Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4788. (Read 9723796 times)

ROFL! Stop time,lol.

In all seriousness though, less time probably should spent on the most obvious pet trolls. I guess some people just like to argue.  

If we goes back to basics:

Look at the implementation, and 'crypto' as a concept. Crypto are not designed for money loan. And copying what Bank does, has no interest here. So a % is absurd. It had been wiser to look at a good POS+TOR like implementation, but this coin does nothing about that.

We have just an implementation that works as a parasitic POW process, and the anonymity added is minimal.


---
Reading the previous posts - I see a lot of people with only one goal taking over 20% of the new coins. The implementation of the anonymity was not done properly... And nobody here want to fix that...

Do you really think that such a coin has a future? Mastermade here is only the new 'premined' concept: 'postmined'...

i'm still worried how hackers could have succesfully hacked Mintpal .. i thought they had excellent
security measures in place ? with cold wallets seperate and all ?

It takes a lot of time and energy to troll this hard. Its fairly lame stuff, but seriously, if you thought Darkcoin was a waste of time, you wouldn't be wasting your time.

Time that is of limited supply on this one way journey we are all on. You give up time that you could otherwise be using to speak with friends, go out and sit in a park and enjoy fresh air, visit with family,  or help a charitable organisation.

You allocate this opportunity cost to your time for Darkcoin. You would not do it if you didn't think Darkcoin had a future. Thanks for pointing that out for all of us.

Just remember, what doesn't kill you just makes you stronger. Muchas Gracias, for making this community even stronger.

ahh.. so thats what these trolls were trying to do .. they were trying to stop time
makes sense now.

...which will be worth f*ck all without the masternode network.

One of the dumbest things that I've heard so far. How long did it take for Bitcoin to become a valid payment option, 6 months? Please.

Only thing is - your not at all confident about that happening, otherwise you wouldn't be spending 12 hours a day stuck to this thread trying to make it so.

Either that or you've just become so bitter & twisted that you need to offload some of that brain-rot on us all before it consumes you in a big ball of mould  

Go take a relaxing trip on your new boat before you self-destruct.

Mining on  pool that isn't enforcing the 20% tax is the logical thing to do at this point.  You will receive 100% of your mining efforts.  If and when any form of enforcement is implemented it could have serious consequences for the coin.  

Basically the masternode network is based on a flawed methodology.  The payments to the masternodes should be coming from the individuals using the network for anonymous transactions.  Not the miners securing the network.  I think Darkcoin is doomed unless they revisit the method used to pay the masternodes.

The thing Darkcoin should have done was work on giving users places to actually spend their Darkcoins.  As it is, even if RC4 works and you can send as many DRK anonymously as you want.  There is no place to spend them.  Darkcoins are basically useless as a payment option.

But hey, the masternode operators still get 20% for doing nothing.
 

That is not correct.

Only invalid blocks after enforcement begins will be orphaned. Anything before enforcement will remain unchanged. The block reward is 5 coins.  Enforcement on means it must be split 4+1 and off means some pools may give all 5 coins to the miners. No coins will appear or disappear after enforcement.

This shojayxt is just hilarious. He's claiming making a lot of money with DRK, then said enough with DRK but still non-stop spreading FUDs about DRK, even with bold fonts, capital letters and go everywhere in bitcointalk forum to continue to attack DRK. The most hard-working troller ever.  

What's his goal? To warn and protect new users/miner? I doubt about it.

With enforcement, and the exchanges on the correct version, any noncompliant blocks will be orphaned instantly, the coins will not confirm on the exchanges, the miners will not be able to sell them. They can go on mining on their incorrect fork all they like, it will have zero effect on anyone else.

No problem.

Just like you did. He won. He is a winner. You lost.

You Sir, won the official Bitcointalk award for the most annoying, stubborn and unintelligent trolls ever.
Day by day posting non-existing issues under the false "concerns" for the "people".

You are making joke out of yourself, and your trolling is very obvious.
Go back to whatever scam coin you hold.
I'm surprised that folks here still carry on discussion with you. Back to ignore.

I agree, Mintpal by their own admission got hacked, Mintpal should foot the bill. (And people should learn not to use exchanges as banks.)

Don't you mean  "Being in decline".  Because that's what it is.  Darkcoin is in decline.  History usually repeats itself and Darkcoin will be no different.  Something else will always come along.  Darkcoins glory days have come and gone.  It's now a slow descent into oblivion like hundreds of coins before it.  

Warning: this is a genuine question/concern.

What happens when people mine in pools which have not updated yet to the latest version, thus which is not paying MN's 20% of the block reward?

The mined blocks with previous versions of the Darkcoin daemon will or may be orphaned when RC4 is released or when the enforcement would be activated now during RC3? The mined coins would then be worthless to the miner?

However, what happens when a non-compliant miner immediately sells his mined Darkcoins on an exchange? Does this mean that coins which anyone has purchased recently, may at some point be removed from their wallet, as they may have come from (orphaned) blocks mined by a non-compliant miner?

If that would be true (and I don't know if it is), consequently, it seems to me that Evan has no choice NOT to use the enforcement switch without hurting some people. Technically yes, but the effect might be a unpleasant change for some people?

If I'm wrong, great, then I don't have to worry about this, because I just bought some more before realizing this, but if I'm right, it means the enforcement switch is not really a valid countermeasure after all. This would mean that anyone can continue to mine on non-compliant pools and take 20% more revenue and not have to worry about this being fruitless?

Can anyone confirm or rectify my understanding?

Thanks,

Why are you paying them 20%  They are not providing any service at this time.  According to the latest White Paper you are limited to sending 10 DRK.
  There are limitations in place to improve the anonymity of DarkSend, you can send up to 10 DRK.

Did I miss something?  Has that 10 DRK limit been lifted?  If not then the masternodes are not doing a damn thing to earn 20%.

That hardfork is going to be a challenge and even if they succeed it sets a really bad precedent.

Scary thing is that if this was a month or so ago DRK is the likely target because we were at the height of our popularity to date doing about 5000BTC a day on Mintpal. Guess being in a bit of a lull turns out to be a blessing in disguise.  

I want to make sure that this Darkcoin supporters post stays visible for all to see.  This is what they think about you miners.  They take your money and then call you lazy parasites.  This is the face of Darkcoin.  Arrogance and greed.