Topic: [ANN][ENRG]Energycoin - Android Released - Bittrex - - page 14. (Read 334702 times)

Quote from: GQM on January 18, 2015, 12:27:30 PM

Hi ranlo,

Are you looking for hosting space for your miners?

I'm not a miner, but he was saying that he'll have to see if he can afford it. I am an investor,

.

What Avenue of mining are you looking to invest into? If you'd like to discuss further contact me through PM and we can chat over Skype or phone.

Thanks,
Ryan Scott

P.S. here is an interview I did recently

Decentral Talk Live. Ep#22: Ryan Scott of Knights…: http://youtu.be/bOqPzDfamIo

I wouldn't invest in mining itself, as it's a losing game. There are far too many variables there, and it's a high-risk low-reward proposition (which is why so many companies turn to cloud mining). I'd be looking more towards investing in the data center itself.

Just figured I'd toss it out there since you were looking into whether or not the location could be afforded. If not, knowing how much you're short (or otherwise would need) would go a long way towards running numbers and evaluating things.

Thank you for your interest we are already funded, we were looking at the cost effectiveness of the DC not whether we could afford it.

Keep in mind the reason most peopke buy into cloud mining is the cheaper hosting costs. We are going to be offering those cheaper hosting options to regular miners so they can choose between owning the equipment themselves or buying into our cloud mining services.

Got ya. I was going based on this quote:

"I'm in Manitoba right now looking at that new 2.5 MW facility and see[ing] if we can afford it."

In any case, good luck with everything!

. Anything that helps with ENRG is awesome.

crypto4jan

legendary

Activity: 2453

Merit: 1026

Energy coin master

My experience is mostly with POW coins. The POS issue does make sense with regards to inputs.

Learned something new today

Hi Ryan you mean BLOCK inputs?

Here the unmature blockes of my fresch EnergyCoin Foundation wallet:

And here the splited blockes after the first stake:

I hope we can coded it that blockes automatic merge after stake if they are below a thresshold.

GQM

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

My experience is mostly with POW coins. The POS issue does make sense with regards to inputs.

Learned something new today

GQM

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Quote from: ranlo on January 18, 2015, 01:42:46 AM

Quote from: GQM on January 17, 2015, 06:27:48 PM

Quote from: crypto4jan on January 18, 2015, 02:33:51 AM

Hi ranlo,

Are you looking for hosting space for your miners?

I'm not a miner, but he was saying that he'll have to see if he can afford it. I am an investor,

.

What Avenue of mining are you looking to invest into? If you'd like to discuss further contact me through PM and we can chat over Skype or phone.

Thanks,
Ryan Scott

P.S. here is an interview I did recently

Decentral Talk Live. Ep#22: Ryan Scott of Knights…: http://youtu.be/bOqPzDfamIo

I wouldn't invest in mining itself, as it's a losing game. There are far too many variables there, and it's a high-risk low-reward proposition (which is why so many companies turn to cloud mining). I'd be looking more towards investing in the data center itself.

Just figured I'd toss it out there since you were looking into whether or not the location could be afforded. If not, knowing how much you're short (or otherwise would need) would go a long way towards running numbers and evaluating things.

Thank you for your interest we are already funded, we were looking at the cost effectiveness of the DC not whether we could afford it.

Keep in mind the reason most peopke buy into cloud mining is the cheaper hosting costs. We are going to be offering those cheaper hosting options to regular miners so they can choose between owning the equipment themselves or buying into our cloud mining services.

platinumjsi

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

Quote from: platinumjsi on January 17, 2015, 05:09:53 PM

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Might have too many small inputs which would cause the size of the transaction your trying to send to possibly be to large for the max block size.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimating-transaction-size-in-bytes-124302

Not sure if this is the exact same way to calculate for ENRG but most likely very similar.

If you stake EnergyCoin in a wallet with much coins 1M or more yuo can see with coin controll there are very much small blocks.
When there is an update I like to have the console comando setstakesplitthreshold . The latest wallet from HyperStake introduced this and it prevenst blocks to spli and I think it then also prevents error "Transaction creation failed". I shall discuss this with the developer. I had yesterday a long Skype conversation for improvement of the wallet and other topics.

btw there was a nice rally yesterday on Bittrex!

Ok yea I have half a mill coins and its staking multiple times a min its crazy.

And yea hope to have made a few more coins from yesterday

crypto4jan

legendary

Activity: 2453

Merit: 1026

Energy coin master

Quote from: ranlo on January 18, 2015, 04:06:50 AM

Quote from: crypto4jan on January 18, 2015, 04:00:32 AM

Quote from: ranlo on January 18, 2015, 02:56:11 AM

....

I think another cool feature, and one that would be unique, would be something along the lines of automatic merging of inputs without affecting the staking ability. To illustrate the idea:

1) I send my wallet 100 ENRG
2) It stakes and is now 50/50
3) As soon as the stake above is confirmed, the wallet will automatically merge them into a new input for the wallet, such that I now have the 50+50+stake=1 input again

This would cut down on the constant splitting without the user having to do anything, and would minimize the effects on the staking ability (if we manually craft new transactions with coin control, we're losing a lot of coin days).

The console comando setstakesplitthreshold does what you want.
Maybe good to build in a standard thressholt that can be altered if needed.
By HyperStake I saw blocked splitting after stake and there it is important to choice the right size. HYP is mature in 9 days and gets weight and with more weight more chance to stake the maximum stake of 1000 HYP in 30 days. The optimum block size is for HYP is 1600 and then it hits the max 1000 reward in 30 days but with inflation controll you have to make the blockes now biger to get more weight. The stake for Hyperstake is a kind of lottery and the more weight you have the more chance on the stake.

Ok for EnergyCoin we not have to tweak for staking but preventing of splitting blockes into to much small blockes.
For big wallets it would be great to be able ajust setstakesplitthreshold and for small wallets 100 ENRG as standard merge value is suitable.

Having a hardcoded value would be good. And then add in the ability to change it in the GUI (such as how you can change your fees per kb without using commands, just using the GUI options).

Ok for the new wallet we put this on the list.
Thank you for discuss this here to make it more clear for EnergyCR to coded this later.

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: crypto4jan on January 18, 2015, 04:00:32 AM

Quote from: ranlo on January 18, 2015, 02:56:11 AM

....

I think another cool feature, and one that would be unique, would be something along the lines of automatic merging of inputs without affecting the staking ability. To illustrate the idea:

1) I send my wallet 100 ENRG
2) It stakes and is now 50/50
3) As soon as the stake above is confirmed, the wallet will automatically merge them into a new input for the wallet, such that I now have the 50+50+stake=1 input again

This would cut down on the constant splitting without the user having to do anything, and would minimize the effects on the staking ability (if we manually craft new transactions with coin control, we're losing a lot of coin days).

The console comando setstakesplitthreshold does what you want.
Maybe good to build in a standard thressholt that can be altered if needed.
By HyperStake I saw blocked splitting after stake and there it is important to choice the right size. HYP is mature in 9 days and gets weight and with more weight more chance to stake the maximum stake of 1000 HYP in 30 days. The optimum block size is for HYP is 1600 and then it hits the max 1000 reward in 30 days but with inflation controll you have to make the blockes now biger to get more weight. The stake for Hyperstake is a kind of lottery and the more weight you have the more chance on the stake.

Ok for EnergyCoin we not have to tweak for staking but preventing of splitting blockes into to much small blockes.
For big wallets it would be great to be able ajust setstakesplitthreshold and for small wallets 100 ENRG as standard merge value is suitable.

Having a hardcoded value would be good. And then add in the ability to change it in the GUI (such as how you can change your fees per kb without using commands, just using the GUI options).

crypto4jan

legendary

Activity: 2453

Merit: 1026

Energy coin master

Quote from: ranlo on January 18, 2015, 02:56:11 AM

....

I think another cool feature, and one that would be unique, would be something along the lines of automatic merging of inputs without affecting the staking ability. To illustrate the idea:

1) I send my wallet 100 ENRG
2) It stakes and is now 50/50
3) As soon as the stake above is confirmed, the wallet will automatically merge them into a new input for the wallet, such that I now have the 50+50+stake=1 input again

This would cut down on the constant splitting without the user having to do anything, and would minimize the effects on the staking ability (if we manually craft new transactions with coin control, we're losing a lot of coin days).

The console comando setstakesplitthreshold does what you want.
Maybe good to build in a standard thressholt that can be altered if needed.
By HyperStake I saw blocked splitting after stake and there it is important to choice the right size. HYP is mature in 9 days and gets weight and with more weight more chance to stake the maximum stake of 1000 HYP in 30 days. The optimum block size is for HYP is 1600 and then it hits the max 1000 reward in 30 days but with inflation controll you have to make the blockes now biger to get more weight. The stake for Hyperstake is a kind of lottery and the more weight you have the more chance on the stake.

Ok for EnergyCoin we not have to tweak for staking but preventing of splitting blockes into to much small blockes.
For big wallets it would be great to be able ajust setstakesplitthreshold and for small wallets 100 ENRG as standard merge value is suitable.

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Lovethecoins on January 18, 2015, 02:39:50 AM

Quote from: crypto4jan on January 18, 2015, 02:33:51 AM

Quote from: platinumjsi on January 17, 2015, 05:09:53 PM

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Might have too many small inputs which would cause the size of the transaction your trying to send to possibly be to large for the max block size.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimating-transaction-size-in-bytes-124302

Not sure if this is the exact same way to calculate for ENRG but most likely very similar.

If you stake EnergyCoin in a wallet with much coins 1M or more yuo can see with coin controll there are very much small blocks.
When there is an update I like to have the console comando setstakesplitthreshold . The latest wallet from HyperStake introduced this and it prevenst blocks to spli and I think it then also prevents error "Transaction creation failed". I shall discuss this with the developer. I had yesterday a long Skype conversation for improvement of the wallet and other topics.

btw there was a nice rally yesterday on Bittrex!

Thanks for the update!

It sure was I hope we see another one!

I think another cool feature, and one that would be unique, would be something along the lines of automatic merging of inputs without affecting the staking ability. To illustrate the idea:

1) I send my wallet 100 ENRG
2) It stakes and is now 50/50
3) As soon as the stake above is confirmed, the wallet will automatically merge them into a new input for the wallet, such that I now have the 50+50+stake=1 input again

This would cut down on the constant splitting without the user having to do anything, and would minimize the effects on the staking ability (if we manually craft new transactions with coin control, we're losing a lot of coin days).

Lovethecoins

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: crypto4jan on January 18, 2015, 02:33:51 AM

Quote from: platinumjsi on January 17, 2015, 05:09:53 PM

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Might have too many small inputs which would cause the size of the transaction your trying to send to possibly be to large for the max block size.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimating-transaction-size-in-bytes-124302

Not sure if this is the exact same way to calculate for ENRG but most likely very similar.

If you stake EnergyCoin in a wallet with much coins 1M or more yuo can see with coin controll there are very much small blocks.
When there is an update I like to have the console comando setstakesplitthreshold . The latest wallet from HyperStake introduced this and it prevenst blocks to spli and I think it then also prevents error "Transaction creation failed". I shall discuss this with the developer. I had yesterday a long Skype conversation for improvement of the wallet and other topics.

btw there was a nice rally yesterday on Bittrex!

Thanks for the update!

It sure was I hope we see another one!

crypto4jan

legendary

Activity: 2453

Merit: 1026

Energy coin master

Quote from: platinumjsi on January 17, 2015, 05:09:53 PM

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Might have too many small inputs which would cause the size of the transaction your trying to send to possibly be to large for the max block size.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimating-transaction-size-in-bytes-124302

Not sure if this is the exact same way to calculate for ENRG but most likely very similar.

If you stake EnergyCoin in a wallet with much coins 1M or more yuo can see with coin controll there are very much small blocks.
When there is an update I like to have the console comando setstakesplitthreshold . The latest wallet from HyperStake introduced this and it prevenst blocks to spli and I think it then also prevents error "Transaction creation failed". I shall discuss this with the developer. I had yesterday a long Skype conversation for improvement of the wallet and other topics.

btw there was a nice rally yesterday on Bittrex!

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: GQM on January 17, 2015, 06:27:48 PM

Quote from: platinumjsi on January 17, 2015, 05:09:53 PM

Hi ranlo,

Are you looking for hosting space for your miners?

I'm not a miner, but he was saying that he'll have to see if he can afford it. I am an investor,

.

What Avenue of mining are you looking to invest into? If you'd like to discuss further contact me through PM and we can chat over Skype or phone.

Thanks,
Ryan Scott

P.S. here is an interview I did recently

Decentral Talk Live. Ep#22: Ryan Scott of Knights…: http://youtu.be/bOqPzDfamIo

I wouldn't invest in mining itself, as it's a losing game. There are far too many variables there, and it's a high-risk low-reward proposition (which is why so many companies turn to cloud mining). I'd be looking more towards investing in the data center itself.

Just figured I'd toss it out there since you were looking into whether or not the location could be afforded. If not, knowing how much you're short (or otherwise would need) would go a long way towards running numbers and evaluating things.

GQM

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Might have too many small inputs which would cause the size of the transaction your trying to send to possibly be to large for the max block size.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/estimating-transaction-size-in-bytes-124302

Not sure if this is the exact same way to calculate for ENRG but most likely very similar.

GQM

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Hi ranlo,

Are you looking for hosting space for your miners?

I'm not a miner, but he was saying that he'll have to see if he can afford it. I am an investor,

.

What Avenue of mining are you looking to invest into? If you'd like to discuss further contact me through PM and we can chat over Skype or phone.

Thanks,
Ryan Scott

P.S. here is an interview I did recently

Decentral Talk Live. Ep#22: Ryan Scott of Knights…: http://youtu.be/bOqPzDfamIo

platinumjsi

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

Alright guys, having a little problem with the Windows client, it wont let me send large transactions, I keep getting "Transaction creation failed" I can send smaller ones but over time the size I can send without error is shrinking, any idea how I can fix this?

Lovethecoins

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Hi ranlo,

Are you looking for hosting space for your miners?

I'm not a miner, but he was saying that he'll have to see if he can afford it. I am an investor,

.

Wise choice of investment! great volume today no sellers also

Looks good!

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007