Just got a mention on local NPR.
Managed to record it on my phone if anyone is intersested.
https://mega.co.nz/#!aNFXUADQ!-P2isqiL5AA4tv1ZM_OvC2c_XpNTwsd8JwHWmDbKBko
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5727. (Read 9723748 times)
May 23, 2014, 02:51:58 PM
May 23, 2014, 02:46:45 PM
Masternode count rising nicely. 
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
Can you recommend an idiot's guide to setting up a node?
I have 1000 Drk waiting to go to work... also much less temptation to sell them if they are making Drk babies for me.
May 23, 2014, 02:44:35 PM
Masternode count rising nicely.
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
IMO there wi be at least 3x + what is now...if some weak hands didn't sell their 1000drk yet
May 23, 2014, 02:42:23 PM
Hi folks,
first of all...I like VTC AND DRK and I don`t quite get why people see the need to choose one and only one coin they like and "defend".
I just read this post on the VTC reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/2690jj/vertcoin_darkcoin/
I think the OP has a point here:
"Take darksend, and the soon-to-be-implemented SX Stealth Addresses. One is about anonymity, and the other is about Privacy.
An anonymous transaction in theory should be untraceable - from both ends. There is no way for someone at a later date based on the information in the blockchain and private keys of the addresses to discover what was sent or received from where. The regulatory and legal implications of this ability are mindblowing, but not very useful for all intents and purposes. They are however highly conducive for illicit usage, and consequently, favour such operations.
A private transaction by contrast is one where only the person who holds the private key can trace the transaction. To anyone else without this information, it is untraceable. The regulatory and legal implications of this by comparison are far more realistic. One can regulate, and also defend, provide sensitive disclosure of information, to the appropriate third parties - investigations can be done, and people can be held as complicit based on their actions. Of course people can choose to destroy their private key and with it the link is removed - however that is an implicit action on their part - and such actions have a legal basis for legislation, at least in modern society.
(ie "Why did you destroy your private key? As opposed to your private key is useless for us anyway")
What this means is that given the two options, a regulatory body would never choose the anonymous option. Given the two options, a business, an investor, a broker, and so forth - may like the idea of the anonymous option, but realise the message it sends - it opens them up to further scrutiny that is totally un-necessary and avoidable by the use of SX Addresses. Businesses can operate in private without people analysing the blockchain for their transactions, but at the same time, records can be kept or discovered if the business so chooses."
I am not interested in the price discussions he makes, as to me it seems to boil down to a false dilemma, where only one of the coins can survive.
I am more interested in the technical concept of "stealth adresses" and wether it is something you could possibly choose to do with DRK as well (just as darksend is optional, as far as I understand it).
Thx!
first of all...I like VTC AND DRK and I don`t quite get why people see the need to choose one and only one coin they like and "defend".
I just read this post on the VTC reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/2690jj/vertcoin_darkcoin/
I think the OP has a point here:
"Take darksend, and the soon-to-be-implemented SX Stealth Addresses. One is about anonymity, and the other is about Privacy.
An anonymous transaction in theory should be untraceable - from both ends. There is no way for someone at a later date based on the information in the blockchain and private keys of the addresses to discover what was sent or received from where. The regulatory and legal implications of this ability are mindblowing, but not very useful for all intents and purposes. They are however highly conducive for illicit usage, and consequently, favour such operations.
A private transaction by contrast is one where only the person who holds the private key can trace the transaction. To anyone else without this information, it is untraceable. The regulatory and legal implications of this by comparison are far more realistic. One can regulate, and also defend, provide sensitive disclosure of information, to the appropriate third parties - investigations can be done, and people can be held as complicit based on their actions. Of course people can choose to destroy their private key and with it the link is removed - however that is an implicit action on their part - and such actions have a legal basis for legislation, at least in modern society.
(ie "Why did you destroy your private key? As opposed to your private key is useless for us anyway")
What this means is that given the two options, a regulatory body would never choose the anonymous option. Given the two options, a business, an investor, a broker, and so forth - may like the idea of the anonymous option, but realise the message it sends - it opens them up to further scrutiny that is totally un-necessary and avoidable by the use of SX Addresses. Businesses can operate in private without people analysing the blockchain for their transactions, but at the same time, records can be kept or discovered if the business so chooses."
I am not interested in the price discussions he makes, as to me it seems to boil down to a false dilemma, where only one of the coins can survive.
I am more interested in the technical concept of "stealth adresses" and wether it is something you could possibly choose to do with DRK as well (just as darksend is optional, as far as I understand it).
Thx!
May 23, 2014, 02:36:03 PM
Masternode count rising nicely.
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
Even 1 DRK/day/node at current prices ~ £240/month/node
edit: think I may have just talked myself into setting up some more.
May 23, 2014, 02:24:41 PM
We all need privacy. We all need to ged rid of the big brother(government). Let them sorry for letting the people be connected via Internet and create a whole new world. Bitcoin is the only coin that should be massive accepted, but darkcoin could guarantee us the privacy that every human should deserve.
May 23, 2014, 02:13:44 PM
I promised myself not to spam with meme... but hey, I've been good all week. Every page read, F5 almost worn, time to relax.
May 23, 2014, 02:12:18 PM
holy shit some leet page count!
May 23, 2014, 02:11:39 PM
new price will be around 0.02000000
May 23, 2014, 02:08:54 PM
posted on page 1337
May 23, 2014, 02:05:35 PM
This coin will never become mainstream due to regulatory issues, sorry guys.
People said the same thing about Bitcoin, how it will be shut down by the government etc etc.. Phlease.
have you seen government or anybody taking down mp3 filesharing ode bittorrent???
you did not because they simply can not take it down... it is nothin one can take down...
this is the hole thing about crypto currencies... it belongs to the people an not to the government and that's forever
And then they turned off the internets...
May 23, 2014, 02:04:07 PM
DRK must conquer BTC-E and russian market will be captured
I think DRK shouldn't go to BTCE or have LTC/DRK pair in short term. It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
All the better. They'll have to buy DRK to hedge their LTC from the approaching "shark"
Yah but who will sell them DRK for LTC?
It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
you a right 100% miners on btc-e trollbox talking only about lite. If you don't know, users who are talking about coins that are not represented on the BTC-E get BAN immediately.
Very few talk anything positive. Most of them just cry Pump and Dump for last 5 days in a row. Buncha losing wankers not coming to terms with reality peddling their Shitcoin.
May 23, 2014, 02:02:59 PM
DRK must conquer BTC-E and russian market will be captured
xoтя я в пoлнoм шoкe нaxoжycь oт тoгo чтo oни дo cиx пop нe дoбaвили DRK.
Bpoдe тyт пиcaли чтo cкopo дoбaвят, лeнивыe кoзлы пoxoдy coвceм зaжpaлиcь... xoтя я в пoлнoм шoкe нaxoжycь oт тoгo чтo oни дo cиx пop нe дoбaвили DRK.
May 23, 2014, 02:01:42 PM
It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
you a right 100% miners on btc-e trollbox talking only about lite. If you don't know, users who are talking about coins that are not represented on the BTC-E get BAN immediately.
May 23, 2014, 01:57:59 PM
It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
you a right 100%
miners on btc-e trollbox talking only about lite. If you don't know, users who are talking about coins that are not represented on the BTC-E get BAN immediately.
May 23, 2014, 01:55:53 PM
DRK must conquer BTC-E and russian market will be captured
I think DRK shouldn't go to BTCE or have LTC/DRK pair in short term. It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
All the better. They'll have to buy DRK to hedge their LTC from the approaching "shark"
May 23, 2014, 01:48:42 PM
DRK must conquer BTC-E and russian market will be captured
I think DRK shouldn't go to BTCE or have LTC/DRK pair in short term. It is a Litecoin Bagholder's Association headquarters.
May 23, 2014, 01:35:51 PM
We know you read this thread Mr Atlas. Nice 
He should be referring to altcoins scrambling to make "a basic darksend" in a few days time so that they can get in the anonymous market. Cloners must be really pissed that they can't take darksend right now
May 23, 2014, 01:25:27 PM
Quote
This coin is going to unseat world governments I tell you! LOL
"Money is Power", or shall we say, "The Monopoly to Create Credit Money and charge interest is Absolute Power". (Alex James)
Amsel (Amschel) Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838:
"Let me issue and control a Nation's money and I care not who makes its laws".
In other words as the power of money shifts into the hands of the people, the established order of the world will fall just as many huge imperial empires before have fallen over the past millenia. We may see a dystopian situation arise due to this threat to the empire before it finally collapses. The Anglo/US Empire has had DOZENS of infinite FIAT printing fuelled wars over the past 100 years, with a current military presence in over 100 countries. In the past 100 years the US military has overthrown more than 50 governments. All this will end and become impossible to fund as the financial power of the empire collapses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joITmEr4SjY
Wow, you are seriously delusional. It is going to take more than a computer, an internet connection and cryptocurrency to unseat those in power. You kids might have to leave your basement for this one.
May 23, 2014, 01:24:56 PM
Can anyone else write to coinmarketcap to add DRK/CNY pair form bter (400000$ volume). I already write them, but no response.
Jump to: