Topic: [ANN][EAC] EarthCoin *SEEKING NEW EXCHANGES - HUGE VOLUMES BEING MISSED! - page 51. (Read 840344 times)

Quote from: systemfault on July 03, 2014, 06:55:53 AM

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Lol. Considering that Litecoin is offical dead on this forum this might be a good thing.

Well played!

I doubt how earthcoin can be revived... too old nothing new

A rebranch will help for sure, look at SUM2, i don't understand why it is not happening, is it so difficult to change it, more then a million dollar has been used to mine this one, i think that the dev team needs to have some more respect to the people that supported the coin and do the necessary steps to move this one up.

To create a new coin with same spec is easy, enhance it with other features easy too (such as PoW/PoS, X11/X13, with anon wallet etc), the problem is that it is virtually not possible to do a smooth "switchover", meaning at a given future time T, before T, everything runs as the current coin, and after that point, all runs at new spec. This is why, usually a smooth saving of an old coin is difficult, people prefer to create a new coin with better features.

In some case I see, dev (or new dev taking over) just create a new coin with improved spec, with same amount of coins, then swap it with old coins. This may involve a lot of work though, and has to deal with exchanges etc.

placebo

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dfox101 on July 03, 2014, 09:43:21 PM

Quote from: Biomech on July 03, 2014, 12:36:30 PM

Quote from: systemfault on July 03, 2014, 06:55:53 AM

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Lol. Considering that Litecoin is offical dead on this forum this might be a good thing.

Well played!

I doubt how earthcoin can be revived... too old nothing new

A rebranch will help for sure, look at SUM2, i don't understand why it is not happening, is it so difficult to change it, more then a million dollar has been used to mine this one, i think that the dev team needs to have some more respect to the people that supported the coin and do the necessary steps to move this one up.

dfox101

hero member

Activity: 551

Merit: 500

Quote from: Biomech on July 03, 2014, 12:36:30 PM

Quote from: systemfault on July 03, 2014, 06:55:53 AM

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Lol. Considering that Litecoin is offical dead on this forum this might be a good thing.

Well played!

I doubt how earthcoin can be revived... too old nothing new

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.

Quote from: systemfault on July 03, 2014, 06:55:53 AM

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Lol. Considering that Litecoin is offical dead on this forum this might be a good thing.

Well played!

shtako

hero member

Activity: 779

Merit: 502

Quote from: systemfault on July 03, 2014, 06:55:53 AM

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Lol. Considering that Litecoin is offical dead on this forum this might be a good thing.

systemfault

newbie

Activity: 62

Merit: 0

Earthcoin is "DEAD".

Good luck for another community..

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.

Quote from: centurion76 on July 02, 2014, 08:47:44 AM

FYI, we have a winner in the name Earthcoin's smallest denomination contest - he's been contacted to receive his EAC 700K.

The satoshi equivalent for EAC will be 'grain.' So 0.00000001 EAC = 1 Grain.

As you may know, a 'grain' was an ancient measurement, based on a grain of wheat, for denoting the smallest part of a troy ounce of gold and other systems for weighing gold.

I see your reason to invent the name for the smallest unit of Earthcoin. I see your reason not to use Satoshi for that. The only thing I can't understand is why you picked another coins name? Yes, this word is not registered tm or whatever, but it is already used by the Grain Coin longer than Earthcoin blockchain exist.

Yes, we know that. The community nominated that name, among others, and the community voted for this name; so we accepted it.

Graincoin is dead. Zero exchanges = market cap of 0. Not that it matter.

"Stop judging, so that you won't be judged"

Not judging anything and i really didn't mean to offend. I understand that it might seem a bit harsh if you are holding a bag of grain, but it is still facts. Anyway, sorry for offending you.

It does not matter do I hold or not hold Grain. What you would say if I name 0.000001 of Grain, say, one Earthy? Would it have any impact on Earthcoin or not - nobody knows. The same we may say about consequences of naming of 0.00000001EAC as one grain - nobody knows. But, both things are unethical, IMO.

Unethical? Do you even know the meaning of the word? We did not name the smallest denomination of EAC a "Graincoin," we called it a "Grain" as in a "grain of sand." It is a common English word and was in existence long before Graincoin. By your reasoning we couldn't call the smallest denomination a "Blue," as in "blue sky," because there is a coin called Bluecoin, or we couldn't call it a "Green," as in "green leaves," because you can find "Greencoin" in the game Super Mario Cart....

Unlike some others that are apologizing, I couldn't care less if you were offended - take your inane nitpicking to some other thread.

#ignore

Well put. Didn't realize I was coming across as apologetic until you posted this, but you're right.

So, to clarify. Shit happens, I ain't sorry, and I PERSONALLY like the choice.

centurion76

full member

Activity: 207

Merit: 100

Quote from: Biomech on July 02, 2014, 02:39:09 AM

FYI, we have a winner in the name Earthcoin's smallest denomination contest - he's been contacted to receive his EAC 700K.

The satoshi equivalent for EAC will be 'grain.' So 0.00000001 EAC = 1 Grain.

As you may know, a 'grain' was an ancient measurement, based on a grain of wheat, for denoting the smallest part of a troy ounce of gold and other systems for weighing gold.

I see your reason to invent the name for the smallest unit of Earthcoin. I see your reason not to use Satoshi for that. The only thing I can't understand is why you picked another coins name? Yes, this word is not registered tm or whatever, but it is already used by the Grain Coin longer than Earthcoin blockchain exist.

Yes, we know that. The community nominated that name, among others, and the community voted for this name; so we accepted it.

Graincoin is dead. Zero exchanges = market cap of 0. Not that it matter.

"Stop judging, so that you won't be judged"

Not judging anything and i really didn't mean to offend. I understand that it might seem a bit harsh if you are holding a bag of grain, but it is still facts. Anyway, sorry for offending you.

It does not matter do I hold or not hold Grain. What you would say if I name 0.000001 of Grain, say, one Earthy? Would it have any impact on Earthcoin or not - nobody knows. The same we may say about consequences of naming of 0.00000001EAC as one grain - nobody knows. But, both things are unethical, IMO.

Unethical? Do you even know the meaning of the word? We did not name the smallest denomination of EAC a "Graincoin," we called it a "Grain" as in a "grain of sand." It is a common English word and was in existence long before Graincoin. By your reasoning we couldn't call the smallest denomination a "Blue," as in "blue sky," because there is a coin called Bluecoin, or we couldn't call it a "Green," as in "green leaves," because you can find "Greencoin" in the game Super Mario Cart....

Unlike some others that are apologizing, I couldn't care less if you were offended - take your inane nitpicking to some other thread.

#ignore

bee7

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 523

FYI, we have a winner in the name Earthcoin's smallest denomination contest - he's been contacted to receive his EAC 700K.

The satoshi equivalent for EAC will be 'grain.' So 0.00000001 EAC = 1 Grain.

As you may know, a 'grain' was an ancient measurement, based on a grain of wheat, for denoting the smallest part of a troy ounce of gold and other systems for weighing gold.

I see your reason to invent the name for the smallest unit of Earthcoin. I see your reason not to use Satoshi for that. The only thing I can't understand is why you picked another coins name? Yes, this word is not registered tm or whatever, but it is already used by the Grain Coin longer than Earthcoin blockchain exist.

Yes, we know that. The community nominated that name, among others, and the community voted for this name; so we accepted it.

Graincoin is dead. Zero exchanges = market cap of 0. Not that it matter.

"Stop judging, so that you won't be judged"

Not judging anything and i really didn't mean to offend. I understand that it might seem a bit harsh if you are holding a bag of grain, but it is still facts. Anyway, sorry for offending you.

It does not matter do I hold or not hold Grain. What you would say if I name 0.000001 of Grain, say, one Earthy? Would it have any impact on Earthcoin or not - nobody knows. The same we may say about consequences of naming of 0.00000001EAC as one grain - nobody knows. But, both things are unethical, IMO.

For my part, I was unaware that there was a "grain coin". Not terribly surprised, but unaware. That being said, I think I was the only team member who actually liked "grain" as the winner Tongue

The vote wasn't rigged, or it would have been something else. It just came down that way. I'm pretty sure nobody on the team knew about "graincoin" prior to the contest being posted, though I can't speak for them.

I go with what's done is done. There was no malice nor ill intent. If it has a negative impact in some way, the community can simply refuse to use it. One way or the other, one participant now has significantly more than a grain of earthcoin Cheesy

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.