Topic: [ANN][ERC] EuropeCoin - ONLY PURE PoS - NEXT TO FORK!!! - BITTREX - ShareXcoin - page 50. (Read 123991 times)

EUROPECOIN TEAM WANTS TO MAKE A LITTLE TRIBUTE TO ONE OF THE BEST BRAINS OF THE 20TH CENTURY:



http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/13/alien-artist-hr-giger-dies


WE'LL MISS YOUR GENIUS!

I think yes instead, sir.


Why of course? You say later on you post that someone could think that he could be accorded with us to blahblah.... Why there did you said "of course" : of course means that a thing is SURE, and with NO DOUBT about. Then why have you wrote: 


...at least try to be coherent with yourself.

Then, what are you talking about here:

We didn't halved the payout for early investors, just for late investors AND THIS WAS SPECIFIED WITH CAPITAL LETTERS IN THE IPO THREAD. BUT MAYBE CAPITAL LETTERS DOESN'T MEAN IMPORTANCE TO A SENTENCE TO YOU. So you maybe skipped that point, in the hurry or i dunnow...

Morever you're really saying bul**hit. You know why? because frist of all we reduced the total amount of coins before launch and from this action EARLY INVESTORS GAINED ONLY!  Why? it's very simple (at least for a normal QI): you have the same amount of coins but the total amount that could be produced it's 2x times less than the original one. SO investors who got their quotes early, when total amount were fixed at 741M, found themselves With a 2x MORE VALUED INVESTMENT SINCE THE TOTAL CAP AMOUNT WAS REDUCED BY 2X to 384M .

Also late investors, THAT WE SPECIFIED AT CAPITAL LETTERS THAT WOULD HAD RECEIVED HALF OF THE QUOTES TO NOT PENALIZE THE EARLY ONES (as it seems right to me, and to everybody our there but you), gained from the reduction of the total cap.
But i got what kind of person you are No prob. I will answer to ya for the infinite time of this world 'till electricity and the net will be alive, no problem for me

I've seen your behaviour from the start.

In the ipo thread there was a request, very clear and polite to RESPECT THE LAYOUT OF THE THREAD WITHOUT POSTING ANYTHING BUT THE IPO APPLICATIONS. THIS MEANS NO QUESTION ABOUT IT, OR AT LEAST YOU COULD POST YOUR QUESTION , BUT THEN DON'T BE ANGRY IF IT'S BEEN DELETED. I've self moderated that topic just to avoid spamming and trolling (as you perfectly did) WHEN I ASKED IN THE IPO OP TO NOT WRITE ANYTHING ELSE THAN IPO APPLICATIONS POST.

YOU'VE BEEN THE FIRST TO WRITE A NON APPLICATION POST ON IPO THREAD.

You've been warned one, two, three times. Then i've deleted your post.

As you can see i've not self moderated this thread because this is THE COMMUNITY THREAD. Self moderating a community is a dictatorial shit. Avoiding spamming of a thread and a project it is not so.
I want to hear the voice of the community, but there i can just hear you , with so much frustration in your words (for something that obviously doesn't have to deal with us).

You are a showman! you want, research and NEEDS the lights on you. And you're doing very well in your task.
I really don't understand your schizophrenic behave: first you come to say we're scammers when just posted the ann. Then criticized our escrow and blah blah, our system of quotes that was so stupid and more

Then you bought a quote.

Then you've received your payout and took it. I don't see any incoming tx from your address in my wallet so...i think you took it.

But after it's 2 fuc**ing days that you're CONTINUING TALKING ABOUT NOTHING!

I wait for your reply asap.



So much time to write on the forum today!



ps. for the real supporters here's some stats!

 #BTC-#ERC EuropeCoin  13.34189332BTC 24h Volume   
10.6% UPTREND!
Last 0.00000190 
High 0.00000304 
Low 0.00000170

It's the Final Countdown!

i'd like to receive airdrop.

thank you

I don't think you understood completely what I was trying to convey. I'm not saying you are untrustworthy or that you did not give the refund for those who requested. Of course you did. I'm not saying you changed the rules either. I'm saying the dev changed the rules and you did not announce that since the rules are changed, the old rule is invalidated. The old rule here is that refunds will not be given once the coin is launched. The dev changed the rules by deciding to delay the payout after the launch... see where I'm getting at?

Imagine this scenario: If you were asked to be an escrow for Xcoin and the IPO was like for every .1 BTC paid by investor,  200 Xcoins would be given in return. So the investors filled in and some BTC was collected by you. Now Imagine after the coin launched, the dev decided to announce that he feels that 200 would be unfair and reduce the 200 Xcoin to 130 Xcoin for every .1 BTC. It would be ridiculous of you to NOT announce that since the reward system has changed, the original investors can rethink their investment and those that wish to withdraw from the IPO can do so. Ideally this would be in big bold letters on the OP as well as in your comments and announcements and it would not matter that the coin has already launched.

It is not any different at all in the case of announcing after launch that there will be an intentional delay of closing the IPO and the subsequent giving out of the ERC coins. The investors had a right to withdraw their investments. But no announcement was made on the OP or by you that they could. In fact the rules still read the standard "Refund available if the coin does not launch". I can understand that nonsense of a dev not too keen on announcing the availability of refunds... he would lose money after all. But as the escrow, I fail to understand your lack of neutrality by not announcing in big red letters that refunds are available to any investor even though the coin is launched.

If I were to be blunt, I would say it looked like you were (unintentionally) cooperating with that fellow in screwing over the investors. Technically you are right.... you did your job by handing out the coins to the investors after launch. The line gets blurred here because when something as obvious as this happens, you need to take a stand and are expected to be neutral. And I can say with a fair amount of certainty that not a single investor in this venture will be able to vouch for your being neutral.

Yep sounds good ! thanks for clearing that up, I sent a request as well now that I have updated my signature.

And you are?

Think before talking