My wallet don't sync with window 8 i paste .conf but nothing.
If you head to the debug options under help, what block count do you see? The wallets will be out of sync until the faucet payments begin. We can help you in IRC if you wish.
Topic: [ANN][FIND] FindCoin | Update Wallet If You Haven't! | Community Anti-Scam Token - page 87. (Read 126380 times)
December 26, 2014, 04:11:42 PM
If you head to the debug options under help, what block count do you see? The wallets will be out of sync until the faucet payments begin. We can help you in IRC if you wish.
December 26, 2014, 04:10:35 PM
Will the source for the wallet be released anytime soon? I can't run the compiled ubuntu binary as it appears to be compiled for 32bit arch. And it does appear a bit fishy that no source is provided, what do you have to hide after all? It's just a bitcoin-qt fork.
The 32-bit binary should run on ubuntu machines, have you used the wrapper? The source was decided to be closed by the community to prevent cheating by adding in proxy options (dev team didn't decide this).
I don't have 32bit compat mode enabled on my kernel for security reasons, I'm one of those technically skilled tinfoil hats. Care to elaborate 'cheating by adding in proxy options'? If you mean running more than one wallet per person to cheat the faucet distribution system then it's really contra-productive since I can run as many instances as I want of the wallet via tor and you will never tell the difference so it defeats the whole purpose to hold on to the code. Don't get me wrong I like the idea of this coin and the binaries are probably harmless but in theory they could be running something malicious and without debugging/sniffing packets nobody could tell, with full source code on the other hand such a feat is next to impossible. So in interest of gaining trust with the dev team my opinion is to release the code and figure something better to prevent cheating as it really doesn't stop people to run more than one wallet per IP/machine/whatever.
And after all it's almost 2015 who the hell runs 32bit linux boxes?
https://mega.co.nz/#!3JkjxRAK!uNFWbcU7Okl_RTM28yQoMEN689I2RsPobgexdtXdfVI
64 bit ubuntu build, care to test? I will discuss release of source code with the team, but I don't believe the community will agree.
Will do, thank you very much. If I can demonstrate that I can run more than one wallet via different proxies the community would have to agree as their reason for keeping the source code private is without merit.
December 26, 2014, 04:09:22 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
I am sorry man but I am still confused.
will the wallets work for distribution with the other wallet.dat in them or do I need to use a clean wallet for distro?
Yea no problem. The wallets will work, but you will see unconfirmed transactions from the old network. These won't affect you during distribution or anything like that. I just added in the exchange form how you can get rid of the old transactions by sending your coins to a new wallet after you receive them from us. TLDR: Wait until you get your coins from exchange and then switch to a new wallet by following steps I just added to the exchange form.
Awesome,Thank you
Is there any reasons why not simply use dumpprivkey/importprivkey ?
You can use that method once we email you which address the coins were sent to. The wallet.dat way is another option, made for people with less experience with private keys and such.
December 26, 2014, 04:07:32 PM
Will the source for the wallet be released anytime soon? I can't run the compiled ubuntu binary as it appears to be compiled for 32bit arch. And it does appear a bit fishy that no source is provided, what do you have to hide after all? It's just a bitcoin-qt fork.
The 32-bit binary should run on ubuntu machines, have you used the wrapper? The source was decided to be closed by the community to prevent cheating by adding in proxy options (dev team didn't decide this).
I don't have 32bit compat mode enabled on my kernel for security reasons, I'm one of those technically skilled tinfoil hats. Care to elaborate 'cheating by adding in proxy options'? If you mean running more than one wallet per person to cheat the faucet distribution system then it's really contra-productive since I can run as many instances as I want of the wallet via tor and you will never tell the difference so it defeats the whole purpose to hold on to the code. Don't get me wrong I like the idea of this coin and the binaries are probably harmless but in theory they could be running something malicious and without debugging/sniffing packets nobody could tell, with full source code on the other hand such a feat is next to impossible. So in interest of gaining trust with the dev team my opinion is to release the code and figure something better to prevent cheating as it really doesn't stop people to run more than one wallet per IP/machine/whatever.
And after all it's almost 2015 who the hell runs 32bit linux boxes?
https://mega.co.nz/#!3JkjxRAK!uNFWbcU7Okl_RTM28yQoMEN689I2RsPobgexdtXdfVI
64 bit ubuntu build, care to test? I will discuss release of source code with the team, but I don't believe the community will agree.
December 26, 2014, 04:07:02 PM
My wallet don't sync with window 8 i paste .conf but nothing.
December 26, 2014, 04:01:47 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
I am sorry man but I am still confused.
will the wallets work for distribution with the other wallet.dat in them or do I need to use a clean wallet for distro?
Yea no problem. The wallets will work, but you will see unconfirmed transactions from the old network. These won't affect you during distribution or anything like that. I just added in the exchange form how you can get rid of the old transactions by sending your coins to a new wallet after you receive them from us. TLDR: Wait until you get your coins from exchange and then switch to a new wallet by following steps I just added to the exchange form.
Awesome,Thank you
Is there any reasons why not simply use dumpprivkey/importprivkey ?
December 26, 2014, 03:57:49 PM
Will the source for the wallet be released anytime soon? I can't run the compiled ubuntu binary as it appears to be compiled for 32bit arch. And it does appear a bit fishy that no source is provided, what do you have to hide after all? It's just a bitcoin-qt fork.
The 32-bit binary should run on ubuntu machines, have you used the wrapper? The source was decided to be closed by the community to prevent cheating by adding in proxy options (dev team didn't decide this).
I don't have 32bit compat mode enabled on my kernel for security reasons, I'm one of those technically skilled tinfoil hats. Care to elaborate 'cheating by adding in proxy options'? If you mean running more than one wallet per person to cheat the faucet distribution system then it's really contra-productive since I can run as many instances as I want of the wallet via tor and you will never tell the difference so it defeats the whole purpose to hold on to the code. Don't get me wrong I like the idea of this coin and the binaries are probably harmless but in theory they could be running something malicious and without debugging/sniffing packets nobody could tell, with full source code on the other hand such a feat is next to impossible. So in interest of gaining trust with the dev team my opinion is to release the code and figure something better to prevent cheating as it really doesn't stop people to run more than one wallet per IP/machine/whatever.
And after all it's almost 2015 who the hell runs 32bit linux boxes?
December 26, 2014, 03:54:21 PM
Will the source for the wallet be released anytime soon? I can't run the compiled ubuntu binary as it appears to be compiled for 32bit arch. And it does appear a bit fishy that no source is provided, what do you have to hide after all? It's just a bitcoin-qt fork.
The 32-bit binary should run on ubuntu machines, have you used the wrapper? The source was decided to be closed by the community to prevent cheating by adding in proxy options (dev team didn't decide this). We will release it after distribution.
December 26, 2014, 03:45:55 PM
Will the source for the wallet be released anytime soon? I can't run the compiled ubuntu binary as it appears to be compiled for 32bit arch. And it does appear a bit fishy that no source is provided, what do you have to hide after all? It's just a bitcoin-qt fork.
December 26, 2014, 03:43:53 PM
New wallet downloaded and synced
I wait the faucet to start in 1h
Thanks for your great job
I wait the faucet to start in 1h
Thanks for your great job
December 26, 2014, 03:25:13 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
I am sorry man but I am still confused.
will the wallets work for distribution with the other wallet.dat in them or do I need to use a clean wallet for distro?
Yea no problem. The wallets will work, but you will see unconfirmed transactions from the old network. These won't affect you during distribution or anything like that. I just added in the exchange form how you can get rid of the old transactions by sending your coins to a new wallet after you receive them from us. TLDR: Wait until you get your coins from exchange and then switch to a new wallet by following steps I just added to the exchange form.
Awesome,Thank you
December 26, 2014, 03:23:25 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
I am sorry man but I am still confused.
will the wallets work for distribution with the other wallet.dat in them or do I need to use a clean wallet for distro?
Yea no problem. The wallets will work, but you will see unconfirmed transactions from the old network. These won't affect you during distribution or anything like that. I just added in the exchange form how you can get rid of the old transactions by sending your coins to a new wallet after you receive them from us. TLDR: Wait until you get your coins from exchange and then switch to a new wallet by following steps I just added to the exchange form.
December 26, 2014, 03:16:41 PM
Wallet synced, when's the distrubition starts?
A) read the first post in this thread
B) go to our official site www.findcoin.info and see countdown
C) no, I can't just tell you when - you have to work very hard to get such rare knowledge!
OK My Find wallet is ready for relaunch in 5 ..Count down
December 26, 2014, 03:14:58 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
I am sorry man but I am still confused.
will the wallets work for distribution with the other wallet.dat in them or do I need to use a clean wallet for distro?
December 26, 2014, 02:58:27 PM
After reading some of the confusion I will add to the FAQ not to worry about transaction errors.
December 26, 2014, 02:55:42 PM
Conflicted transactions are normal with the new wallet, as they did not occur on the new FindCoin network (You don't need to do anything, you will get your coins and you can transfer them to a clean wallet if you wish to do so). Distribution starts in 2 and a half hours. Head to the IRC if you want to get quick answers .
+1 .. yeah hehe i totally forgot about irc . December 26, 2014, 02:52:10 PM
Old appdata is not compatible with new I think.
The wallets operate on the same keys, the transactions will show errors as they are from the old network. Appdata is incompatible, yes (It has the old blockchain).
December 26, 2014, 02:51:57 PM
my wallet now syncing thank you to all of you who have been doing mining
Wallets may go out of sync soon for a few hours, our miner Nthused will be back for faucet launch though, so no worries
.-Quadmium
Thanks for clarifying...Appreciated!
December 26, 2014, 02:50:53 PM
Old appdata is not compatible with new I think.
December 26, 2014, 02:49:38 PM
Conflicted transactions are normal with the new wallet, as they did not occur on the new FindCoin network (You don't need to do anything, you will get your coins and you can transfer them to a clean wallet if you wish to do so). Distribution starts in 2 and a half hours. Head to the IRC if you want to get quick answers .
. Jump to: