Your going to see sub 0.01 prices. I told you all this would happen weeks ago but you all said I was stating FUD. Go look at my previous posts from a month ago if you want to know what's actually happening to the market.
Expect strong resistance @ 0.01, but expect it to drop through shortly after. Play the swings here and rebuy back @ 0.008, I'm fairly confident this is the floor.
If anyone here even tries to say this is FUD and not sound investment advice ill digitally slap you across this forum.
Hopefully you'll all be able to make some money from this fall, there will be a recovery once the bottom has formed. Don't expect it to be sharp though.
Peaceeeee
Expect strong resistance @ 0.01, but expect it to drop through shortly after. Play the swings here and rebuy back @ 0.008, I'm fairly confident this is the floor.
If anyone here even tries to say this is FUD and not sound investment advice ill digitally slap you across this forum.
Hopefully you'll all be able to make some money from this fall, there will be a recovery once the bottom has formed. Don't expect it to be sharp though.
Peaceeeee
See, I have no problem with this post. I've bolded the reason above. I didn't like your posts around a month ago because you were "150% certain" something was going to happen and just generally came across very confrontational. The post from today doesn't have that, and indeed, seems quite polite (to me).
Others might not see this the same way.
I agree, but technically, he was wrong a month ago....
But, I'll pretend to be him for a second and say we're going up to .015... Might take a week, might take a year. I'll return when it does, and will ignore any sort of swing, in either direction, in the meantime.
All because you had some stabilised time during a crash doesn't mean you wern't in a crash. The RC3 deadline caused speculators to inflate the price after this crash, this is all they did. It's now back on its previous trajectory.
And yes. Buying now is also a sound investment decision. It will test 0.015 again at some point. It just misses out of optimum profit potential.
Fair enough, and I don't disagree with anything that you've said. If anything, your second point agrees with my initial in that you missed out on optimum profit potential during the climb back up to .02 when you were saying .01.
