Topic: [ANN][EGC] EverGreenCoin | Environmental Green Causes | Full 7% PoS | Foundation - page 109. (Read 284543 times)

What a hell you say,

DEPOSIT XNG
Wallet status: Online (87491 blocks)
Your deposit address (ADDR)

EeRx8UjFfPbw8a6wYornzFsYa2Y4k72oEp      This is Enigma coin adress of Yobit. this is my Yobit XNG wallet


EHVZfzHzq3g64wprDFTf1HtmLDycTAqsdY     This is my PC XNG wallet, both are not EGC wallet, i can proof with screenshots !

Sorry to be the barrier of bad news, but both transactions did go to an EGC wallet. Both addresses you mention are valid EGC addresses and I can see your successful transactions on the block explorer to the mentioned addresses as you can see, EeRx8UjFfPbw8a6wYornzFsYa2Y4k72oEp and EHVZfzHzq3g64wprDFTf1HtmLDycTAqsdY

Transactions can not be canceled, reversed, or refunded in any way. Once you send someone EverGreenCoin, any crypto currency for that matter, they are sent and can not be unsent. I have no control over other people's wallets. In the same way I can not take coins out of your wallet, I can not take coins out of the wallet(s) you sent these transactions to.

It is not possible to send EGC to another coin's wallet. You can only send EGC to an EGC wallet. Which is what you have done here in both instances. Had the address you tried to send to not been a valid EGC address, the EGC wallet would have prevented you.

These two addresses only have the one transaction each. What that says is the addresses have not been in use, up until you sent coins to them. Unfortunately, that lessens the likelihood of being able to determine the owner(s) of these addresses, if the addresses even have an owner.

Unless someone comes forward with your mistakenly sent coins, there is really nothing that can be done. This is no fault of mine or EverGreenCoin. This is how crypto currencies work. I am so sorry to say, there is nothing I or anyone else, besides the owner of the addresses, can do to help you recover the coins you mistakenly transferred.

Both transactions went to Enigma (XNG coin) wallet please fix it Devs total bad day for me

This is the wallet adress where should my EGC come back ->EWpK3TRzBzvNoEuekcq7gxevWfWU5372e5

Wtf with me today, 1 more failed transaction jesus

Status: 7/unconfirmed, broadcast through 10 nodes
Date: 14/07/2016 16:31
To: EeRx8UjFfPbw8a6wYornzFsYa2Y4k72oEp
Debit: -5000.00 EGC
Transaction fee: -0.0001 EGC
Net amount: -5000.0001 EGC
Transaction ID: 13236137b9a8e1498d47057732b2ce35b6dc19172e7ad48edebba0386a5e9bcb

Status: 85 confirmations, broadcast through 14 nodes
Date: 14/07/2016 14:51
To: EHVZfzHzq3g64wprDFTf1HtmLDycTAqsdY
Debit: -1000.00 EGC
Transaction fee: -0.0001 EGC
Net amount: -1000.0001 EGC
Transaction ID: e6a2e0ff6ea7320a3d3b1cd316367ae1c3b4cb098ffa105d3b7a0fa65b8b9580

Can you cancel this transaction, it is not Evergreen adress, it is XNG coin adress, how could that been proccessed lol.

I am working on EGC lite now. There is actually a lot of functions and even a few header and source files I can trim out completely now with PoW over. I think this will be a good idea regardless of what device is chosen for the solar miner. That said, the planned android wallet and desktop wallets could benefit from this trimming. With that in mind, perhaps it is a new version I am working on, not "EGC lite." I am excited to see how big of an impact on resources this will have.

Yes, importing the blockchain is intensive. Snapshotting is much faster. There is a recent snapshot in the OP should anyone need it. (Thanks again CryptoChainer!)

Yes, a package is what we will certainly want when we are cranking these out on a production level.

If you do find time to test on your CHIP, I would greatly appreciate it. If you do or whenever you can, please share your results. At this time, I personally only have a Pi emulator to experiment with.

Many thanks!

P.S. Community > Dev

For those that are interested, the EGC part starts at 59:40

Btw EGC just passed 20 btc volume at Bittrex   

Having a cutdown daemon could be interesting, I've been running the daemon (without QT) on my Pi and that seems to have been working ok (although a bit slow at importing the block chain), htop seems to suggest it's using around 26% of the available 1G of ram so there's some hope it might fit on a smaller device.

Compilation we might be able to fix by cross compiling and creating a package, then it's just a case of installing the binaries, the packaging side is something I wanted to look at anyway on the Pi so I can easily install it on another Pi without having to install the whole dev environment.

I might see if I can at least get it compiling on my C.H.I.P later today.

Wow, they got back to me quick!  

I do believe so. A community member actually made the campaign, they might know better. But, according to what I find in the teespring EU FAQ, they will ship there regardless of how the campaign was setup. You should have had to pay for international shipping.

I have emailed teespring asking for verification. I will post and PM you just as soon as I get a response.

Thanks for the order!

Reserved Blue tshirt,send to poland?

Many thanks, fellow Steve!

EDIT: This has been added to the OP.

EverGreenCoin blockchain has been updated at CryptoChainer.com for instant sync.  If you grab this blockchain snapshot, your wallet will be synchronized up to 7/13/16 with no importing blocks.

Thanks for the input guys! Glad to see you stuck around LeChuck!

A lite version of the daemon could be made for this purpose, removing some of the unnecessary code. PoW mining code for example. I can begin looking into this.

My personal vision of the solar miner has always been a daemon, 'command line' as called, with a web interface. Keeping the cost down with no display, which would be almost useless for an outdoor application, and removing the unnecessary overhead of the Qt and supporting environment in my mind makes this an obvious approach.

My initial reaction is I like how the Pine64's name fits with EverGreenCoin. Of course, power consumption is a much greater concern. Making the C.H.I.P. more fitting, plus the lower cost. But, as mentioned, it being able to compile and run the daemon, even a lite version, remains to be seen. Some testing will have to be done.

I have asked Gabi to chime in here. Again, thanks for the input everyone.

EDIT: Ordered my C.H.I.P. to experiment with.

https://youtu.be/v-jvXkYy3Fo

EverGreenCoin is being mentioned on Coinigy's investment strategy live stream!

Replying to a few posts in one.


If that's based on http://wiki.pine64.org/images/1/1d/Power_Consumption.jpg someone needs to learn maths, 5.1*0.53 is not 2.5, there's also no comment on what the SBC is doing (I'd suspect that's idling).


Both the Pine64 and the Pi3 run the A53 CPU core at the same speed that would mean their performance is likely to be equivalent. The Pine64 may be able to run fully 64 bit, the Pi3 currently cannot but it' not clear if that will make any difference in performance, the reports I've seen so far suggest that 64bit arm linux is still buggy, 64bit will also lead to larger pointers and some variable sizes which will lead to the same code needing more memory.

No Raspberry Pi uses 12W, the Pi3 suggests a ~12W PSU however at least half that capacity is to allow for USB peripherals meaning the Pi3 needs around 6W for the SBC. There is even evidence that the Pi3 needs just over 1W at idle and under 4W full load (http://raspi.tv/2016/how-much-power-does-raspberry-pi3b-use-how-fast-is-it-compared-to-pi2b). Based on my experience I think full load on the Pi3 is a bit higher (nearer 6W) however I've not seen any of the older Pi models need over 5W for full load.

As above, no it doesnt! Most of the pi models are 5W max, the Pi3 is 6-7W max for the SBC.

and as a useful quote from the Pine64 FAQ (http://www.pine64.com/faq-pine-64#toggle-id-20)
So they also suggest a 2A PSU for the board + 2x USB devices, compared to the Pi3's 2.5A PSU for board + 4x USB devices. That would suggest they're power requirement are fairly similar.

The one advantage the Pine64 does have over most other boards is the option to have 2GB of ram.

After all that the SBC I'm interested in trying out with the EGC wallet is the C.H.I.P. this is a $9 board that includes eMMC storage, lipo charger, and wifi and 0.5-1W power draw. The potential issues are only 512MB or ram and single core SOC, this is likely to make compiling the wallet more challenging, and my make running it difficult as well. If it works its literally a case of plug in power and go (everything else you need is included on a $9 board).

Muhahaha!


Im sure a certain someone is pretty sad he dumped a ton of coins to us for 150 sat or.. was it less, a while ago.

Thanks again <3

1277 now, need 5BTC to 2k, go evergreen

Lets hope it will get more people into the EGC community.

Hope volume will keep growing...
Now just 11 BTC volume