Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4915. (Read 9723748 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500

afaik there will be no enforcement

its all done in one step with RC4 and thats what bothers me a little. if anything goes wrong with RC4, enforcement will be delayed even past RC4 date...

If it goes right it's all done in one shot and we can actually start promoting the coin for real world use though. And the big thing about RC4 is actually the anonymity.
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Just wait people . Only 10days left.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250

afaik there will be no enforcement

its all done in one step with RC4 and thats what bothers me a little. if anything goes wrong with RC4, enforcement will be delayed even past RC4 date...
Aaaaaha didn't know that. Good to know that Wink
That makes me think....

maybe i am wrong, but thats the latest i heard

lets see if some "staff" answers this

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-development-and-path-going-forward.1604/

and https://darkcointalk.org/threads/status-update-7-1-2014.1675/
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
Thanks all . Just bad luck then story of my life lol


Thanks for checking

If it makes you feel any better, one of my MNs has only been elected twice since payments began, and on both occasions wasn't paid. It'll even out with time...  Smiley

And hope that make even better for you both...

one of my MN even haven't get a chance to be unpaid since it's been setup.... Grin
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019

afaik there will be no enforcement

its all done in one step with RC4 and thats what bothers me a little. if anything goes wrong with RC4, enforcement will be delayed even past RC4 date...
Aaaaaha didn't know that. Good to know that Wink
That makes me think....

maybe i am wrong, but thats the latest i heard

lets see if some "staff" answers this
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!

afaik there will be no enforcement

its all done in one step with RC4 and thats what bothers me a little. if anything goes wrong with RC4, enforcement will be delayed even past RC4 date...
Aaaaaha didn't know that. Good to know that Wink
That makes me think....
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019

afaik there will be no enforcement

its all done in one step with RC4 and thats what bothers me a little. if anything goes wrong with RC4, enforcement will be delayed even past RC4 date...
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
Definitely calm me Smiley
calm good boy Cheesy
IMO next week we will see the enforcment.
After all will go on good next week max 10 days Evan will release the RC4.
If you wanna more cheap chips go ahead now because next week we can be @ 0.016 steady ready for next prepump for RC4
If RC4 ok we will not see 0.02 again.
sr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 250
Sorry to hear that but thanks I feel a lot better now ..  It'll sort it self out
Thanks all
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Thanks all . Just bad luck then story of my life lol


Thanks for checking

If it makes you feel any better, one of my MNs has only been elected twice since payments began, and on both occasions wasn't paid. It'll even out with time...  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
Iam
I was trying to calm the new setuper Wink
sr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 250
Thanks all . Just bad luck then story of my life lol


Thanks for checking
dont worry 50% of my MNs still have 0 drk because of non-updated pools grrrrr
when we talk about luck the address which has 26drk is very lucky so... Lol

I'm in darks for the long term as long as I know it's all working fine I'm happy . Sit back relax .
Just need these pools to update then we are rolling. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
Thanks all . Just bad luck then story of my life lol


Thanks for checking
dont worry 50% of my MNs still have 0 drk because of non-updated pools grrrrr
when we talk about luck the address which has 26drk is very lucky so... Lol
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Whats does it mean if your address is in the "Expected Masternode Payee[from getblocktemplate]" column but in the "Masternode Payee[from confirmed block]" column is another persons address?
The pool was supposed to pay me but paid someone else? Is that someone else random or can they manipulate the votes to pay themselves?



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7662205

Payee of getblocktemplate can be different per node.

My code search tx[1]vout for payee like this.
1) compare tx[1]vout  with previous recorded getblocktemplate result +3) : hit : got equlto, fail next.
2) compare tx[1]vout  with current Masternode pubkey list +3) : hit : got innmlist, fail next.
3) compare tx[1]vout[value] : >= totalvalue / 10, < totalvalue / 3 : hit got not_detected. next (time outed node can be a payee)
4)  tx[1]vout == 1 : got tx_0_vout_1 / not paid

So innmlist means == diffrent payee with result of getblocktemplate(can be different), but payee is in Masternodelist.




Ok that makes sense, thanks for the fast reply as always
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
it's the one he linked --> http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

Ah !!!

Now it's become clear. You only see that stuff if you put a filter in for the address your interested in.

This suddenly explains everything ! I can see that with enforcement active, I'd have gained another 11 DRK. That's how many payments I've been skipped over due to pools with legacy miner software.


tx_0_vout_1 alone accounts for 7 missing payments.

Fantastic stuff !!!, thanks.



Ouch that is some serious bad luck there man
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Whats does it mean if your address is in the "Expected Masternode Payee[from getblocktemplate]" column but in the "Masternode Payee[from confirmed block]" column is another persons address?
The pool was supposed to pay me but paid someone else? Is that someone else random or can they manipulate the votes to pay themselves?



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7662205

Payee of getblocktemplate can be different per node.

My code search tx[0]vout for payee like this.
1) compare tx[0]vout  with previous recorded getblocktemplate result +3) : hit : got equlto, fail next.
2) compare tx[0]vout  with current Masternode pubkey list +3) : hit : got innmlist, fail next.
3) compare tx[0]vout[value] : >= totalvalue / 10, < totalvalue / 3 : hit got not_detected. next (time outed node can be a payee)
4)  tx[0]vout == 1 : got tx_0_vout_1 / not paid

So innmlist means == diffrent payee with result of getblocktemplate(can be different), but payee is in Masternodelist.


legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
it's the one he linked --> http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

Ah !!!

Now it's become clear. You only see that stuff if you put a filter in for the address your interested in.

This suddenly explains everything ! I can see that with enforcement active, I'd have gained another 11 DRK. That's how many payments I've been skipped over due to pools with legacy miner software.


tx_0_vout_1 alone accounts for 7 missing payments.

Fantastic stuff !!!, thanks.

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Whats does it mean if your address is in the "Expected Masternode Payee[from getblocktemplate]" column but in the "Masternode Payee[from confirmed block]" column is another persons address?
The pool was supposed to pay me but paid someone else? Is that someone else random or can they manipulate the votes to pay themselves?

Jump to: