Topic: [ANN][FLAP] FlappyCoin ★ OLD/DEAD THREAD GO TO NEW ONE ★ - page 25. (Read 345302 times)
I will be sending some flap aswell
Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?
When this is done I am putting up 10,000,000 FLAP towards bounty for guys that sort this problem out after I get a few trades on FLAP when market moves.Then depending on how price works out will donate 10% off all profits back into FLAP organisation.
You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
Simply do not disappear forever!
I won't. I won't make excuses either. I nearly abandoned the project when half my team quit and my compile guys ended up not delivering. Though that's not fair to everyone; and this is why the old developer left to a couple weeks back(Nearly same situation for him and his team actually). Unable to come up with a solution. After my whole "Is it worth it? What can I do?" I came to the realization that this project needs honesty. It needs maturity and it deserves someone willing to stay and take the blame and attempt to move forward with the community to fix these issues.
now we have thimo, let's move on
You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
Simply do not disappear forever!
I won't. I won't make excuses either. I nearly abandoned the project when half my team quit and my compile guys ended up not delivering. Though that's not fair to everyone; and this is why the old developer left to a couple weeks back(Nearly same situation for him and his team actually). Unable to come up with a solution. After my whole "Is it worth it? What can I do?" I came to the realization that this project needs honesty. It needs maturity and it deserves someone willing to stay and take the blame and attempt to move forward with the community to fix these issues.
You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
Simply do not disappear forever!
Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000
in main.cpp
in main.cpp
Code:
unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
I hope that's not from the original source, that's pretty ugly logic there
That's pretty hard to read code, but getting it to work is top priority of course!
Code:
unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
}
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock);
}
Would work as well {
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
}
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock);
}
Okay fixed it, i'm downloading the entire chain to make sure everything is okay. Then i will compile wallets and upload.
Awesome thanks!! Looking forward to this. Thimo, are you planning to stay on the team for future compiles or is this a one time thing?
You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.
Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000
in main.cpp
in main.cpp
Code:
unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
I hope that's not from the original source, that's pretty ugly logic there
Okay fixed it, i'm downloading the entire chain to make sure everything is okay. Then i will compile wallets and upload.
Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?
Hold on, let's first get it working properly.You have added the KGW fix yourself right?
I have.
Are you looking at the below fork or the old fork?
We don't have access to flappycoin of github, so we had to do a fork awhile back off the master fork listed at FlapCoin.
https://github.com/FlapCoin/flapcoin/commits/master
You'll see commits there. At the same point the KGW exploit fix was implemented then it's block number changed.
Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?
Hold on, let's first get it working properly.You have added the KGW fix yourself right?
Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?
so we can expect the new wallet shortly?
thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?
I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...
cut
Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?
Here are the binaries, i'll upload to github in a minute
http://slothcoin.org/download/flappycoin-windows 2.0.0.1.rar
please test it thouroughly and report any bug!
Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?
we are ready to go!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slow down, there needs to be some testing first
Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000
in main.cpp
in main.cpp
Code:
unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
{
int DiffMode = 1;
if (fTestNet) {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
}
else {
if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
}
if (DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
else if (DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}
we are ready to go!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...
I not a C++ programmer... but I've learned from Google that the official wallet builds for Litecoin are made using Gitian build process.
Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?
so we can expect the new wallet shortly?
thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?
I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...
cut
Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?
Here are the binaries, i'll upload to github in a minute
http://slothcoin.org/download/flappycoin-windows 2.0.0.1.rar
please test it thouroughly and report any bug!
Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?
so we can expect the new wallet shortly?
thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?
I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...
http://i.imgur.com/Ca2lDyy.png
Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?
Jump to: