Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5231. (Read 9723782 times)

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: Jesse Livermore on June 12, 2014, 01:12:46 PM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.

I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions!

if it'll really be trustless like he said (which would be really awesome) then there's no need for caution.
But as I see it a trustless solution would have to be coded into the Coin by Evan. Something like allowing a multipart Masternode tx input.

Thats the thing. For a MN to work, it MUST have a 1k deposit on an address 0. Meaning, that whatever solution for a "trustless" handover of DRK, these will have to be pulled together as one single transfer, in one single tx id.

So the bottleneck here is the 1k deposit. You cant add multiple inputs to make 1k.

Making a multisig 1k would only end up in a mess-up. You only need 1 bad actor to screw it all up.

Delita Heiral

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on June 12, 2014, 01:15:38 PM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.

Bump again, ive wanted to do this since nodes went live but dont have the experience <3

Donho

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 10

Quote from: Jesse Livermore on June 12, 2014, 01:12:46 PM

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: Jesse Livermore on June 12, 2014, 01:12:46 PM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.

I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions!

if it'll really be trustless like he said (which would be really awesome) then there's no need for caution.
But as I see it a trustless solution would have to be coded into the Coin by Evan, it's not something a third party could do. Something like allowing a multipart Masternode tx input. At least I can't think of third party trustless solution to this

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

I've got to imagine a shared MN would be something to the likes of sending X percentage of coins to the MN DRK address, that address runs the node. Any payments from the reward are divided up proportionally to the amount of DRK sent less some sort of maintenance fee (2%). Definitely an interesting take on generating passive income for those that fall short of the 1K threshold.

GhostPlayer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.

I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions!

Jesse Livermore

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: tungfa on June 12, 2014, 12:14:58 PM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.

ntrn500

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Compiled on Linux, the latest commit (bfb4e53d104b2a4caae04f18db195ed521a75d85). The wallet works fine, but the version it shows on "About DarkCoin" is v0.9.4.13-1-gbfb4e53-beta and "getinfo" shows version 91000. I guess that everything is fine but the confusion comes from a negligible bug?

./build/build.h:#define BUILD_DESC "v0.9.4.13-1-gbfb4e53"

tungfa

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1023

[/quote]

there is an extra tail "0" correct link is:

https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.zip
[/quote]

Tx man

predatorkill

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

URL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.0.zip
does NOT work

Tx for the dropbox (working)

there is an extra tail "0" correct link is:

https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.zip

tungfa

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1023

Quote from: instacalm on January 18, 2014, 12:54:53 PM

DarkCoin Mac OS X Update v0.9.10
updated 12 June 2014, built with latest OpenSSL 1.0.1h

URL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.0.zip

mirror: https://www.dropbox.com/s/abanwlp72yz7zur/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.zip

zip shasum: 7df7f3e4964ee897fdf6bda81d455f80eccd69c0

🌟 Fellow Mac user! If you appreciate this release please support me by sending a DRK coffee tip, any amount is appreciated!

DRK: XtwzEuurDTNeVK5a26AzzZDdVkkPkAQ7Eu

Note: If your wallet fails to update to the latest block, carefully do the following:

0. Reminder: always have a backup of your wallet.dat
1. make sure that your DarkCoin.app resides in your Applications folder and is closed
2. delete peers.dat and remove all addnode= entries from your darkcoin.conf (if you have one)
3. fire up Terminal.app and paste this to reindex the Blockchain:

Code:

/Applications/DarkCoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/DarkCoin-Qt -reindex

-- voilà, it syncs to the latest block.

Donations List (pm me your username to appear here), thank you!

Quote

2014-05-05 +1.45662795
2014-05-13 +5
2014-05-14 +30
2014-05-16 +0.01
2014-05-18 +1
2014-05-21 +0.1
2014-05-21 +0.4
2014-05-27 +1
2014-05-27 +2 (thx bloxton)
2014-05-28 +5

URL: https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v0.9.10.0.zip
does NOT work

Tx for the dropbox (working)

splawik21

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1005

DASH is the future of crypto payments!

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:58:23 AM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

agree..possibly on remote/local wallet.(centralisation right)

btw. already rebought all my coins fu*k the loss i WANT drkcoins. Think that this prices today are seen be us the last time in history of darkcoin. Prepare for rush to 20 june LOL

GhostPlayer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

havn't thought of centralization, good point sir

Mining pools are centralised too, right? You can always solo mine, or p2pool mine. Or trust a collective pooled.

There will always be good and bad actors.

naxin

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

There is already one of such projects working:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dyslexiczombeis-darkcoin-community-masternode-svcs-closed-nodes-2-4-5-refunds-626715

i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.

it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

I'm already working on it

Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.

predatorkill

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: predatorkill on June 12, 2014, 11:40:46 AM

I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.

I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.

havn't thought of centralization, good point sir

fernando

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500