Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6807. (Read 9723803 times)

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
This coin is nuts today, not sure if that was a misclick buy on c-cex or what...
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
I'm a little worried about what is going on:

Someone just bought at .00795 at c-cex.
That ridiculous unless someone is gaming the system.

still some more buys at .004 coming through too.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm a little worried about what is going on:

Someone just bought at .00795 at c-cex.
That ridiculous unless someone is gaming the system.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
NEED P2POOL SETTINGS

Please post the p2pool configuration needed to add
another node to the darkcoin p2pool....

need network.py settings

and also if any of the p2pool .py files need to be modded
for the X11 algo.

thanks.


Code:
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda nBits, height: __import__('darkcoin_subsidy').GetBlockBaseValue(nBits, height)

If SUBSIDY_FUNC has no problem, I will post it.
darkcoin_subsidy has no problem at testnet.
I am waiting a block, not by peer.





Code:
Commonly used SUBSIDY_FUNC has problem when peered. check pic 22-->20 when block changed(Skipping from block~~).
--------------------------------------
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 20*100000000 >> (height + 1)//210240,




newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Wow indeed no need to keep clicking on vote then. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 502
Holy market manipulation batman! I have to admit I have no clue whats going on today. Wow.

The poloniex insolvency theory seems the most plausible to me. That is most likely causing people to do crazy shit on poloneix. I would pay more attention to cex.

I doubt this.  Based on the troll-box at C-cex, some users have been having technical problems using Poloneix today.  I lost some BTC in the XCP hack, but Busoni is paying it back gradually, so far I have received 23%  of the BTC lost, and that was from 35 BTC, which the hacker left in his account. The rest is being raised by raising the fees on XCP to 2.5% and will be paid later, so although lots of BTC were withdrawn in the hack, the traders have not yet been paid back their lost BTC, so insolvency because of the hack is unlikely.

I should have just said hack instead of insolvency, even though you do admit they do not currently have the funds to pay back traders. Do you not agree that it could induce market volatility on poloniex?


Seems like a large dark holder invested in us on mintpal or something? We are now number one by far, someone paid 4 BTC to get us up there. Who was it?https://www.mintpal.com/voting

Nice!
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Seems like a large dark holder invested in us on mintpal or something? We are now number one by far, someone paid 4 BTC to get us up there. Who was it?https://www.mintpal.com/voting
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
could someone give me an example of their bat file command line?   is the look-up gap 2 needed btw? what's that for

okay i'm getting "calc compile failed" "creating kernel search error"

Have you tried this version? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
could someone give me an example of their bat file command line?   is the look-up gap 2 needed btw? what's that for

okay i'm getting "calc compile failed" "creating kernel search error"
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
my gpu is r9 270.


Having trouble getting sgminer to work.. it just pauses at start screen
first start takes a while... give it a min or 2
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
my gpu is r9 270.


Having trouble getting sgminer to work.. it just pauses at start screen
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
P2Pool in US still in beta and now working!  Cheesy

Please help testing and find some blocks to give us a good start!

http://p2pool.neocities.org/coin_drk.html

Pool fee 0% but donations are welcome!


Example: (GPU) sgminer -o http://67.233.200.130:23271 -u DRK_WALLET_ADDRESS -p 123

Example: (CPU) minerd -a X11 -o http://67.233.200.130:23271/ -u DRK_WALLET_ADDRESS -p 123
I have been on this pool for 10 hours but it still doesnt show me mining on the web stats
I am only seeing about 2% rejects on mt miners so i know everything is working on my end
Gonna switch back to the other US p2pool now, pleas let me know if you find the problem
My address is XvRs67Wnw1n1Kwtq4ihhTpv699DdJpxdnt
Thank you for trying!
I'm still waiting for that programmer to wake up in America.
If you install Bitmessage, you can probably help him more with this project than I can as I'm in France until thursday and can only restart my cloudminers until then, no remote controll over my GPU's yet..  Undecided



ok i found the problem on my end. i had +.01 appended to my address. apparently it didnt like that
i started a new address without the extra stuff and it seems to be working now (share difficulty seems really low....)
XjHEsKERYD2zvaxAA8F6DxWrEp3ZCWDHNc
hero member
Activity: 710
Merit: 500
Holy market manipulation batman! I have to admit I have no clue whats going on today. Wow.

The poloniex insolvency theory seems the most plausible to me. That is most likely causing people to do crazy shit on poloneix. I would pay more attention to cex.

I doubt this.  Based on the troll-box at C-cex, some users have been having technical problems using Poloneix today.  I lost some BTC in the XCP hack, but Busoni is paying it back gradually, so far I have received 23%  of the BTC lost, and that was from 35 BTC, which the hacker left in his account. The rest is being raised by raising the fees on XCP to 2.5% and will be paid later, so although lots of BTC were withdrawn in the hack, the traders have not yet been paid back their lost BTC, so insolvency because of the hack is unlikely.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
First, those look a lot like the digibyte logo, second, the digibyte logo is terrible, third.. well you get where I'm going with this

No problem, it was just a suggestion and nothing more. Thanks for your feedback Smiley
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Uhm... both currencies start with D, thats right. So should we rename this coin or just put the letter 'A' on the logo even when it has nothing to do with 'A' just to maintain 100% differency from the DigiCoin?
I can't see the risk of confusion in my coin design sorry.

Darkcoin already has great logo.

It's okay, but it dosen work as alogo its a virtual coin picture at the moment. For example go to http://coinmarketcap.com/ and compare the BTC and the DRK logo? While the DRK is a blurry mess because of the size, the BTC logo is still perfectly noticeable.

First, those look a lot like the digibyte logo, second, the digibyte logo is terrible, third.. well you get where I'm going with this
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0

Uhm... both currencies start with D, thats right. So should we rename this coin or just put the letter 'A' on the logo even when it has nothing to do with 'A' just to maintain 100% differency from the DigiCoin?
I can't see the risk of confusion in my coin design sorry.

Darkcoin already has great logo.

It's okay, but it dosen work as alogo its a virtual coin picture at the moment. For example go to http://coinmarketcap.com/ and compare the BTC and the DRK logo? While the DRK is a blurry mess because of the size, the BTC logo is still perfectly noticeable.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100

If you can play around and provide say 5-10 variations it would be nice Cheesy
Ai ai captain!  Grin



Please stop this nonsense! Here is why https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/digibytedgb-core-v61651-digishield-digispeed-segwit-408268
 Darkcoin already has great logo.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Did you see that buy up at c-cex also? Look at that candle reaching to 3 millibits
Jump to: