Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4295. (Read 9723748 times)
August 18, 2014, 08:55:22 AM
I just bought some more DRK at 33 to try to even out my losses.
Am I just pouring good money after bad ? I don't know. Fundamentals aren't doing anything for the valuation right now. Just have to wait and see.
It's black Monday in cryptos.
August 18, 2014, 08:46:29 AM
fundamentals are rock solid
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
I am in for darkcoin, but stop typing this kind of non-sense.
2 months ago, we read almost same stuff:
"not panicking even if we drop below 0.01 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin."
If you are panicking then you invested too much, I can let this go all the way to zero and continue as if nothing happened. I am calm because fundamentals ARE solid. Prove me otherwise?
and yes I am in the top 50 rich list.
Edit: If the fundamentals were gone, I wouldnt be saying this, I would be selling...but im not.
August 18, 2014, 08:45:21 AM
When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files):
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
Just warning, normal.
August 18, 2014, 08:44:34 AM
Green shoots! Were back to .0033 lol if I couldn't laugh I would cry.
August 18, 2014, 08:43:40 AM
worth the read.
http://www.coindesk.com/margin-trading-crash-price-bitcoin/
this has been a complicated situation. there is a bunch of money that has moved out.
certainly the trolls and all the mud slinging hasnt helped any, but pales in what the effect of margin calls on btc and in turn the trickle effect its had is pretty evident.
RC4 even rolling out perfect would not have stopped the tide. What has happened was nothing Evan & devs are. its a market. trading driven thing. darcoin is no different then at any time in May. Development is solid. i obviously see the bottom here now for sure. im calling it. lets keep on rolling. the future is bright now!
http://www.coindesk.com/margin-trading-crash-price-bitcoin/
this has been a complicated situation. there is a bunch of money that has moved out.
certainly the trolls and all the mud slinging hasnt helped any, but pales in what the effect of margin calls on btc and in turn the trickle effect its had is pretty evident.
RC4 even rolling out perfect would not have stopped the tide. What has happened was nothing Evan & devs are. its a market. trading driven thing. darcoin is no different then at any time in May. Development is solid. i obviously see the bottom here now for sure. im calling it. lets keep on rolling. the future is bright now!
August 18, 2014, 08:42:08 AM
(I'm going to wait till all of the weak hands have left the building then I have some really cool stuff to announce).
-Evan
I contend that this has a good deal to do with Dark's sudden fall from grace. -Evan
You can't say an open statement like this and disappear. Especially since trading in and out of cryptos is so easy. I'm pretty sure a ton of traders were like 'fine, I'll sell now and come back once you announce this 'really cool stuff'.
JL
I think it's bigger than that. We've had downward pressure from the start of RC4.
The stolen BTC theory a few pages back makes sense.
None of this can be blamed on evan.
I am curious what his news is. God he is going to be waking up to this?
And looking forward to kristovs review.
Stolen BTC? Maybe. Who knows?
All I know is now that rc4 is released, shareholders and potential buyers are looking to the future and need more information. The only person who has said information is Evan. Might be time to tip your hand Evan. Help stop the bleeding.
August 18, 2014, 08:40:24 AM
I don't even want to think of the resistance on the upside from traders taking positions. Lets face it, it has fallen far enough that most traders will see some sort of opportunity here. I still have my MN's up. I just couldn't justify selling on what is, in fact, a working product. The crypto markets may lull till Q3/Q4 when the BTC etf is released. Then we should see some new inflows of money.
I have some more BTC coming in tomorrow and on Thursday but at this point, I'm tapped.
I have some more BTC coming in tomorrow and on Thursday but at this point, I'm tapped.
August 18, 2014, 08:36:55 AM
When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files):
etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
Quote
simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
out = dst;
^
blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
blake32(cc, data, len);
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
unsigned char *buf;
^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
out = dst;
^
blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
blake32(cc, data, len);
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
unsigned char *buf;
^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
August 18, 2014, 08:36:09 AM
fundamentals are rock solid
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
I am in for darkcoin, but stop typing this kind of non-sense.
2 months ago, we read almost same stuff:
"not panicking even if we drop below 0.01 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin."
true
same goes for "let the weak hands sell". thats by far the dumbest phrase in crypto-/stock-/whatevermarket.
August 18, 2014, 08:33:50 AM
fundamentals are rock solid
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
not panicking even if we drop below 0.001 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin.
I am in for darkcoin, but stop typing this kind of non-sense.
2 months ago, we read almost same stuff:
"not panicking even if we drop below 0.01 - they can try and dump as much as they want....we are the only legit altcoin."
August 18, 2014, 08:31:58 AM
I am impressed by the amount of sells in the 300s on Mintpal. 30k DRK to get up to 0.004, surely no one is that desperate to sell and this must be attributed to someone trying to keep price down - at least I hope so.
Like I said when price was 0.008, no reason to sell at this low of price, rather sit on it for a while and see what is to come. We are almost at pre-MN prices!
Like I said when price was 0.008, no reason to sell at this low of price, rather sit on it for a while and see what is to come. We are almost at pre-MN prices!
August 18, 2014, 08:28:02 AM
(I'm going to wait till all of the weak hands have left the building then I have some really cool stuff to announce).
-Evan
I contend that this has a good deal to do with Dark's sudden fall from grace. -Evan
You can't say an open statement like this and disappear. Especially since trading in and out of cryptos is so easy. I'm pretty sure a ton of traders were like 'fine, I'll sell now and come back once you announce this 'really cool stuff'.
JL
I think it's bigger than that. We've had downward pressure from the start of RC4.
The stolen BTC theory a few pages back makes sense.
None of this can be blamed on evan.
I am curious what his news is. God he is going to be waking up to this?
And looking forward to kristovs review.
August 18, 2014, 08:27:13 AM
(I'm going to wait till all of the weak hands have left the building then I have some really cool stuff to announce).
-Evan
I contend that this has a good deal to do with Dark's sudden fall from grace. -Evan
You can't say an open statement like this and disappear. Especially since trading in and out of cryptos is so easy. I'm pretty sure a ton of traders were like 'fine, I'll sell now and come back once you announce this 'really cool stuff'.
JL
August 18, 2014, 08:23:27 AM
(I'm going to wait till all of the weak hands have left the building then I have some really cool stuff to announce).
-Evan
I contend that this has a good deal to do with Dark's sudden fall from grace. -Evan
You can't say an open statement like this and disappear. Especially since trading in and out of cryptos is so easy. I'm pretty sure a ton of traders were like 'fine, I'll sell now and come back once you announce this 'really cool stuff'.
JL
August 18, 2014, 08:23:21 AM
YES YES YES moderated threads. Please. Who has time for all the garbage. This thread could be 700 pages of useful info instead of all this garbage!
August 18, 2014, 08:23:00 AM
Unbelievable! To think all the trolling they did here! So did they make a simple mistake? Was it pure incompetence? Or just a total fucking scam?
They failed their testing. Which indicates it wasn't a total scam (they submitted for testing and said they failed)
I think today is a bad day for crypto. We should all be drinking in pub not jabbing each other in the ribs.
(I own 0 cloak. I'm holding my DRK. - just tired of all the intercoin warfare)
Yes it get's incredibly tiresome at times...
I realise freedom of speech is king, however with all the enemies of Crypto and coin competition out there, we may have to put Brand damage before ideals and start using moderated threads more...
Moderated threads just means your trolls troll elsewhere. Keep it open and be able to respond to trolls.
August 18, 2014, 08:21:05 AM
Unbelievable! To think all the trolling they did here! So did they make a simple mistake? Was it pure incompetence? Or just a total fucking scam?
They failed their testing. Which indicates it wasn't a total scam (they submitted for testing and said they failed)
I think today is a bad day for crypto. We should all be drinking in pub not jabbing each other in the ribs.
(I own 0 cloak. I'm holding my DRK. - just tired of all the intercoin warfare)
Yes it get's incredibly tiresome at times...
I realise freedom of speech is king, however with all the enemies of Crypto and coin competition out there, we may have to put Brand damage before ideals and start using moderated threads more...
August 18, 2014, 08:15:26 AM
Obviously big player accumulating tons of DRK at these levels. Only time you see large stacked sell offers like that is when somebody wants more trying to scare holders. Please, go sell them all your dark, it is so easy in 3 simple steps:
1. Open arse.
2. Insert head.
3. Sell your DRK at .003
1. Open arse.
2. Insert head.
3. Sell your DRK at .003
August 18, 2014, 08:12:26 AM
When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files):
etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
Quote
simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
out = dst;
^
blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
blake32(cc, data, len);
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
unsigned char *buf;
^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
out = dst;
^
blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
blake32(cc, data, len);
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
unsigned char *buf;
^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc
It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks.
August 18, 2014, 08:10:53 AM
Unbelievable! To think all the trolling they did here! So did they make a simple mistake? Was it pure incompetence? Or just a total fucking scam?
They failed their testing. Which indicates it wasn't a total scam (they submitted for testing and said they failed)
I think today is a bad day for crypto. We should all be drinking in pub not jabbing each other in the ribs.
(I own 0 cloak. I'm holding my DRK. - just tired of all the intercoin warfare)
Jump to: