Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algorithm | BTC38.Com Traded | Launched in 2013 - page 10. (Read 23841 times)

newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Wondering why you have created a new thread about Digitalcoin. What happened to the old one?

The ANNs are still there. First one started by baritus (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anndgc-digitalcoin-multi-algo-masternodes-established-2013-209508), second by kenel (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dgc-digitalcoin-30-multi-algorithm-improved-blockchain-storage-released-785601), so hopefully this one will be permanent.
tyz
legendary
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1533
Wondering why you have created a new thread about Digitalcoin. What happened to the old one?
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 501
http://digitalcoin.org/
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 501
http://digitalcoin.org/
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced,

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.

Good intention but what is to prevent a foundation member to change the password before leaving?  Back to square one if that happen...


-tb-

Folks come and go and an ANN on a personal account can't be updated. This won't prevent intentional malicious intent, but as long as nobody has bad intentions this can be updated going forward.

Not sure if it's just my device, but it doesn't look like the screen shot to me. I see a very long skinny column of text.


don't know if talked already BUT

why not
1. publicly id the account holder(s)
2. publicly id 2-5 trustworthy people holding a password copy just in case something happens

cover all the bases / do it cryto style Cool

--------------
OP
"Confirmations average 40 seconds"

What is the block speed?
How many confirmations are needed?

scrypt-sha-x11 loop = 120sec?

you can put it in fine print at the bottom of the OP but full detail tech specs please Cheesy

Thanks for your input BitcoinNational.

Obviously teillagory is one of the account holders, and the other is myself, Tsquared. It is just the two of us at present as administration of the Digitalcoin Foundation is still in progress. Once complete, other Core Foundation members will also have access to this "Digitalcoin Foundation" bitcointalk account.

Thank you for your advice. We will add "Managed by user1, user2, user3" at the bottom of the ANN in order to provide full transparency.

I am not the most technical person, and maybe someone else can explain better, but block speed is 40 seconds average, and typically 6 confirmations are required. Blocks are created by each algorithm independently, not collectively, so I changed:

"Blocks are hashed using Scrypt, x11, and SHA256 algorithms."
To:
"Blocks are hashed using Scrypt, x11, or SHA256 algorithms."

But, only 3 consecutive blocks can be found using a single algorithm as described under "Algorithm Control", and difficulty is adjusted across all three algorithms simultaneously as each block is found. The only other coin to utilize this type of multi algorithm system, to my knowledge, is myriadcoin, and the result is a very consistent daily block rate (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgc/#!overview).

Any input as to how this can be explained better in the ANN would be greatly appreciated.

TT
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced,

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.

Good intention but what is to prevent a foundation member to change the password before leaving?  Back to square one if that happen...


-tb-

Folks come and go and an ANN on a personal account can't be updated. This won't prevent intentional malicious intent, but as long as nobody has bad intentions this can be updated going forward.

Not sure if it's just my device, but it doesn't look like the screen shot to me. I see a very long skinny column of text.


don't know if talked already BUT

why not
1. publicly id the account holder(s)
2. publicly id 2-5 trustworthy people holding a password copy just in case something happens

cover all the bases / do it cryto style Cool

--------------
OP
"Confirmations average 40 seconds"

What is the block speed?
How many confirmations are needed?

scrypt-sha-x11 loop = 120sec?

you can put it in fine print at the bottom of the OP but full detail tech specs please Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 501
http://digitalcoin.org/
Hi.
So how many coins will be in the Digitalcoin system?
In the previous version of this coin I remember the number of 200 million coins. This value is now changed?

Not sure we're absolutely certain, but the total supply should end up being around 48,166,000.

TT
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
Hi.
So how many coins will be in the Digitalcoin system?
In the previous version of this coin I remember the number of 200 million coins. This value is now changed?
legendary
Activity: 2424
Merit: 1148
Great to see the new thread, onwards and upwards
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced,

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.

Good intention but what is to prevent a foundation member to change the password before leaving?  Back to square one if that happen...


-tb-

Very well designed, just keep a few code copies on github (or any other site) & then you never have to go back to square one Cool

// Many other reasons why that's something missed in many of these applications over the years, seeing each & every change is a + for many reasons Cool

// Even copies of website code & other things are a professional way to keep backups Wink
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
Confirmed.  Good work...


-tb-
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
The problem is solved.

The new DGC layout is ok on Firefox Chrome and IE.  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1360
Merit: 506
Nice work! Yeah I'm getting the same on Chrome too. IE etc is ok.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
Is there going to be a welcome gift for this new currency? I remember Stellar giving out bonus for new users and it was pretty cool.


Digitalcoin is over 2 yr old but do come to #digitalcoin for your welcoming gift.  Smiley

https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#digitalcoin


-tb-
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Is there going to be a welcome gift for this new currency? I remember Stellar giving out bonus for new users and it was pretty cool.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Ok thank for your feedback.

I'll see what is the problem for google chrome. I hope to resolve this problem the next week but the layout may be change...

Teilla.

legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
I see the suppressed text column in Chrome but not IE or Firefox. 


-tb-
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 501
http://digitalcoin.org/
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced,

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.

Good intention but what is to prevent a foundation member to change the password before leaving?  Back to square one if that happen...


-tb-

Folks come and go and an ANN on a personal account can't be updated. This won't prevent intentional malicious intent, but as long as nobody has bad intentions this can be updated going forward.

Not sure if it's just my device, but it doesn't look like the screen shot to me. I see a very long skinny column of text.

TT

Edit: Thanks teillagory!!
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
You're right techbytes . There's a disadvantage ....

I thought this is a good idea but it's not ideal.

What is the best solution?

A private account or a common account...?

Whatever the solution chosen there is a degree of uncertainty and risk in the two cases.

However, we must minimize the risks.


legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced,

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.

Good intention but what is to prevent a foundation member to change the password before leaving?  Back to square one if that happen...


-tb-
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Good question bitcoin1387 and defaced.

Because the others threads are all created with a personnal account.
This account isn't a private account. It's the DGC foundation community account on BTC.

The menbers of the foundation have access to this account and it's that why a new thread is created.
Updates can be done even if people leave.
Pages:
Jump to: