Topic: [ANN][exchange] alcurex v2.0.1 - page 62. (Read 152677 times)

Just my two cents:

We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....

Thank you halibit, that really is a great news.

About the new coins, why don't we just wait for them to mature? for example, Auroracoin has to distribute the 50% 1st before we add them. For Particlecoin, they need to release their final version of their wallet before adding them.

There are several exchanges out there that is like cryptsy trading all the altcoins. Having a lot of competition is hard. If we focus on the top 5 coins, our main competition would be this: https://holytransaction.com/ - they are aiming to be like coinbase. I think we should try futures for lump sum speculation, or atleast options.

I would like to request 2 features on the exchange, deposit via private key and a built in paper wallet for cold storage.

and 0 km from halibit's home 

Only 600 km from my home:)

I have an idea for a solution to the listing coins problem:

How about if the exchange has 2 sections, one for known stable good cryptos and another section for speculators/high risk investors.

The stable section could offer direct fiat to crypto transactions.  Once the user uses the stable side to buy into crypto, now the user will have the option of using his newly obtained crypto to gamble on the speculator/high risk side or sit on his crypto.

This would elminate the issues of "how do I buy BTC/LTC/DOGE/etc?" and "where can I buy one of the new coins with this BTC/LTC/etc I just bought?"

We create stability and high quality by offering 2 services in one and making it easier for anyone to get in on the action.

I know I had a hard time getting into crypto at first because I had to go through coinbase or ebay to buy BTC and then I had to figure out how to exchange it for other coins.

The reason we need the stable coin side is because this will be the service that stays stable relatively to the value of fiat.

The other side of speculation/high risk is just a convenience for people so they don't have to create a million other accounts with other exchanges.

The speculation/high risk side can continuously be updated by the community vote and decide how many new coins should be listed, but we should have a cap of maybe just 25 of the top new coins on this side so we're not flooded with a ton of crapcoins and just choose the best looking ones for the users.

We could even have a small wiki of each new coin listed to get the research done for the user, this will make it easier for the user to decide if they want to gamble on the speculation/high risk side.

Add Bellscoin please!

Add AIRcoin please!

i just saw that there is an unreleased vote on six coins, over at CS.
I like where this is going guys, keep it up!

+1

One more step in the right direction with company registration done  

Are there any infos when bounties will return and what will be done about further marketing of alcurex / microcoin.

Noone can.
The issuer of the listing at cryptostocks has a list with all the shareholders at CS who chose to disclose their email.
That;s just about it.
I suppose that the vote will either be at CS, or better yet, onsite at alcurex.

I certainly hope there is no vote for this on this board, as this will definitely lead to excessive socket voting.

Congratulations halibit

http://www.ytj.fi/english/yritystiedot.aspx?yavain=2502807&kielikoodi=3&tarkiste=A1CE0E52CBC6A9BC358AC8C9A583D6BDAF7E2F18&path=1704;1736;2052

Mintcoin [MINT]
Aircoin   [AIR]

Yeah, that`s the thing, we can`t go ahead and add every coin like cryptorush. But, we could monitor the market and look for increasing volume from the smaller exchanges. When spaincoin (as example) started to get more than 10 btc in volume from an exchange like poloniex, we should prepare and put the coin up to a vote. The shareholders then need to do their research, and decide wether or not they see it as exciting. I don`t know how many shareholders we are or the weight of each, but if the distribution is large enough, it should reflect the general view of a coin. To spaincoins defence, it still maintains high volume, more than 90 btc the last 24 hours.

This is a way we can filter the coins through exchanges like c-cex, poloniex, coins-e, coinedup, coinex etc.

And, as a criticism of other exchanges: the dead markets should be removed much faster. CTM/BTC on mintpal is a good example, with tradingvolume less than 0.2 btc the last 24 hours. Give something like a 2 weeks notice, and delist it, or change it to a ctm/mrc or ctm/ltc-cross. CTM took me 5 minutes to figure out was a lost cause, before mintpal added it.

Congrats MCR, halibit and all MRC backers 

@ocean

1+

I know what you mean.

But if we are "adaptable" as you said, in few month we are cryptorush 2! Look at the market last few month. Mostly every shitcoins marketcap was disproportional high.

Should we really list about 200 coins respectively change the number every month?

Have a look at spaincoin for example. 0 - 100 in 2!! days. And 100 - 0  by next week (if you ask me).


Edit:

How we can verify a stakeholder? I mean everyone can post his fav. coins right now.

What are the rules for the voting? Will every coin which has a positive ratio be added to the exchange?
I dont think that this would be a good idea.
Should we not start by voting about the style which way we add new coins or remove them?

Next, Doge, Blackcoin, Aurora, Mint,Dark, Vert,Klondike and Particle are some of the interesting new coins...

Consider Adding:

Birdcoin [BRD]
ChiKun [KUN]
ECCoin [ECC]
CarpeDiemCoin [DIEM]
Version [V]
Emoticoin [EMO]

I`ve been in crypto since 2011, so I`ve seen a lot. I totally agree it is ridiculous seing all the coins hitting the market. But yes, I make money from this strange world.

But we are talking about listing coins on an exchange, and to get customers and revenue for our own company (you own shares, you own part of the company). You don`t get that with how cryptos are today without doing what the market wants. You could create an ideologic exchange, how you wish cryptos should be, but you would be there with few others. Who knows what the market wants in 2 years? If we are adaptable, we will succeed. Fighting against it, we will lose.