Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5174. (Read 9723733 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001


New TA posted on Darkcointalk, check it out
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/technical-analysis.931/page-2

The only thing is, I'd like to know the timeline on the chart??
It says in the text above the chart, this is a daily chart. (Higher timeframes give more reliable signals)

Oh, well, that's too hard for me to figure out, ROFL

Thanks... so many letters, so many numbers, I get confused!   Cry
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Hi, i have just set up a local/remote masternode, with local masternode on windows and remote on linux ubuntu 14.04 server. Everything works fine till i close the local wallet. Then after a few minutes the remote masternode is listed as offline. What am i doing wrong? Sorry i am a linux noob...

I had the same issue then figured out i missed steps 17. and 18. from the guide: https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/how-to-set-up-ec2-t1-micro-ubuntu-for-masternode-part-2-3.241/

make sure you follow it EXACTLY and it works fine now Smiley

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
4. 8 hours for bitcoin to sync? sounds about right, but I have seen it take as little as 6 and as many as 48. depends on a lot of factors.

5. 64 hours for monero to sync? howabout 6. I have downloaded and used monero in 3 different machines, it usually takes 6 - 8 hours to sync. do your home work buddy.

I'm seriously not trying to pick on monero or anyone, but isn't monero about half as old as drk?  If it already takes 6 hours to sync, I would think there is a serious problem with the size of the blockchain.  DRK only takes about 10 minutes.  Now this might be because the wallets aren't getting connections.  But if that's not the case, I would think that is an issue that needs to be dealt with immediately.

I mean, we have our own issues we need to resolve still, such as darksending larger amounts and improvements to anonymity, etc... all in the works.  But one can't turn a blind eye to a bloated block chain either.  That could quickly cripple a coin. Just saying.

On the other hand, I know the developers are aware of this.  I am looking forward to seeing their solution.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
This is why I like Darkcoin!  Grin

I don't know why I decided to draw this today, but for some reason I felt compelled.

http://razorsforex.blogspot.com/2014/06/why-i-like-darkcoin-and-anonymous.html


member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Hi, i have just set up a local/remote masternode, with local masternode on windows and remote on linux ubuntu 14.04 server. Everything works fine till i close the local wallet. Then after a few minutes the remote masternode is listed as offline. What am i doing wrong? Sorry i am a linux noob...
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Yes have port 9999 open on the local to verify with the remote during the initial setup. Then you'll be able to close the local wallet and port.

Thanks. Now me and my millions can plan for our next move.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The Buck Stops Here.
I'm trying to set up a local wallet + remote wallet masternode configuration. My local machine is a windows pc, and when I finally get to the point where I can type "masternode start mypassword" I get the following error:

inbound port is not open. Please open it and try again. (19999 for testnet and 9999 for mainnet)

Question: do I have to have port 9999 open in the local wallet as well?

This is my local .conf:
addnode=23.23.186.131
masternode=1
masternodeaddr=REMOTE_IP:9999
masternodeprivkey=***


And this is the remote .conf:
addnode=23.23.186.131
listen=1
masternode=1
maxconnections=256
masternodeprivkey=***


Question: do I have to have port 9999 open in the local wallet as well?

Only if it's not communicating with your remote.

I don't understand, is that a yes?


But maybe it's your masternodeprivkey causing the problem?  They should both have the local wallet's (with the 1000 dark) masternodeprivkey= number.

Yes, both wallet's .conf file has the masternodeprivkey generated on the local wallet.


The local masternode address, if it has anything, it should be it's own masternodeprivkey, not the remote's.  Not 100% sure it is needed, but mine has it, and it is the local privkey in the local conf. (edit: I do think it needs it in order to be started as a masternode Smiley )

The remote also gets the local privkey.  Not sure if you just wrote that up backwards, but it won't work unless remote has local's privkey.

Isn't this the same thing you said above, "They should both have the local wallet's (with the 1000 dark) masternodeprivkey= number" ?


Yes have port 9999 open on the local to verify with the remote during the initial setup. Then you'll be able to close the local wallet and port.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
I'm trying to set up a local wallet + remote wallet masternode configuration. My local machine is a windows pc, and when I finally get to the point where I can type "masternode start mypassword" I get the following error:

inbound port is not open. Please open it and try again. (19999 for testnet and 9999 for mainnet)

Question: do I have to have port 9999 open in the local wallet as well?

This is my local .conf:
addnode=23.23.186.131
masternode=1
masternodeaddr=REMOTE_IP:9999
masternodeprivkey=***


And this is the remote .conf:
addnode=23.23.186.131
listen=1
masternode=1
maxconnections=256
masternodeprivkey=***


Question: do I have to have port 9999 open in the local wallet as well?

Only if it's not communicating with your remote.

I don't understand, is that a yes?


But maybe it's your masternodeprivkey causing the problem?  They should both have the local wallet's (with the 1000 dark) masternodeprivkey= number.

Yes, both wallet's .conf file has the masternodeprivkey generated on the local wallet.


The local masternode address, if it has anything, it should be it's own masternodeprivkey, not the remote's.  Not 100% sure it is needed, but mine has it, and it is the local privkey in the local conf. (edit: I do think it needs it in order to be started as a masternode Smiley )

The remote also gets the local privkey.  Not sure if you just wrote that up backwards, but it won't work unless remote has local's privkey.

Isn't this the same thing you said above, "They should both have the local wallet's (with the 1000 dark) masternodeprivkey= number" ?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
sr. member
Activity: 409
Merit: 250


New TA posted on Darkcointalk, check it out
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/technical-analysis.931/page-2

The only thing is, I'd like to know the timeline on the chart??
It says in the text above the chart, this is a daily chart. (Higher timeframes give more reliable signals)
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Dark Wallet is open source. Anyone can copy and develop for their coin yet no coin has AFAIK. At the moment not many financial incentives to develop it, as it primarily benefits bitcoin.

Darksend is closed source because of copying and hype concerns. The team wants to perfect the code before releasing the code. However, full valuation cannot be reached until the code is open. Gmaxwell stated he will not audit closed source code, which is fair enough. We cannot have our cake and eat it. Code auditors will probably not fully dispel suspicion anyway. If code is opened up, auditors won't be required because everyone will do their own checks. Just one viewpoint among many I'm sure.

The real concern is releasing code that does not fully work and causing price of darkcoin to plummet. That would be a tragedy but on the other hand more solutions will pop up from other vectors, which darkcoin can use. Difficult choice. I think this may take a while to sort out.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
HAHAHA !! Brilliant stuff  Grin

http://www.coindesk.com/list-possible-silk-road-bitcoin-bidders-allegedly-leaked-us-marshals/
specifically
Quote
We apologize for the error.
mega LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCSA7kKNu2Y

Of the 172 people who thumbs downed that video becasue they never learned how to BCC, these are some of them...

They can't even do basic computer. How sad.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
www.OroCoin.co
the wallet links also have not worked on over a month
Blatant lies. Why would you even bother to say something like this?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/monero-and-darkcoin-are-the-top-privacy-coins-626139

My take on Darkcoin, Bitcoin, and Bytecoin Clones(monero, quazarcoin, honeypenny etc).




_______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________

Why Bytecoin/Monero and other Cryptonote Clones Should Not be Used:
I know many of you must know of the Cryptonote Coins, such as Bytecoin, Quazarcoin, Monero, HoneyPenny, and FantomCoin ( https://cryptonote.org/coins.php)

I have researched those coins long and hard, here are my conclusions on why they would never work.

1) Monero, Quazarcoin, HoneyPenny, and FantomCoin are all Clones of Bytecoin
2) Those 4 coins all possess the exact same features as Bytecoin since they were forked/cloned from Bytecoin's sourcecode
3) They all use Ring Signatures for anonymity, but the problem is, Ring Signatues has severe bloating issues, to the extent that the Monero blockchain is 8x bigger than then Bitcoin Blockchain
4) The Bitcoin Blockchain takes an average 8 hours to fully sync(faster or longer depending on the comp)
5) 8x8 is 64, so that means the Monero blockchain takes 64 hours to fully sync, which means that you would be unable to send or recieve transactions until that 64 hours is over and the blockchain is fully synced
6) Monero has been destroyed by Botnets, which are computers compromised by Hackers that mine Monero 24/7, 365, I wouldn't be surpised if Hackers control more than  70% of the Monero coin Supply atm
7) None of the 4 Cryptonote Clones have any innovation

Conclusion: Bytecoin is the only reputable coin out of all the Cryptonote clones because; They(Monero, Quazarcoin, HoneyPenny, and FantomCoin) were cloned/copied from Bytecoin, and because of that, are extremely unlikely to have much of a future, Clones
never make it far.



I've decided to make this thread to show the light on Bitcoin, Cryptonote Clone Coins, and Darkcoin.

interesting analysis. however, you couldnt be more wrong or biased against cryptonote. I am happy to see someone is so intimidated by monero and the likes =)

1. "...clones of bytecoin" bytecoin is 80% premined. the monero devs saw potential in the concept, but needed to do something about the premine issue, so monero was created with a fair distribution. Once people saw the succes/potential of monero, copycats popped up. see fantomcoin, quazarcoin, honeypenny, and boolberry.

2. "...exact same features as bytecoin" false, not even close, do some homework buddy.

3. 8 times bigger? again, do your homework.

4. 8 hours for bitcoin to sync? sounds about right, but I have seen it take as little as 6 and as many as 48. depends on a lot of factors.

5. 64 hours for monero to sync? howabout 6. I have downloaded and used monero in 3 different machines, it usually takes 6 - 8 hours to sync. do your home work buddy.

6. "destroyed by botnets, hackers 70% blah blah..." - do your fucking homework buddy

7. none of the cryptonote clones have innovation - This is the point that made it most obvious to me that you are seriously intimidated by XMR

disclaimer - I hold drk and xmr both. bout the same amount of each. however, this is just fud, i don't appreciate people spreading lies about my investments, no matter which one is it
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
Yah, so 8AM Pacific.  If I can get to sleep that night, I'll wake up to coins dropping from heaven, LOL
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Any guesses as to what the exact time the fork will be ?

16:00 GMT

#define START_MASTERNODE_PAYMENTS 1403280000 //Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:00:00 GMT


legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
Darkbids.com is being built, won't be long now.

twitter: @darkbids

Fantastic, I will be using this Smiley

Don't be too excited, I put all my info in and then realized too late that it was only demo and there is no security yet ;P  Least I made up a new password not used anywhere else (whew!)  LOL

Still... I need to be more careful.  I just decided a while ago that I would trust this when it was first announced in order to support what I think will be one of the most important things to come to the crypto world Cheesy. Please don't let us down, give it excellent security please!

Although the site doesn't have encryption just yet it does have several forms of security already added to it. Also, there are no coins stored on the site, nor will there be, and I am the only one on the site with access to anyone's info. If that doesn't make you feel better, I also run several other crypto related sites and I'm not too difficult to track down if you have any questions.

No problem, I'm gonna be all in on that one.  Hopefully we'll eventually get some good trade going on there!  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001


New TA posted on Darkcointalk, check it out
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/technical-analysis.931/page-2

The only thing is, I'd like to know the timeline on the chart??
Jump to: