imagine how much crypto/money they lost on trying to FUD DRK .d
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5440. (Read 9723787 times)
May 30, 2014, 03:05:09 AM
FUDers can FUD them self now...
imagine how much crypto/money they lost on trying to FUD DRK .d
imagine how much crypto/money they lost on trying to FUD DRK .d
May 30, 2014, 03:03:25 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
Sounds like the government has you scared. If everyone thought like that nothing would get done.
OMG. Put it to rest. DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence. I'm talking strictly dumb business decision on Finex's part. Sorry if I hurt your DRK feelings.
Actually I think this is my first time commenting here. I just invested a little so I was browsing this. You sound like you feel like arguing with the wind tonight or maybe just a troll. Can't tell.
my guess is spreading a little FUD.
May 30, 2014, 03:02:50 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
The view on regulation is currently being considered in a similar light to Bitcoin. The Bank Secrecy Act and existing AML policies towards digital currency will still apply. In general, moving in and out of fiat requires the use of regulated entities.
Non disclosure of financial transactions on a blockchain ledger is not a reason to stop anonymity tools such as Darkcoin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7bbDpwlTws&feature=youtu.be&t=11m48s
~12mins
May 30, 2014, 03:01:59 AM
imagine FUDers now when we are on 3rd place again
what? what you say? are you talking to me? to darkcoin? to darksend?
what? what you say? are you talking to me? to darkcoin? to darksend?
May 30, 2014, 03:01:44 AM
Cool ! ("Nice !", then "Cool !" next will be "Great !" 
)
You want good news??
Bitfinex just decided to trade Darkcoin.
)You want good news??
Bitfinex just decided to trade Darkcoin.
WTF THIS IS HUGE - CONGRATS DARKCOIN
I dont own any darkcoin and btc is slow to get to mintpal by the time my btc gets there darkcoin would be already at the moon
To utclover:
Did you predict a correction on xc some hours ago, that was deleted from there tread ? If so, nice prediction
, I should have seen and followed that .. May 30, 2014, 03:01:39 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
Sounds like the government has you scared. If everyone thought like that nothing would get done.
OMG. Put it to rest. DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence. I'm talking strictly dumb business decision on Finex's part. Sorry if I hurt your DRK feelings.
Actually I think this is my first time commenting here. I just invested a little so I was browsing this. You sound like you feel like arguing with the wind tonight or maybe just a troll. Can't tell.
May 30, 2014, 02:59:07 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
I am hearing them and dismissing them as overly paranoid.
You add the coin and make your money now -- and on the outside chance that the gov't comes a calling a year later after DRK has gone "mainstream" then you take the appropriate action.
Unless you are implying that the exchange is already doing something illegal and for that reason doesn't want attention.
DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence.
now you're starting to sound like a troll.
Yeah maybe I am wasting my time here...
May 30, 2014, 02:58:57 AM
DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence.
now you're starting to sound like a troll.
May 30, 2014, 02:57:18 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
Sounds like the government has you scared. If everyone thought like that nothing would get done.
OMG. Put it to rest. DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence. I'm talking strictly dumb business decision on Finex's part. Sorry if I hurt your DRK feelings.
May 30, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
Sounds like the government has you scared. If everyone thought like that nothing would get done.
May 30, 2014, 02:54:04 AM
I noticed bitfinex is french and I also remember a comment that said France would welcome Darkcoin. The french are always kind of odd lol
May 30, 2014, 02:51:44 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.
May 30, 2014, 02:44:37 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.
May 30, 2014, 02:42:07 AM
Ill take a tshirt too - awesome haha
May 30, 2014, 02:40:33 AM
make it twice.......
wha cant I snyc y
wha cant I snyc y
May 30, 2014, 02:39:59 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.
Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.
DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.
Politics = perception = reality.
May 30, 2014, 02:38:09 AM
and most still in bed...ouch
May 30, 2014, 02:36:50 AM
May 30, 2014, 02:36:31 AM
The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is
DRK
DRK
Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not
May 30, 2014, 02:36:18 AM
The fact that people will now have a way to buy DRK with fiat is pretty huge.
Jump to: