
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
like I said use the pyramid as the logo why not go all the way and use a knock off of the all seeing eye
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
They should be fine, as Darksend should be disabled for those wallets, thus no large keypool issues (which were rare anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have no plans to mess with my MN wallet.dat files.
As my MN wallet.dat has a balance of 0.00 i will simply delete it on next update to v32+

I meant (and I think oblox said) the local/cold wallet that has the 1000DRK in it.
Exactly. I have wallet.dat created under RC3 so there is no need to change the file to new public addr right?
Btw. So far worked all fine.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
BIP32 (deterministic wallets based on seed phrases) would be really nice in this case because as long as you have the phrase,
restoring every possible key is as simple as restoring the wallet from the seed phrase.



Can't wait for this, it will make wallet management and security so much easier.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
They should be fine, as Darksend should be disabled for those wallets, thus no large keypool issues (which were rare anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have no plans to mess with my MN wallet.dat files.
As my MN wallet.dat has a balance of 0.00 i will simply delete it on next update to v32+

I meant (and I think oblox said) the local/cold wallet that has the 1000DRK in it.

Correct, the one holding the 1000 DRK.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
They should be fine, as Darksend should be disabled for those wallets, thus no large keypool issues (which were rare anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have no plans to mess with my MN wallet.dat files.
As my MN wallet.dat has a balance of 0.00 i will simply delete it on next update to v32+

I meant (and I think oblox said) the local/cold wallet that has the 1000DRK in it.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 101
They should be fine, as Darksend should be disabled for those wallets, thus no large keypool issues (which were rare anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have no plans to mess with my MN wallet.dat files.
As my MN wallet.dat has a balance of 0.00 i will simply delete it on next update to v32+
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Since it's not mandatory for MN opps, will cold-storage wallet files for a cold/remote masternode be fine running v30/v31?
They should be fine, as Darksend should be disabled for those wallets, thus no large keypool issues (which were rare anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I have no plans to mess with my MN wallet.dat files.

edit: if you use the QT client to manage your MN funds, make sure you disable Darksend before loading the MN wallet to withdraw payments etc., or load it in conjunction with the darkcoin.conf file associated with that MN, which should have masternode=1 in it, disabling Darksend.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
Whether it impacts me or not, I'm updating to the latest version.

Can't help it...
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250

- Added a darksend overview box showing some generic information


Yes. This... Rudimentary as it is, having it on the main wallet overview is crucial. Excellent.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
Since it's not mandatory for MN opps, will cold-storage wallet files for a cold/remote masternode be fine running v30/v31?
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
****** PLEASE UPDATE TO v9.12.32 (Stable) OR 10.12.32 (RC) *******

Due to the upgrade to a larger keypool in RC4, some users have reported slow client / lockups and in rare cases data corruption.
This only effects encrypted wallets and we have not seen this issue on freshly made wallets with the new keypool size at all.
If you're running RC4 with an encrypted wallet please migrate your funds to a new wallet running 10.12.32.
This doesn't effect the stable client at all (v0.9).

BIP32 (deterministic wallets based on seed phrases) would be really nice in this case because as long as you have the phrase,
restoring every possible key is as simple as restoring the wallet from the seed phrase.

This update is not mandatory for masternode operators

- Added a darksend overview box showing some generic information
- Display n/a in coincontrol for negative numbers
- force users to update to wallet version 60001 when they have an encrypted wallet

Source: Compile if you are running a pool, exchange, etc.

https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin

9.12.32 (Stable) Binaries: Does not include Darksend

Windows.exe: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-win.zip
Windows installer: https[Suspicious link removed]
Mac OSX: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-osx.dmg
Linux: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-linux.tar.gz

10.12.32 (RC) Binaries: Includes Darksend - Masternode Operators

Windows .exe: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-win.zip
Mac OSX: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-osx.dmg
Linux: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-linux.tar.gz

Nice work with the constant updates, very impressive.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
10.12.32 The Money Bags Update
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
****** PLEASE UPDATE TO v9.12.32 (Stable) OR 10.12.32 (RC) *******

Due to the upgrade to a larger keypool in RC4, some users have reported slow client / lockups and in rare cases data corruption.
This only effects encrypted wallets and we have not seen this issue on freshly made wallets with the new keypool size at all.
If you're running RC4 with an encrypted wallet please migrate your funds to a new wallet running 10.12.32.
This doesn't effect the stable client at all (v0.9).

BIP32 (deterministic wallets based on seed phrases) would be really nice in this case because as long as you have the phrase,
restoring every possible key is as simple as restoring the wallet from the seed phrase.

This update is not mandatory for masternode operators

- Added a darksend overview box showing some generic information
- Display n/a in coincontrol for negative numbers
- force users to update to wallet version 60001 when they have an encrypted wallet

Source: Compile if you are running a pool, exchange, etc.

https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin

9.12.32 (Stable) Binaries: Does not include Darksend

Windows.exe: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-win.zip
Windows installer: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-win32-setup.exe
Mac OSX: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-osx.dmg
Linux: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/darkcoin-0.9.12.32-linux.tar.gz

10.12.32 (RC) Binaries: Includes Darksend - Masternode Operators

Windows .exe: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-win.zip
Mac OSX: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-osx.dmg
Linux: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/master/rc/darkcoin-0.10.12.32-linux.tar.gz
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Thats a posibility, but in general, its more for speculatif point of view (exchange coin to coin), dont know if stability is not more importante ?

I dont said my point of view is good, its just mine at this time.  Wink


Its a good point.

Regulations are different in different countries. Something legal in one place, might be illegal in another.

So, it makes lots of sense to have an option to run or not a particular service.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
In the absence of DarkNet, I would go with:

  • MasterNet
  • DarkMesh
  • DarkSwarm
  • Hive by Dark

It has to be catchy and roll off the tongue...

Keep the creative juices flowing all...
sr. member
Activity: 447
Merit: 250
As a MN owner, I like the idea of making slow (or basic, you name it) browsing of MasterNet free, but as soon as one wants to watch videos, download, stream etc, make them pay. This way you get MUCH MORE people motivated to try out the service, and the ones willing to have something fast will pay.

This is a great idea. Limited at 64/128 kbps or something similar for those browsing for free, then whatever the network allows for those paying. I have no idea whether it's possible to implement though.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
How about free (basic, capped) access for maintaining, say 100DRK in your wallet? Or something along those lines - might help price stability?

Good enough for private email, chat etc.
Jump to: