Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4292. (Read 9723748 times)

I'm pretty sure a few strong hands sold too!

Crypto is taking a bloodbath across the board, and has been for days. That's part of the problem. Another part of the problem is communication. I understand and agree that Evan needs to be coding, but perhaps one of the other devs could communicate with eltito and get some official stuff posted. Namely, I believe, in this order:

1) What bugs/problems/issues are still out there with respect to RC4? Which are the most important to fix, and what is the timeline (approximate, not exact)?  You can see all the issues reported here: http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:issues-panel and they've been prioritized.
2) Post-mortem of the RC4 release. How things could be improved for RC5, any unexpected problems or successes, etc. Help people understand just how complex a release of this magnitude is, and let them know that if there were any avoidable problems, that you've learned from them.  I don't think we have mortem, LOL.  It's working very well for the vast majority of people without issue.  In fact there is talk on the forum of diving in and enforcing masternode payments.  What the heck, the price is in the dumps anyway, lets do it!
3) Which "problems" aren't really bugs but still need to be addressed, and how will they be addressed (e.g. necessity of making new backups due to the keypool increasing, and frequency of these backups).  Again, see that link, all the issues are posted and prioritized.
4) Overall health of the network and possible timeline on enforcement (We also a great deal of clarity about how much testing enforcement has gone through and exactly what it entails. I think a lot of people--likely myself included--don't really completely understand how the "spork" method actually works.) There is talk of doing it soon, not sure if developers agree though?  This time, it is the masternodes that will enforce and if blocks are found by non-paying miners, their blocks will be rejected until one that's playing fair finds the block.  Really, we need a good majority of everyone running RC4 before we pull the trigger.  Last I read, with all things included, it looks like we have 68% compliance.
5) Update, if any, on the Kristov review.  He is communicating exclusively with Evan.  Whatever he finds, he reports to Evan.  When he has finished his review, and given it to Evan, they will then let us know.  This is to prevent any learning curve or misunderstanding from being posted and becoming a huge issue in the community when it's not.  I'm sure Kristov will be thorough and he is probably already helping Evan with issues he sees?
6) Plans for RC5, the exciting announcement Evan hinted at, etc.  No idea, but it'll be fun to find out!

I believe we have a rock solid dev team and the fundamentals are sound. We just need to buckle down and keep doing what we're doing, get a little communication rolling, and the market will eventually see what we've got and price it accordingly.

Crypto is taking a bloodbath across the board, and has been for days. That's part of the problem. Another part of the problem is communication. I understand and agree that Evan needs to be coding, but perhaps one of the other devs could communicate with eltito and get some official stuff posted. Namely, I believe, in this order:

1) What bugs/problems/issues are still out there with respect to RC4? Which are the most important to fix, and what is the timeline (approximate, not exact)?  You can see all the issues reported here: http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:issues-panel and they've been prioritized.
2) Post-mortem of the RC4 release. How things could be improved for RC5, any unexpected problems or successes, etc. Help people understand just how complex a release of this magnitude is, and let them know that if there were any avoidable problems, that you've learned from them.  I don't think we have mortem, LOL.  It's working very well for the vast majority of people without issue.  In fact there is talk on the forum of diving in and enforcing masternode payments.  What the heck, the price is in the dumps anyway, lets do it!
3) Which "problems" aren't really bugs but still need to be addressed, and how will they be addressed (e.g. necessity of making new backups due to the keypool increasing, and frequency of these backups).  Again, see that link, all the issues are posted and prioritized.
4) Overall health of the network and possible timeline on enforcement (We also a great deal of clarity about how much testing enforcement has gone through and exactly what it entails. I think a lot of people--likely myself included--don't really completely understand how the "spork" method actually works.) There is talk of doing it soon, not sure if developers agree though?  This time, it is the masternodes that will enforce and if blocks are found by non-paying miners, their blocks will be rejected until one that's playing fair finds the block.  Really, we need a good majority of everyone running RC4 before we pull the trigger.  Last I read, with all things included, it looks like we have 68% compliance.
5) Update, if any, on the Kristov review.  He is communicating exclusively with Evan.  Whatever he finds, he reports to Evan.  When he has finished his review, and given it to Evan, they will then let us know.  This is to prevent any learning curve or misunderstanding from being posted and becoming a huge issue in the community when it's not.  I'm sure Kristov will be thorough and he is probably already helping Evan with issues he sees?
6) Plans for RC5, the exciting announcement Evan hinted at, etc.  No idea, but it'll be fun to find out!

I believe we have a rock solid dev team and the fundamentals are sound. We just need to buckle down and keep doing what we're doing, get a little communication rolling, and the market will eventually see what we've got and price it accordingly.

Hows camosoul?

The most annoying thing about this thread (and forums in general) is when people post an image with absolutely 0 context or explanation. We're not inside your head, tell us what we're looking at.

The most annoying thing about this thread (and forums in general) is when people post an image with absolutely 0 context or explanation. We're not inside your head, tell us what we're looking at.