Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6908. (Read 9723475 times)
February 15, 2014, 05:47:12 PM
just bought some dark coins lets see how it goes
February 15, 2014, 05:44:54 PM
Same for me... Still not working... :
Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
calclCompile failedError: Creating kernel search failed!
Update your Catalyst drivers if you have some old version.
Run sgminer with --debug and show me the console output.
I'm getting the same error... Using 2x6990, latest drivers (13.350.1005.0).
Your not alone, same thing for me also
February 15, 2014, 05:09:47 PM
Got it compiled eventually... getting ~2Mh per R9 280x...
February 15, 2014, 05:09:33 PM
Anyone having issues with their cash-outs at lotterymining?
February 15, 2014, 04:59:22 PM
EDIT2 : Difficulty 108.43643556 
?? WTFFFF
?? WTFFFFThat's what you get when gpu miners start popping up.
Yes but Net Hash is only 1,5 Mh. I remember that with the whale it was > 2 M and we never rise this dificulty...
So the last modification they made with if diff >= 75 then I don't know what.. Should be take in account what should be the result of that modification???
Maybe I'll stop my rented instance NOw....
February 15, 2014, 04:58:07 PM
So now we got reward recalculated using new algorithm... Pity. GPUs are no good.
February 15, 2014, 04:56:04 PM
EDIT2 : Difficulty 108.43643556 ?? WTFFFF
?? WTFFFFThat's what you get when gpu miners start popping up.
February 15, 2014, 04:48:17 PM
So I publicly claim that 10% of my income goes to elmad. I'll try to do it daily. For as long as mining covers my expenses for server rent. I propose elmad himself to distribute this income over the people who take part in optimizations (specifically, ig0tik3d). I call upon those who want to see CPU mining alive to support this incentive. 5-10% is not much if you get performance increase of 20% or more. Even 0.5% would help. There are a many of us!
Let the CPU vs GPU battle begin!
Let the CPU vs GPU battle begin!
February 15, 2014, 04:29:08 PM
RE: New Windows CPU Miner
How's it going?
I'm working on it now....
How's it going?
Sorry, I give up for today. I asked now to ig0tik3d to release Windows binaries, because I had problems with configuring the right crosscompiling environment. I spent all day from a problem to another...
Anyway, for all people that wants CPU mining still alive... I think that there is a margin to improve the cpu miner. GPU miner for now I see that it's not so much more efficient, so I'll try to go more near to khs/W of the GPU miner.
Just, I dont mine because I have just an old notebook, so, if you are interested, a little encouragement can speed the work
2 persons, that I thanks very much, gave me a tip for this improved version of the cpu miner.
If you have more % revenue considers to bounty some % of the % to who works at this coin, of course to who you prefer, the Developer of the Coin, or the marketer, or the GPU miner developer, or the binaries releaser ect ect..
yeah let make the CPU still alive and improve it...
If you say that you only improved 1 of the 11 type and we already gain 20%.. I think we can continue cpu..
I'll give you tips with new version ( I've gor only 400 DRK so i'll not be so much ... jejeje)
EDIT : Difficulty 97.51495248
??EDIT2 : Difficulty 108.43643556
?? WTFFFF 
February 15, 2014, 04:09:25 PM
The public testing and improvement phase of the DarkSend technology officially begins right now!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
New rumor, eduffield is Satoshi... :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
The first rule about eduffield is that NO ONE talks about eduffield!
February 15, 2014, 03:28:05 PM
RE: New Windows CPU Miner
How's it going?
I'm working on it now....
How's it going?
Sorry, I give up for today. I asked now to ig0tik3d to release Windows binaries, because I had problems with configuring the right crosscompiling environment. I spent all day from a problem to another...
Anyway, for all people that wants CPU mining still alive... I think that there is a margin to improve the cpu miner. GPU miner for now I see that it's not so much more efficient, so I'll try to go more near to khs/W of the GPU miner.
Just, I dont mine because I have just an old notebook, so, if you are interested, a little encouragement can speed the work
2 persons, that I thanks very much, gave me a tip for this improved version of the cpu miner.
If you have more % revenue considers to bounty some % of the % to who works at this coin, of course to who you prefer, the Developer of the Coin, or the marketer, or the GPU miner developer, or the binaries releaser ect ect..
February 15, 2014, 03:15:32 PM
The public testing and improvement phase of the DarkSend technology officially begins right now!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
New rumor, eduffield is Satoshi... :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
The first rule about eduffield is that NO ONE talks about eduffield!
February 15, 2014, 03:14:36 PM
I dont get the argument of why people mining with gpus are more likely to sell them than those mining with cpus.
They aren't. But GPU mining is generally multiple times more profitable than CPU electricity cost wise. Also it's much easier to build a GPU farm than a CPU farm having an equal hashrate. People who mine with their own PC with a GPU probably will hold but GPU farm owners often take quick profits and sell their mined coins rightaway especially if the coin becomes popular and mining is profitable.
When the playing field is evened out, there isn't as much advantage to pump and dump.
Maybe, but before it evens out we may see a large price drop.
However, it can make your already mined coins more worth as now it will probably be priced for the increased hashrate/watt/dollar.
Worst thing that can happen is that factory miners will start mining hard and then drop it leaving us difficulty-locked
February 15, 2014, 03:12:27 PM
This is quite an ambiguous situation for investors. Should we sell now before GPU miners start to dump their coins and the price will go down? Or should we wait for the announcement of new feature test results when the price will probably increase? Which will come first? Haven't decided yet.
Aha! But maybe there are some of us who just like to be involved in a truly anonymous coin and we won't worry so much about some initial volatility in the coin.
I just want to see this work out into a truly anonymous coin.
That way I can unload all my coinye
February 15, 2014, 02:49:25 PM
The public testing and improvement phase of the DarkSend technology officially begins right now!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
New rumor, eduffield is Satoshi... :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
February 15, 2014, 02:41:06 PM
I'm personally a little disappointed since one of the two things that made DRK interesting for me as announced (CPU only) turned out to be false. But I'm not selling and will follow developers work.
But it's still resistant to multipools which is also a nice feature. February 15, 2014, 02:37:52 PM
I dont get the argument of why people mining with gpus are more likely to sell them than those mining with cpus.
They aren't. But GPU mining is generally multiple times more profitable than CPU electricity cost wise. Also it's much easier to build a GPU farm than a CPU farm having an equal hashrate. People who mine with their own PC with a GPU probably will hold but GPU farm owners often take quick profits and sell their mined coins rightaway especially if the coin becomes popular and mining is profitable.
When the playing field is evened out, there isn't as much advantage to pump and dump.
Maybe, but before it evens out we may see a large price drop.
February 15, 2014, 02:34:30 PM
This is quite an ambiguous situation for investors. Should we sell now before GPU miners start to dump their coins and the price will go down? Or should we wait for the announcement of new feature test results when the price will probably increase? Which will come first? Haven't decided yet.
I dont get the argument of why people mining with gpus are more likely to sell them than those mining with cpus.
It's a matter of volume. I was mining DRK with CPU, getting some 250-300 KH/s, around 12 DRK a day. Not thinking about selling because I really want to see the concept implemented, but with those rates, at current prices, the profit is small and less tempting to cash out. This perspective changes if you multiply the results by 5-10+ when using a decent GPU. Also the difficulty rises faster and CPU miners are slowly moved out of the picture.
I'm personally a little disappointed since one of the two things that made DRK interesting for me as announced (CPU only) turned out to be false. But I'm not selling and will follow developers work.
I agree. I kind of gave up on mining since the GPU release I noticed the amount of coins I was making drop quite a bit. I loved the fact that it was CPU only, but now it is just one of many GPU coins. But, I'm holding what I have.
February 15, 2014, 02:31:34 PM
The public testing and improvement phase of the DarkSend technology officially begins right now!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467857.new#new
February 15, 2014, 02:29:45 PM
This is quite an ambiguous situation for investors. Should we sell now before GPU miners start to dump their coins and the price will go down? Or should we wait for the announcement of new feature test results when the price will probably increase? Which will come first? Haven't decided yet.
I dont get the argument of why people mining with gpus are more likely to sell them than those mining with cpus.
It's a matter of volume. I was mining DRK with CPU, getting some 250-300 KH/s, around 12 DRK a day. Not thinking about selling because I really want to see the concept implemented, but with those rates, at current prices, the profit is small and less tempting to cash out. This perspective changes if you multiply the results by 5-10+ when using a decent GPU. Also the difficulty rises faster and CPU miners are slowly moved out of the picture.
I'm personally a little disappointed since one of the two things that made DRK interesting for me as announced (CPU only) turned out to be false. But I'm not selling and will follow developers work.
Jump to: